Depressing. Particularly depressing when you consider that this is  
only what they're willing to tell us about & does not include  
classified capabilities (and/or deployments).

Barry


On Jan 2, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Arthur Cordell wrote:

>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ PFIR ] How long before DHS has "Gorgon Stare" above *our*  
> cities?
>
> This winter, the Air Force is set to deploy to Afghanistan what it  
> says is a
> revolutionary airborne surveillance system called Gorgon Stare,  
> which will
> be able to transmit live video images of physical movement across an  
> entire
> town.
>
> How long before DHS has "Gorgon Stare" above *our* cities?
> http://bit.ly/h1lJHN
>
>  (Google Buzz)
>
> - - -
>
> The Washington Post has an article today about the latest  
> surveillance toy
> ostensibly designed for military use abroad -- "Gorgon Stare" --  
> reportedly
> capable of aerial surveillance of an entire town or city.
>
> http://bit.ly/g9LnkQ  (Washington Post)
>
> Supposedly designed for immediate use in Afghanistan (where critics  
> contend
> "boots on the ground surveillance and contacts" may be far more  
> effective),
> the Post includes one "throwaway" line of particular note:
>
>   "The Department of Homeland Security is exploring the technology's
>    potential, an industry official said."
>
> Given U.S. authorities' continuing mantra that "we have no  
> expectation of
> privacy in public places" -- one can only imagine the salivating over
> technology like this that must already be taking place at DHS.
>
> In particular, this is a prime example of why people who spend their  
> time
> harassing Google over static satellite and Street View imagery (that  
> have
> very useful applications for ordinary consumers) are so far off  
> target.
>
> Real-time technologies like vast CCTV networks and Gorgon Stare,  
> capable of
> observing large areas and recording the resulting live data to be  
> held and
> used for indefinitely long periods, should be receiving our own  
> "stare" of
> criticism and concern.  These are the technologies so easily abused,  
> not
> static images of driveways and houses that are typically months or  
> even
> years old.
>
> --Lauren--
> Lauren Weinstein ([email protected])
> http://www.vortex.com/lauren
> Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
> Co-Founder, PFIR (People For Internet Responsibility): http://www.pfir.org
> Founder, NNSquad (Network Neutrality Squad): http://www.nnsquad.org  
> Founder,
> GCTIP (Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance):
>   http://www.gctip.org
> Founder, PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on
> Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/laurenweinstein
> Google Buzz: http://bit.ly/lauren-buzz
>
> _______________________________________________
> pfir mailing list
> http://lists.pfir.org/mailman/listinfo/pfir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to