The following, my response to Ray, doesn't seem to have made it to the list.  
Perhaps it was to long in the original form, so I'm shortening it and sending 
again.  If, along with this one, the original appears, please don't feel you 
have to read it twice.

Ed


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ed Weick 
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION 
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] The only exception -- was Living within our means


Wow Ray, do you write a good letter!  Beyond saying that, I won't comment on 
the whole thing, but I would like to add a few things myself.

 

You mention building huge churches on sites sacred to Indian people in 
meso-America.  That is something many people have done in many parts of the 
world.  Here's something I wrote many years ago after visiting Mount Rushmore, 
a place which had been sacred to the Lakota Sioux since time immemorial:

 

I  found  the  faces of the presidents disturbing.  Perhaps it was because  I  
am not  American and didn't really have much part in what was going on.  But 
why would anyone do that to a mountain?  Especially one that is sacred to 
another people?  But evidently I was missing something.  Hadn't most shrines 
and temples been built on the sites of earlier ones?  Hadn't it been a time 
honored tradition to topple one group of gods and raise up a new temple to 
superior gods in the same place?  What the Americans had done to the Sioux, the 
Romans had done to the Greeks, and the Christianized Europeans had in turn done 
to the Romans.  It is the site that endures, not the temple nor the gods.  It 
will remain sacred, whatever gods of human transience occupy it at a particular 
time.

 

You also mention the damage caused by lead and zinc mining at Picher, how the 
white folks were removed from there and how the Quapaw were left behind.  You 
warned that Canada had better be prepared for the same kind of thing in the 
Chilcotin  lands in northern BC.  Actually, we've gone through things like that 
several times.  Port Radium at the eastern end of Great Bear Lake is one 
example.  Back in the 1960s and 1970s men in the community of Deline at the 
western end of Great Bear Lake were dieing of cancer which, the community 
argued, was caused by uranium mined at Port Radium.  In the 1940s and 50s the 
men had been hired to carry uranium ore from the mine to boats that would 
transport it the Mackenzie River.  Soon after, Deline became known as the 
"village of widows".  Uranium City in northern Saskatchewan is another example. 
 The mine closed in 1982, leaving huge piles of tailing behind.  Indian 
residents of communities in the area felt that the tailings had affected their 
health.  And now we have the oil sands of northern Alberta with people being 
affected by toxins downstream along the Athabaska River.

 

On another matter, what you say in your email indicates that your ancestry is 
Cherokee.  Little wonder that you see Indian people as farmers and not as 
hunters and gatherers.  Originally, the Cherokees were an agricultural people 
living in the eastern US, mainly Georgia, until they were removed to Oklahoma 
in the mid 1800s.  Here's something I posted to Futurework back in 1999 or 
thereabouts, after reading John Collier's Indians of the Americas, first 
published in 1947.  Collier was US Commissioner of Indian Affairs from 1933 to 
1945.

 

1830s-1840s - Trail of Tears and United States (Marshall) concept of Indian 
Nationhood: Five Civilized Tribes removed beyond the Mississippi.  Collier 
(Mentor edition, 1948) focuses on the Cherokee, an Iroquoian people, and the 
largest of the "civilized tribes".  Prior to the American Revolution, the 
British had repeatedly prevented incursions into Cherokee lands by "borderers" 
and the Cherokee allied themselves with the British during the revolution.  
They continued to fight the Americans until 1794, when the signed a treaty with 
the US Government.  This was breached in the letter and spirit repeatedly by 
the US Government in the subsequent years.  In 1828 Andrew Jackson, who had 
been a famous Indian fighter and borderer and who had beaten the British in the 
battle for New Orleans, was elected President.  Almost immediately, he 
persuaded Congress to pass the Indian Removal Act, 1830, which enabled him to 
remove all Indian tribes to west of the Mississippi (the Mississippi had become 
the new line between the colonized lands and Indian Territory, replacing the 
Appalachians of the Royal Proclamation).  At about the same time, gold was 
discovered in the remaining Cherokee country, and the Georgia legislature 
passed an act confiscating all Cherokee land within the state, declaring all 
laws of the Cherokee Nation null and void, and forbidding Indians to testify in 
any state court against white men.  The Cherokee lands were to be distributed 
to whites through a lottery system.

