Good article. I keep seeing landfill sites full of plastic Barbie dream 
homes, patio furniture, Styrofoam and IKEA. Garbage tells a lot about 
priorities.
China is in the perfect position to be the leader and almost sole 
provider for green products and technology. The next consumer frontier, 
and the next must-have of all nations.

Natalia

On 12/3/2010 10:08 AM, Michael Gurstein wrote:
> http://www.bubblegeneration.com/2010/11/worst-trade-in-world.html
>
> Tuesday, November 30, 2010
> The Worst Trade in the World
>
> Umair Haque
>
> It's often said that America's an uncompetitive economy--unable to produce
> stuff that satisfies global demand. Hence, a yawning current account
> deficit.
>
>
> I'd say the reality's harsher. America's caught in a toxic, self-destructive
> relationship with the globe's second most significant economy. In short,
> it's making the worst trade in the world.
>
> The worst trade in the world is this: America doesn't export the stuff you
> might think a bellwether of the 21st century would--cutting edge assets,
> that power the global growth of emerging markets. Mostly, it exports
> industrial age raw materials and machines: literally plain old commodities.
> China finishes them up and "processes" them--and exports "consumer goods"
> right back to America. They're the trinkets and toys that are piled high on
> the bleak exurban shelves in super sizes--and America's pawned it's future
> for them.
>
> Consider America's top exports to China. Leaving aside aircraft and soybeans
> (neither a sustainable basis for national advantage), America's sole export
> of note is semiconductors. The rest? Plastics, steel, pulp, chemicals,
> copper, aluminum, engines, cotton--literally commodities. It's
> hypercommoditized raw materials, of the lowest of value--literally just
> stuff, far from higher value goods or services. It's not the picture of an
> economy humming with innovation, meaning, purpose--it's the picture of a
> junkyard.
>
> Consider, conversely, America's top imports from China. Here (apart from one
> trade of enduring worth--America exports semiconductors, and imports back
> computers, creating and capturing the lion's share of returns from a single
> high-value industry), the picture's even bleaker. "Other--household goods",
> toys, computer peripherals, apparel, footwear, TV's. America put itself in
> hock for disposable, rapidly commoditizing, self-destructive, depreciating
> stuff, discount-rack junk--literally the lowest of low-grade "consumer
> goods". Not assets that yield multiplying, long-run returns--the foundation
> of enduring, resilient, smart growth. It's not the picture of an economy
> that's investing in tomorrow: it's the picture of Black Friday in a big-box
> store.
>
> Together, here's what I suggest these two pictures show. It's the portrait
> of a doddering, faltering economy on it's last legs--one that's managing
> barely to eke out a living largely from the exorbitant privilege of
> yesterday's reserve currency (which lets it essentially leverage itself to
> the hilt). Instead of making awesome stuff the world beats down the door
> for--it literally lives on exporting hypercommoditized raw materials, and
> importing back the disposable, transient, depreciating junk mass-produced
> from them at the lowest cost incurred, and smallest value added. It's a
> portrait of an economy which adds little or no value to, well, much--and is,
> instead, surviving by emptying out the last dregs in yesterday's rusting
> industrial age cup.
>
> It is the worst trade in the world--and rebooting global prosperity depends
> on creating the institutions that underpin a better one.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to