December 31, 2010  NY Times

Career Shift Often Means Drop in Living Standards


By CATHERINE RAMPELL
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/catherine_ramp
ell/index.html?inline=nyt-per> 


Even the lucky ones are not so lucky, it seems. 

A new study of American workers displaced by the recession sheds light on
the sacrifices a large number have made to find work. Many, it turns out,
had to switch careers and significantly reduce their living standards. 

"In many cases, these people are not very happy," said Cliff Zukin,
professor of public policy and political science at Rutgers University
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/r/rutgers
_the_state_university/index.html?inline=nyt-org>  and one of the authors of
the study. "They're the winners who got new jobs, but they're not really
what they want, and not where they want to be." 

The study, conducted by the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce
Development at Rutgers, was based on a survey of Americans around the
country who were unemployed as of August 2009 and re-interviewed about their
job status twice over the next 15 months. 

As of November 2010, only about one-third had found replacement jobs, either
as full-time workers (26 percent) or as part-time workers not wanting a
full-time job (8 percent). 

And of those who successfully found work, 41 percent had switched into a new
career or field. 

Some of these may have been workers who retrained for new fields they wished
to enter, but many seem to have taken their new jobs out of desperation.
Only a minority of those displaced workers changing careers - 22 percent -
said they had taken a class or a training course before finding their new
job. 

"Look, I am really happy to have a job - that's the main thing," said Sue
Bires, 60, who was laid off from a job managing homeowners' associations in
Orlando, Fla., in September 2008. She initially had another job lined up
with a different realty association in Orlando, but when that fell through,
she moved to Austin, Tex., to stay with a friend. She filed for bankruptcy
and took a job at a call center. 

But she now earns $30,000, far below the $45,000 she was paid when she was
managing properties. 

"It's competitive out there, even for the lower paying jobs, especially when
you're 60 looking for a job in a young town," Ms. Bires said. "So I'm
grateful to have a job where the people are nice and I have a little bit of
flexibility in my hours. That's especially important now, since retirement
is looking like a long way off." 

Like Ms. Bires, most of those forced to switch careers generally seemed to
downgrade their job status. 

Nearly 7 in 10 of the survey's respondents who took jobs in new fields say
they had to take a cut in pay, compared with just 45 percent of workers who
successfully found work in their original field. 

Of all the newly re-employed tracked by the Heldrich Center, 29 percent took
a reduction in fringe benefits in their new job. Again, those switching
careers had to sacrifice more: Nearly half of these workers (46 percent)
suffered a benefits cut, compared with just 29 percent who stayed in the
same career. 

Many of those who found work in a different field say they have come to
terms with the limited opportunities, but they are reluctant to see their
new job as a calling. 

"I wouldn't go so far as to say I've switched careers, since I'm not exactly
sure this is a career, but I'm definitely doing something different," said
Adam Kowal, 30, of Royal Oak, Mich. 

After being laid off from a job as a quality control supervisor at a
department store warehouse and losing his house, he moved his family across
the state to live with his mother. Unable to find similar work, he initially
took a "soul-sucking" temporary job on an assembly line making auto parts,
and is now working in a kitchen at a high school. 

His hourly wage has fallen from $15 an hour at the warehouse to $10.50 an
hour washing dishes and preparing food, and he has gone from having health
insurance coverage for his whole family to no benefits. He, his pregnant
wife and their 4-year-old son are now on Medicaid
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/health/diseasesconditionsandhealthtopics
/medicaid/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> . 

"I'd love to go back to what I was doing," he said, or even into what he
described as his true passion, full-time screenwriting. "But when I talk
with the unemployment office here in Michigan, they tell me the chances of
going back and using the same skill set I had before are pretty farfetched."


 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to