 

An appeal from John Ross, the Cherokee Chief, to President Jackson got nowhere. 
 An appeal to the Supreme Court also failed, as the court refused to take 
jurisdiction on grounds that the tribe was not a foreign nation (and therefore 
within the legal jurisdiction of Georgia?).  Two years later, the arrest of 
some missionaries who refused to swear allegiance to Georgia while resident in 
Cherokee territory brought about the famous (Chief Justice of the Supreme 
Court) John Marshall decision that:

 

The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own 
territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which the laws of Georgia 
can have no force, and which the  citizens of Georgia have no right to enter, 
but with the assent of the Cherokees themselves, or in conformity with treaties 
and with acts of Congress. (Collier, p.123)

 

This decision was based on Marshall's concept that Indian tribes or nations 

 

...had always been considered as distinct, independent, political communities, 
retaining their original natural rights...and the settled doctrine of the law 
of nations is, that a weaker power does not surrender its independence -- its 
right of self-government -- by associating with a stronger, and taking its 
protection. (ibid.)

 

Jackson reacted with contempt: "John Marshall has rendered his decision; now 
let him enforce it." (ibid.)  The destructive policies toward the Cherokees 
continued.  A "fictional treaty" which assigned the remaining 7 million acres 
of land still held by the Cherokees to the US government for $4.5 million which 
was to be deposited in the US Treasury to the credit of the Cherokees was 
signed at a set-up meeting.  Three years later, US troops and "a non-military 
rabble of followers", invaded the Cherokee lands and removed the Cherokees to 
concentration camps.  "Livestock, household goods, farm implements, everything 
went to the white camp-followers; the homes were usually burned." (Collier, 
p124) 14,000 were forced to trek to Arkansas.  Of these, 4,000 reportedly died 
on the way.  A great lie was woven around the exodus: In addressing Congress on 
December 3, 1838, President Van Buren said:

 

The measures [for Cherokee removal] authorized by Congress at its last session 
have had the happiest effects...The Cherokees have emigrated without any 
apparent reluctance. (Quoted in Collier, p.124)

 

Like the Cherokees, the others of the Five Civilized Tribes, the Choctaws, 
Chickasaws, Creeks and Seminoles were also removed to Indian Territory in what 
is now Oklahoma. (All above based on Collier, pp. 121-125)

 

 

A very sad piece of history.

 

Ed

 





  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ray Harrell 
  To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' 
  Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 5:48 PM
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] The only exception -- was Living within our means


  Ed, 

   

  I certainly have feelings for remnant populations all over North and South 
America.    I also have feelings for the populations in meso-America where they 
have had huge churches built on their sacred sites.   Certainly that is 
preferable to having the sites bulldozed for oil or a pipeline.    But still... 
   Are you comfortable with a Wolverine parka?

   

  My family has always worked with our people but in most cases, other than 
myself, behind the scenes.     Because they held no standing in court until 
1936 and couldn't worship and could even be sterilized without their knowledge 
in Indian Health services until 1978 (when both were revoked by Congress),   
they chose to assimilate and hide their identity.   In some relatives they even 
forgot who they were because what "was assumed" wasn't taught lest everyone be 
thrown out of the "Hiding Bushes."   

   

  I was in New York City by then.    Because of all of that hokum (what we call 
ukstaha or brown smelly liquid exuding from the bottom of two leggeds)  my 
family worked in Indian Schools, lived in Indian communities but never made a 
big deal about being Indian.   They just WERE.    Meanwhile my mother's skin 
was white and so is mine.   It opened the door for me to many white 
institutions where I heard what they said about my relatives but I was told to 
keep my mouth shut and learn because the learning was important for the 
"people".   It never was about "justice."   My father worked in Creek Indian 
schools but his real accomplishment was at Picher in the Lead and Zinc Mining 
community where he raised an Indian and Mixed school from the lower 15% in the 
nation to the 88% based on a core curriculum built around the Arts and Physical 
Education.    Arts for the mind, Physical Education to purify the body from the 
pollution.    The 88th % shows what happened to their academics as a result.   
There have been movies about that town and school and many books written since 
it grew, prospered and persisted even though it was declared the number one 
toxic site for lead and heavy metals in America.      Eventually a tornado and 
politicians decided that the best thing to do was to remove the white residents 
and give the land back to the Quapaw to clean up.   (But that's another 
atrocity story.   Looks like Canadians are getting ready to repeat the formula 
in BC.)     

   

  My edoda   then went on to school in his fifties at the same University where 
I got my undergraduate.    At 55 he earned two doctorates in Psychometrics 
(testing).     Eventually the results of the Lead poison killed him.   As the 
oldest male child of seven children he died before any of the others at 76 
while his other brothers have lived and worked into their nineties, without the 
lead exposure.    The youngest brother who smoked and taught for a year at 
Picher, died his eighties from lung cancer.    He was the only one that smoked. 
  The other two brothers are still alive and one just celebrated his 70th  
wedding anniversary with his Creek wife who was a famous piano teacher in 
Oklahoma.



  Etc.     

   
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to