For the list

It appears that only one other individual here has read and understood the article forwarded to M. G. by Anjana Basu on "*Change or Die*" from /Triumph of Content/. Rehashing of old ideas does not offer adequate or important change and as stated small changes may be easier to swallow but they will likely not be long lasting 'fixes' and most likely will fail to achieve what is truly necessary for continuation. That article (in a round about way), to me, speaks to the idea of governments offering basic income (as Sally has done for so long). As the 'elite' in society increases the stress of the 'lower mass consciousness' less and less productivity will occur. If the idea that B.I. will decrease the 'need to work for one's living' is a major stumbling block, then I must ask for the blinkers to be removed. Essentially no one likes to have to 'work' for one's living, but as others here have often pointed out, most people are always 'busy doing' something. The idea is to help people find what they enjoy doing and are therefore good at, and through positive encouragement, social and emotional help and community support allow local markets to grow and flourish.

Yes, this may mean that most large and international corporations may die. That is change. But local trade will increase. Will that mean a 'reduced lifestyle'? What will we reduce, the consumerism that large corp's need to exist?. Most of these things are not necessary to life. Advertising may wish us to assume so, but it is not so. Will that mean a redistribution of wealth? As I have been reading, much of that wealth is in printed paper -- a pipe dream. It may be better, in the long run, for the system here (and in business worldwide) to collapse, but only if a 'new' support system or 'local structure economic model' can be put in place reasonably fast. And this cannot be based upon that which has caused, and will cause again, another collapse through unmanageable greed.

To carry the 'negativity of fear' constantly through a society because one does not wish to upset the 'status quo' or one wishes to conserve the 'elitist power' can only lead to eventual disaster (the current banking and soon to be discovered 'stock exchange' fiascoes) that is only continuing because of bail-outs /(the quick pill)/.

Change it appears, as always, must come from the bottom. And that means revolution and the collapse of all that was with the unfortunate consequence of no 'newness' to the system. Just a repeat of rise, suppression, oppression and overthrow.




On 1/5/2011 5:49 AM, Arthur Cordell wrote:

We seem to be going back to an earlier era. We can see the problems but there is no ideological road map to guide us out of the "miserity" So we see the problems, write about them, but at a loss to know what to do.

Maybe universality and the middle class were really blips in the long road of history.

Arthur

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Keith Hudson
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 05, 2011 7:28 AM
*To:* RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, , EDUCATION
*Subject:* [Futurework] The rise of miserity

We're now living in a quantum world of superimposed states -- of Shrodinger's Paradox in which the cat is alive and not alive at the same time. Of inflation and deflation going on simultaneously. Of fabulous incomes for some but declining wages in real terms for most. Of enormous enhancements in efficiency but lower welfare for the needy. Of higher skills than ever before in history for some but of mass literacy and numeracy skills lower than a century ago. Of highly profitable multinational corporations but bankrupt governments. A new word needs to be coined -- "miserity".

Keith

Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/ <http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2010/12/>2011/01/
<http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2010/12/>


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to