Sometimes I think these modern folks could have never enjoyed the pleasures
of maniac or tapioca  since they would have not had the patience to detoxify
the root  before they put it out into the food chain.   In my opinion, if
the countries were as toxic, and the governments as efficient as these folks
have implied through the first set of leaks, then these  whistleblowers
would have never survived to release the second group.     I'm glad they
released the Afghanistan papers because it put the military on alert that
they are not above International law.     I haven't read these papers but
the description as diplomatic materials I find disturbing and suspect it
will shut down rather than facilitate International cooperation.
Admittedly I say this as a suspicion since I have not read the materials yet
and probably won't. 

 

The movie "Fair Game" showed the stupidity inherent in the human condition
on all levels of society.    The world is human.   Humans are fallible.
Valerie Plame imprinted on the system and would have lost her family had not
her father intervened to short circuit the imprinting.    Loyalty is
important but it can be abused.    Will people die for what is on these
cables?    The wrong people?    The little people who took a chance and
believed too easily?    

 

I believe the spirit is eternal.   That the wheel of time and life turns.
That spirits return and take revenge because the balance of the wheel must
be assured if it is to exist.    Demonic processes recycle in contemporary
scientific jargon for ulterior purposes.   These "new" ideas circulate and
are like,  the "latest immigrant snails clogging the release valves of the
local nuclear cooling towers".    Such rehashed principles are easily
converted to the social pathologies of chauvinism and provinciality by
adults who should know better.    

 

ANALOGIES: 

 

In the 1960s,  music faced a similar dilemma as the musics of the world
arrived in the International consciousness.    They called into question all
of the presuppositions of Western Music and for a while the universality of
music itself.     It seems everyone wanted THEIR national music to be THE
music of the spheres.     But, like languages,  all musics are equal and all
are a facet on the sphere of universal artistry found in every culture.    

 

But musics are not only national.    When I was researching for the
"American Masters Arts Festival" in New York I discovered that there were
regional musics from each part of the country that were not just
entertainment but (like the regional architecture), were serious aural
explorations of the identity of that region.    Northwest coast for example
compared to the Northeast.     Chicago compared to Santa Fe.  

 

America thinks generally as a "United Artistic State",  but in reality the
serious music is regional and is just beneath the surface unable to emerge
because, as another list member pointed out to me privately, " the Art of
America is commerce and not music."   (Shades of the Euro?)     

 

The answer,  (if your musical identity is to be unified and not suppressed),
is articulation and acceptance of the entire sphere of identities.    Then
you teach each other and arrive at, as the Soviets did in Russia before
their demise, a  synergy of artistry that takes on a life of its own as a
national identity.  

 

But even worse than the music, is the loss of linguistic identity,
especially here in the U.S..     Just as the list had trouble with our Swiss
colleague and the interpretations he put on issues (English language), how
much more trouble will the rest of the world have on these cables with no
context and English not as good as the multi-lingual Swiss?    If they can't
understand Gilbert and Sullivan or Stephen Sondheim, how will they really
"get" governmentese?    English is a contextually layered language.     

 

I can think of ten easy layers for almost any text that I work with in
English.    That problem gave the Master composer, George Friedrich Handel,
a nightmare and caused him to invent the oratorio since his English wasn't
so good either.    You should observe ordinary non-Americans trying to
contextualize a Ned Rorem song since Ned does understand layering and picks
really hard poets for really hard layered music. 

 

CONTEXT: 

 

Almost every English word has three denotative and four connotative
meanings.     Every word!   Such is the basis for the great English poets
and their "heron priested shores."    

 

There are also general colloquial interpretations.    Whether Canadian,
British, Irish, Welsh, Scottish, Australian,  OED or American, definitions
of some words are wildly out of sync with each other across borders.
(Haven't we been here before on this list?)   (Could someone give us a
discussion on the meaning of Pig-malian?)     The most recent example
(before Pig-malian) was my use of "Bull Shit", which no one got, since
Cherokees don't "swear" (don't see the use of it!)  but we play with words
including English for metaphorical purposes.   

 

The use of the word was not a curse but a poetic metaphor that had a virtual
blossoming of meanings flowing up from the vulgar into the common and even
into the pseudo polite.   (Did any of you ever hear a Scandinavian model say
bull shit in English, as a second language?    It's strangely polite, sort
of like hearing Pierre Bernac say merde or Joseph Heller call his character
in Catch 22,  "Lieutenant Scheisskopf.")    

 

I'm reminded of T.S. Eliot's favorite phrase when confronted with academic
misunderstandings.   My Cherokee Elder quoted him to me from a lecture she
had heard at Vanderbilt University, after an English professor had delivered
a talk on the "Wasteland."   (No, not John Locke,  T.S. Eliot!)   Eliot said
and I concur:  "Bug Shit!"   All that to a 1940s group of Southern under
twenties in Nashville, Tennessee.   My old French Dictionary has merde and
my new American Heritage has "shit" but my 1986 OED has neither and neither
does my 2nd edition Webster from my college days.   My German dictionary
doesn't have either Heller or the English.   Could we make a rule that
dictionaries, other than French and American,  generally are only in the
polite vernacular of the language since foreigners really don't know how to
cuss properly?  

