Ray, what I like about your postings is that they make us think differently.  
We have try to take a different view of the world in discussions with you and 
that isn't easy.  It's a view I encountered in working with Indians in northern 
Canada.  They simply didn't see things the way we do.  We may not like it, but 
like you, many of them viewed the economy we imposed on them as a cancer.  In 
Canada and the rest of the Americas our economic system has converted societies 
that fended for themselves as farmers or hunter-gatherers into indigent rural 
and urban (e.g. Winnipeg) slum dwellers.  We see our economy as providing for 
us and driving our lives; they know it as something that has obliterated them.

There are also less onerous things I like about your postings.  As an artist, 
you keep reminding us of the place of the arts in civilization.  And at times 
you take us well off the beaten path, like when you remind us that  "It's a 
serious question whether the world really exists or whether we just dream it 
and we are the dream together."  Well yes Ray, perhaps that is where we are.  
And perhaps we should start thinking that way, at least a little.

So do keep posting.

All the best,
Ed

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ray Harrell 
  To: Ed Weick ; Ed Davey ; Darryl or Natalia ; Gail Stewart ; Robert Stennett 
; Michael Gurstein ; Mike Spencer ; Selma Singer ; Sandwichman 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 8:41 AM
  Subject: FW: [Futurework] Epigenesis -- was Indian prejudice [Off list]


   

  Hello folks,  I posted both of these but they did not get on,  this grew out 
of Gail's question. 

   

  If you don't want it just delete,  REH

   

  If Canada is going to find their way through the various cultural "paradigms" 
that each immigrant group represents, isn't it important that you learn to talk 
to and live with the group that is oldest with you and has been here the 
longest?   We are easy.   If you can't deal with us, how can you hope to deal 
with the tough Chinese as they come?   

   

  I admit that there are differences, that all life is local, and my lessons 
are local to my teachers, family and community.   Others will build their 
houses slightly differently but traditional people generally are more "touched 
by the world" than "touching the world."   We then take that information, 
meditate on it and create the world individually and together.   More about 
that later. 

   

  Thank you Gail for the compliment in your post,  I will try to deserve it.   
I can't speak for other Indians  but I can confront your question from what I 
have been taught by my teachers and my culture and family.    You asked a 
couple of serious questions which I will answer as I'm able.     

   

  How can the future of work be determined if there are such incredible 
differences in what that means between immigrant and First Nations groups?   
How can there not be an Indian economics?    Is there a concept of work amongst 
Indians and what is its purpose and intent?    Anyone who knows Indians well 
know that we are continually busy and enjoy it.   When that gets frustrated as 
the children grow, too often take the way out by drugs and suicide.   Reset the 
button.   Start over again.  

   

  Let me start this off  with Gail's question about the meaning of economics to 
a traditional community.   

   

  For many Indian People the western concept of Economics, as a core value of 
the system of culture, is best signified as a cancer growing on the society 
that devours the meaningful areas of life for its own purposes.    Cherokees 
like rocks.  Crystals are important sources of information for us.   From the 
telestial "mineral" world of the crystals we would say that economics is 
"epigenetic" on the body of culture. (tip my hat to Keith for the word)  

   

  Economists would call economics and trade, the "engine."   We do not.   We 
always had plenty of trade and we loved a good market but we call the will to 
grow (learn) and live, the engine and energy that feeds the system of life.   
The natural world is our bible and the systems of the natural world gives us 
our identity as people through relationship.    We are concerned with the "Way 
of Right Relationships."    Through relationship we all evolve the world 
together from the information sent to us and recognized by us through the 
senses.    That's why advanced virtuosic perceptivity and the human instrument 
is such a high value for us.   The purpose of work is the evolution of 
competency or individual personal virtuosity. 

   

  We say we have always been here because the spirit is eternal and belongs to 
the cosmos, the Great Mystery.   We have always been here!    Economics to 
eternality is irrelevant.    To destroy the world, which is the garden where we 
learn, our schoolroom, for the sake of terrestrial temporality is pathological. 
   To make a world conceived in beauty in the minds of millions of spirits 
meditating on creation into a thing of ugliness is..sick.     The best metaphor 
is a "cancer" turned against the consciousness that gives it life.   Perhaps 
this maybe the reason the Chief told Gail that he didn't have economics he had 
life.   

   

  With us, we like things in fours.   Morning, noon, evening, night.  Spring, 
summer, autumn, winter.  childhood, adolescence, maturity, old age, etc.    We 
say there are four primary choices in life.   You choose your god, (your core 
value),  your mate (the value of relationship and family), your work (the 
development of your competency) and your play (the following of the ways of 
creativity.   English says it "re-creation.")   The world is dreamed by the 
Creator, maintained by the spirits including us, and is the classroom where we 
learn why we decided to be born in the first place.    We say, "why we jumped 
down." 

   

  Instead of trading in order to live more full and comprehensive lives for the 
purposes outlined above,  the West seems involved in trade as a virtuosic art 
form for its own sake.    Instead of work as the effort expended fulfilling the 
promise of individual wisdom and growth, it is turned to simple sustenance and 
the meaning of life becomes simple gathering and ownership.   Making that an 
Art is a waste of both Art and personhood in our way of looking at "person."    
We call that ayvwiyah or "real personhood." 

   

  The only safe use of such a discipline, as the virtuosic Arts, is found in:

  ·         the abstract arts which develops the human perceptual instrument. 

