A very deep and meaningful lesson!

Ed


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sandwichman" <[email protected]>
To: "RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] careful planning rarely changes history


> Beautiful!
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Darryl or Natalia <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Sam Smith's review, Undernews, Nov. 10, featured an essay on how 
>> Americans
>> might get out of the mess the elite have put them in. Below is the latter
>> half, starting with an exploration of how the Solidarity movement came to
>> pass. I thought some might wish to comment upon his observations.
>>
>> Natalia
>>
>> GETTING THROUGH THE BAD TIMES
>>
>> "It is the struggle of a state in ludicrous pursuit of a nation that it
>> cannot seem to find. And, it is the struggle of a nation trying to find a
>> way to meet the state, not in the posture of supplicant or avenger, but 
>> in
>> the posture of free citizen."
>>
>> Rensenbrink tells me that some of Solidarity's early organizing took 
>> place
>> on the trains that many of the workers rode to the shipyards, where they 
>> had
>> time to drink coffee and talk. In our own history, there are innumerable
>> examples of change owing a debt to the simple serendipity of people of 
>> like
>> values and sensibilities coming together. For example, the rise of Irish
>> political power in this country was aided considerably by the Irish bar's
>> role as an ethnic DMZ and a center for the exchange of information.
>>
>> CS Lewis says somewhere that we read to discover that we are not alone. 
>> That
>> discovery is a necessary for change as well. Part of the dreadful force 
>> of
>> southern segregation, for example, was that it prevented poor whites and
>> poor blacks from discovering how much they had in common.
>>
>> We tend to discount the importance of unplanned moments because of our
>> fealty to the business school paradigm in which change properly occurs
>> because of a careful strategic plan, an organized vision, procedures, and
>> process. During the past quarter century when such ideas have been in
>> ascendancy, however, America has demonstratively deteriorated as a
>> political, economic, and moral force. In reality, many of the best things
>> happen by accident and indirection. While it may be true, as the Roman 
>> said,
>> that "fortune smiles on the well prepared" part of that preparation is to 
>> be
>> in the right place at the right time. In other words, it is necessary to
>> create an ecology of change rather than a precise and often illusory
>> process.
>>
>> The beat generation understood this. Unlike today's activists they lacked 
>> a
>> plan; unlike those of the 60s they lacked anything to plan for; what
>> substituted for utopia and organization was the freedom to think, to 
>> speak,
>> to move at will in a culture that thought it had adequately taken care of
>> all such matters. To a far greater degree than rebellions that followed, 
>> the
>> beat culture created its message by being rather than doing, rejection
>> rather than confrontation, sensibility rather than strategy, journeys
>> instead of movements, words and music instead of acts, and informal
>> communities rather than formal institutions.
>>
>> The full-fledged uprisings that followed could not have occurred without
>> years of anger and hope being expressed in more individualistic and less
>> disciplined ways, ways that may seem ineffective in retrospect yet served 
>> as
>> absolutely necessary scaffolding with which to build a powerful movement.
>>
>> One of these ways, for example, is music. Billie Holiday was singing 
>> about
>> lynchings long before the modern civil rights movement. And Rage Against 
>> the
>> Machine was engaging in anti-sweatshop protests some years before most
>> college student had ever heard of them.
>>
>> Another way is found in the magic of churches. During the 1960s I edited 
>> a
>> newspaper in a neighborhood 75% black and mostly poor in which I came to
>> assume that churches were the sina qua non of positive change. We had 
>> over a
>> 100 of them in a two square mile area and you just came to rely upon them 
>> as
>> part of the political action, including the Revolutionary Church of 
>> What's
>> Happenin' Now and the Rev. Frank Milner, part-minister and part-taxicab
>> driver who would come to community meetings in an outfit complete with
>> clerical collar and a metal change-maker on his belt.
>>
>> How important one church can be is illustrated with a little known story
>> from Birmingham Alabama. Responding to Rosa Parks' mistreatment, sleeping
>> car porter E.D. Nixon called up a young preacher and asked if he could 
>> use
>> his church for a meeting. The minister said he would think about it. A 
>> few
>> days later, Nixon called back and the minister agreed. E.D. Nixon's reply
>> was something like this, "Thank you Reverend King, because we've 
>> scheduled a
>> meeting at your church next Monday at 6:30 pm."
>>
>> It is for such reasons we must learn to stand outside of history. 
>> Quakerism,
>> for example, prescribes personal witness as guided by conscience -
>> regardless of the era in which we live or the circumstances in which we 
>> find
>> ourselves. And the witness need not be verbal. The Quakers say "let your
>> life speak," echoing St. Francis of Assisi's' advice that one should 
>> preach
>> the gospel at all times and "if necessary, use words."
>>