 

Flowing from the dictionaries we can say that all English falls under one of
three categories.      "Polite,"  "Generic (or "common") and "vulgar."
Dictionaries are generally polite and generic since generic or obvious
common meanings are the root of "denotative."    The Latin base language
originally had Classical Latin and Vulgar/common Latin.     According to the
Latin text books, "vulgar" and "common" were originally one and the same.
Otherwise why call it the "Vulgate?"   And what about Dante who wrote the
"Divine Comedy" in Vulgar Latin (old Italian)?   Dante is called, by our
generic Wikipedia (vulgar?), "the Father of the Italian Language" because he
used the vulgar for high art.    (Medieval Rap?)  

 

Today, many European languages have a polite "high speech" an ordinary
speech and a colorful or vulgar speech.    As Dante proved, Latin works
written in the Vulgar became a kind of linguistic fertilizer to feed and
renew the creativity of the polite.   

 

In music:  Stravinsky's  "Rite of Spring" was vulgar while Bizet's Carmen
was both "vulgar" and "vul-ner-able."     Both changed the music and opera
of their day for the better.   Both were vulnerable to the critics of the
day.    Vul, the morpheme meaning wound.    The Latin Vul-gate on one level
is a wound to the sacred language which bleeds into the common language
spoken on the street.   The wound of the mother is the name of a part of
feminine anatomy.    In fact most European languages have some version of
this.    That three part linguistic form is the basis for Martin Buber's
great theological/artistic tract  "Ich und du" or "I and Thou."      

 

On a more profane level you could draw a parallel to Bill Clinton's
apology/non-apology for his "to be or not to be" sexual encounter with
Monica Lewinsky.     You can read your own dictionaries for the classical
definition of whether sex happened or not.     (All of the dictionaries I
found agreed with Clinton.)  Which makes my point.   Remember dictionaries
are almost 100% polite in English.    But the Republican insistence that
Clinton hadn't apologized is interesting linguistically.  Here are Clinton's
words: 

 

I did have a relationship with Miss Lewinsky that was not appropriate.   In
fact, it was wrong.   It constituted a critical lapse in judgment and a
personal failure on my part for which I am solely and completely
responsible.. I misled people, including even my wife. I deeply regret
that... Now, this matter is between me, the two people I love most -- my
wife and our daughter -- and our God.    I must put it right, and I am
prepared to do whatever it takes to do so.

 

 

This speech was a carefully crafted "polite English" apology.     What the
Republicans wanted from him was a "vulgar English apology" probably to show
that he was a common hick from Arkansas.     Sort of the reverse of George
Bush who was extremely polite and appropriate, came from one of America's
oldest families,  but used vulgar generic hick colloquialisms  even in major
speeches.   (Can you believe how these two parties reverse mirror each
other?)   Clinton spoke in the polite language of the American South but
they wanted what his Illinois born wife called "the old hound dog."    It
couldn't have been better if they had asked for a hip-hop version of the
speech.   Vulgar is an interesting word.   It comes from vul or wound.
Vul-ner-able. 

 

We lose languages through abuse or through conquest as if human
consciousness was unimportant and philosophical psycho-linguistic discovery
of no utlity.    This week a list member sent me a DVD of the Wampanoag
people who had lost their language for seven generations but it had been a
ghost that haunted and ruined their lives as they could not express who they
were in the dead noun language of English.    The language was out of sync
with every movement of their perceptual apparatus formed over thousands of
years.    (Not a hierarchy Keith!,  There are no higher or lower languages.)
A young Wampanoag  woman went to MIT and bonded with a psycho-linguistics
professor who encouraged her to collect the shards.   She found people who
remembered this and that but it was the discovery that her ancestors had
adapted the language to writing and had written bundles of materials
defending themselves against the English theft and genocide, much as
Sequoyah did for my people that gave her the door into retrieving the
language.   Unlike the Cherokees, the Wampanoags under the first wave
immigrants were buried by the Catholic missionaries who beat the language
out of their children because the nuns couldn't learn Wampanoag.     This
young woman dug up the bundles and translated the texts and took the shards
and taught the children and the ghosts are ghosts no longer.   They are not
haunted but like the Jews speaking the dead language of Hebrew at the advent
of Israel, they have arisen from the dead.    Now that's a real miracle.  

 

What does this have to do with the release of diplomatic posts?     I
suspect all these will do is get a bunch of little people killed for
cooperating with Americans and strengthen the recruiting for the enemies of
America.   I don't believe they will have the linguistic sophistication to
accept what is normal everywhere and understand the principle of diplomatic
immunity and how it relates to language.     America has created this mess
when they hung Rudolf Streicher for saying things that encouraged murder and
then allowed Americans to do the same down to the present as "free speech."
One should never forget that the Art of America is Commerce and Commerce is
without morals far more than diplomacy.   

 

The world is filled with systems that have been at war with each other for
thousands of years.    The systems jockey with each other for the good of
their own systems.    I suspect that what we are on the way to here,  is a
total shutdown of information and the opening of  trials for sedition and
treason.   It will make all of us less free and even lists,  like this list,
an area for suspicion. 

 

REH

 

PS Gail,  I'm working on your question.    Thank you for your comments and
the question.   Ray

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Gurstein
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 6:23 PM
To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME
DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'; [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] FW: [NetBehaviour] Download The Wikileaks U.S. Embassy
Cable Data

 

220 / 251,287 (and growing)

 


cables seem to be available here:

 

http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/ 

 

it should be an interesting few weeks/months

 

M 

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to