  ·         the art of education which develops the children, 

  ·         the art of healing which rebalances the psycho-physical dysfunction 
of individuals and 

  ·         the Art of Spirituality which gives us a pursuit of the ultimate 
meanings of existence.    

   

   

  When anything else becomes an Art it is dangerous.   The Art of war for 
example.     

  ·         Peace should be an  Art for it is the positive process of life but 
war should never be. 

  ·         War as an artistic process is the process of an ever evolving 
death.   

   

  So what is the dialogue that we have with Islam around the concept of Jihad?  
 How about Komm, süsser Tod of the Christians?   
  Words mean something.    Words lead to facts.     Facts are mutual 
agreements.    The world is created with dialogue and mutual agreements.    
Many of your Indian neighbors will not even think of the world as "out there."  
  I don't.     We create the world from the material sent by the Infinite to 
our limited perceptual instrument and negotiate its meaning with each other 
through words and thought.    The rule of law.   The "world" is us plus 
implications of us.  (Note that I did not say that we were the "Universe."    
The "world" is human.   Every species has a different "world" or as we say 
"Medicine."   To the bee the "Medicine"  is, to our best understanding 
Octagonal.)    Agreements come and go and science changes as people live and 
die.   The world doesn't stay the same.   It's a serious question whether the 
world really exists or whether we just dream it and we are the dream together.  
   Artists in the west understand the rules.   Thoughts have power in the arts. 
  Works of art have their life and consciousness and even desires.    Cause and 
effect is supreme.    A conductor begins by asking what the piece wants us to 
know.   The sculptor "listens" to the stone.   What did Van Gogh "see?" 

   

  Art demands total commitment.    Buber said rightfully I think, that once you 
choose an Art, everything is sacrificed on the altar of that art for the 
purpose of the fulfillment of the values of it. (its "Medicine")    So when 
Hitler sought the Art of blood lineage his ultimate end was what we all shared 
as a result of making one's genes a work of Art with its sister Archeology.     
Together they were the demon twins and murdered millions but they weren't the 
first.  But this is not about that.   It's about the principle of the function 
of Art and its purpose in the human psyche and society.   Particularly since 
the modern economists even use the term the "Art of Money" when they speak of 
the purity of their quest.

   

  The Art of the invisible hand of the marketplace, like the windigos in the 
woods, has no place for the individual of any species.    And yet every spirit 
in every species is special, eternal  and has purpose to the Infinite Mind, 
what we call the Grandfather/Grandmother.    

   

  Art is pure process and the sole purpose is the evolution of the virtuosity 
of the Artist (the values) in the medium that the process is being used..   
Because it is a human process it cares little for the spirit and is solely 
concerned with its perfection and evolution.      Such Arts are the roots of 
humans sacrificed and that has happened in this place before.   Today the 
wealthy dream the sacrifice of the unemployed.      The entities of human 
sacrifice  still circle this continent and both hemispheres.     

   

  I suspect an Aztec reborn in Europe would be called an Artist as would an 
Inka.     Machu Picchu is an amazing immense stone sculpture the second largest 
in the history of the world.    It mattered not that the empire disappeared in 
a little more than one century.     It's a whole mountain thousands of feet 
high sculpted as a living being, but the largest is in Columbia where the 
mountain is so high that it catches all of the growing levels of altitude on 
the planet in one immense Sculpture Garden. 
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0410/feature3/index.html

  Very few people even know it exists.    It is a supreme work of agriculture 
and urban planning as an Art form but even these great Artists sacrificed their 
defense against the Spanish for the sake of completing their art work.    

   

  Alas,  Art is a bad model for the human life.     You should do your Art to 
live not live to do your Art.     Art is a biological evolutionary tool of 
life, not a purpose.      The Art of America is Economics.    You should be 
very afraid.   I am.    But the world is changing.   The classroom is evolving 
and it presents another challenge.    The challenge for us to cooperate and 
live or die alone and be recycled like trash.

   

  Thank you Gail, Natalia, Ed and everyone.   Hope this was not too strange for 
you.   

   


  REH

   

   

  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
  Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:41 PM
  To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'; 'Keith Hudson'
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] Epigenesis -- was Indian prejudice

   

  I would only like to add that the whole meaning of celebrating multi 
culturalism and celebrating diversity is the recognition of difference.  
Different cultures.  Different racial groupings.  Someday the world will be 
color blind.  How that will happen I really don't know but I hold it as an 
article of faith.  

   

  We have to go on knowing that people have discriminated and will do so again 
in the future.  Stupid jokes and insensitivity will happen.  As Goldwater said 
"we can't legislate morality". 

   

  But an enlightened society can and will deal with those who promote hate or 
those who cause harm to others just because they are different in some way: 
race, gender, sexual preferences, etc.  This much is different from the past 
that you experienced.   So Never Again applies to more than one racial grouping 
or religion it can and should apply to all groupings. 

   

  Arthur

   

   

   

  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
  Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 6:12 PM
  To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'; 'Keith Hudson'
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] Epigenesis -- was Indian prejudice

   

  Ray, at some level we are all racists, by this I mean sensitive to the 
differences we encounter when we go outside our usual communities.  And yes 
there is stereotyping.  I think that the tendency to stereotype goes hand in 
hand with our tendency to look for patterns just about everywhere.

   

  Ray I know that your people have suffered and you have written eloquently 
about that situation.  We are not going to change human nature anytime soon.  
And shedding tears over what has happened is not going to change the past.  
(this applies to the whole human catastrophe, including the Holocaust)  

   

  Arthur

   

   

   
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to