>> There are about as many Quakers today in America as there were in the 
>> 18th
>> century, around 100,000. Yet near the center of every great moment of
>> American social and political change one finds members of the Society of
>> Friends. Why? In part because they have been willing to fail year after 
>> year
>> between those great moments. Because they have been willing in good times
>> and bad -- in the instructions of their early leader George Fox -- "to 
>> walk
>> cheerfully over the face of the earth answering that of God in every one 
>> "
>>
>> The existentialists knew how to stand outside of history as well.
>> Existentialism, which has been described as the idea that no one can take
>> your shower for you, is based on the hat trick of passion, integrity and
>> rebellion. An understanding that we create ourselves by what we do and 
>> say
>> and, in the words of one of their philosophers, even a condemned man has 
>> a
>> choice of how to approach the gallows.
>>
>> Those who think history has left us helpless should recall the 
>> abolitionist
>> of 1830, the feminist of 1870, the labor organizer of 1890, or the gay or
>> lesbian writer of 1910. They, like us, did not get to choose their time 
>> in
>> history but they, like us, did get to choose what they did with it.
>>
>> Would we have been abolitionists in 1830?
>>
>> In 1848, 300 people gathered at Seneca Falls, NY, for a seminal moment in
>> the American women's movement. On November 2, 1920, 91 year-old Charlotte
>> Woodward Pierce became the only signer of the Seneca Falls Declaration of
>> Sentiments and Resolutions who had lived long enough to cast a ballot for
>> president.
>>
>> Would we have attended that conference in 1848? Would we have bothered?
>>
>> Or consider the Jewish cigar makers in early 20th century New York City 
>> each
>> contributing a small sum to hire a man to sit with them as they worked -
>> reading aloud the classic works of Yiddish literature. The leader of the
>> cigar-makers, Samuel Gompers, would later become the first president of 
>> the
>> American Federation of Labor. And those like him would become part of a
>> Jewish tradition that profoundly shaped the politics, social conscience, 
>> and
>> cultural course of 20th century America. While Protestants and Irish
>> Catholics controlled the institutions of politics, the ideas of modern
>> social democracy disproportionately came from native populists and 
>> immigrant
>> socialists. It is certainly impossible to imagine liberalism, the civil
>> rights movement, or the Vietnam protests without the Jewish left.
>>
>> These are the sort of the stories we must find and tell each other during
>> the bad days ahead. But there is a problem. The system that envelopes us
>> becomes normal by its mere mass, its ubiquitous messages, its sheer 
>> noise.
>> Our society faces what William Burroughs called a biologic crisis --  
>> "like
>> being dead and not knowing it." Or as Matthew Arnold put it, trapped 
>> between
>> two worlds, one dead, the other unable to be born.
>>
>> We are overpowered and afraid. We find ourselves condoning things simply
>> because not to do so means we would then have to -- at unknown risk --  
>> truly
>> challenge them.
>>
>> Yet, in a perverse way, our predicament makes life simpler. We have 
>> clearly
>> lost what we have lost. We can give up our futile efforts to preserve the
>> illusion and turn our energies instead to the construction of a new time.
>>
>> It is this willingness to walk away from the seductive power of the 
>> present
>> that first divides the mere reformer from the rebel -- the courage to
>> emigrate from one's own ways in order to meet the future not as an
>> entitlement but as a frontier.
>>
>> How one does this can vary markedly, but one of the bad habits we have
>> acquired from the bullies who now run the place is undue reliance on
>> traditional political, legal and rhetorical tools. Politically active
>> Americans have been taught that even at the risk of losing our planet and
>> our democracy, we must go about it all in a rational manner, never 
>> raising
>> our voice, never doing the unlikely or trying the improbable, let alone
>> screaming for help.
>>
>> We will not overcome the current crisis solely with political logic. We 
>> need
>> living rooms like those in which women once discovered they were not 
>> alone.
>> The freedom schools of SNCC. The politics of the folk guitar. The plays 
>> of
>> Vaclav Havel. Unitarian church basements. The pain of James Baldwin. The
>> laughter of Abbie Hoffman. The strategy of Gandhi and King. Unexpected
>> gatherings and unpredicted coalitions. People coming together because 
>> they
>> disagree on every subject save one: the need to preserve the human. 
>> Savage
>> satire and gentle poetry. Boisterous revival and silent meditation. Grand
>> assemblies and simple suppers.
>>
>> Above all, we must understand that in leaving the toxic ways of the 
>> present
>> we are healing ourselves, our places, and our planet. We must rebel not 
>> as a
>> last act of desperation but as a first act of creation.
>>
>> Portions of this talk come from Sam Smith's book " Why Bother?," which 
>> deals
>> with getting through the bad times including chapters on despair, 
>> rebellion,
>> personal witness, and guerrilla democracy.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Futurework mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Sandwichman
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to