Ignatieff may or may not have played a role.  In any case it was a silly
move.

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Gurstein
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 9:19 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: [Futurework] FW: [Caidc-rccdi] The Economist on Canada's Bid for
the Security Council

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pamela Branch
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 4:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Caidc-rccdi] The Economist on Canada's Bid for the Security
Council

Thanks to member Hubert LeBlanc who thought CAIDC Members would be
interested in the following.

 

> Canada's foreign policy Snubbed
> 
> Better at doughnuts than diplomacy
> 
> 
> Oct 14th 2010 | Ottawa
> 
> 
> IN 2003 Bono, a rock star and poverty campaigner, proclaimed that “The
> world needs more Canada”. This week, the world decided it didn’t. On
> October 12th Canada lost its bid for a rotating seat on the United Nations
> Security Council, for the first time since the organisation was founded in
> 1945. That Germany was preferred was acceptable; not so, being passed over
> in favour of Portugal.
> 
> 
> Stephen Harper’s Conservative government blamed the opposition leader,
> Michael Ignatieff, for the snub, because he had suggested that Canada did
> not deserve the seat. But many countries apparently share Mr Ignatieff’s
> dislike of Mr Harper’s foreign policy. This has featured outspoken support
> of Israel’s hardline government, alienating the Muslim countries that make
> up a third of the UN’s membership. Mr Harper has also made few friends in
> Africa (where he has closed embassies), or in Europe and among island
> states (with his feeble policy on climate change).
> 
> 
> He came to power in 2006 sceptical of Canada’s traditional multilateralism
> (“a weak-nation strategy”, he said) and of the UN itself. Last year he
> raised eyebrows by choosing to inaugurate a doughnut-innovation centre
> rather than attend the UN General Assembly. His country’s commitment to UN
> peacekeeping missions, for which a former Liberal prime minister once won
a
> Nobel prize, declined sharply under the previous government and has not
> increased under Mr Harper.
> 
> 
> So why bother to seek a Security Council seat? The Conservatives seem now
> to realise that strong links to the United States are no longer enough in
a
> changing world. Canada is still a big UN paymaster. As host of the G8
> summit this year, it pushed for more aid for maternal and child health in
> poor countries. But its overtures to China and India came too late to sway
> the vote.
> 
> 
> The snub has handed Mr Harper’s opponents a club with which to beat him.
> Jean Chrétien, a former Liberal prime minister, noted acidly that “In
> Canada, we have to realise that what you do has consequences.” Pollsters
> say the public attach little importance to a UN seat. But this was
supposed
> to be a year in which Canada would figure large on the world stage. It
> started with the winter Olympics in Vancouver and the economy’s swift
> recovery from recession, and continued with hosting the G8 and G20
summits.
> It seems to have ended early.
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to