In a weird way I understand and have practiced a lot of this to keep my
sanity and do my work.   It’s worked for a fifty year career in the
performing arts. 


REH


 


 


 
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anis-shivani/new-rules-for-writers_b_808558.h
tml> New Rules For Writers: Ignore Publicity, Shun Crowds, Refuse
Recognition And More 


 <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anis-shivani> Anis Shivani


These "rules" totally go against every prescription for writing success
you'll hear as a young writer from all quarters: the conformity-driven MFA
system, the publishing industry's hype-machine, successful writers who act
either like prima donnas or untouchable mystics, the marketing experts who
seek to impose advertising rules on the writing product. Overpaid editors,
illiterate agents, arrogant gatekeepers, and stupid reviewers want you to
bargain away your soul for a pittance -- the bids in the market escalate
downward, a reverse auction where you compete with the lowest of the low to
be acknowledged as an entity that counts. 

Why take part in the game at all? Who has ever come out of it alive, able to
set up tent and build followers on the other side? Why not accept the
reality that writers aren't forged in social harmony and peer input and
obedient fellowship, but in a region where madmen and insomniacs find no
comfort? To get you started on a regimen designed to pull you away from the
mother-teat of the writing industry, here are the ten commandments: 

1. Disobey the System. The system--from the MFA program to that fat-ass
editor sitting in glorious judgment over your manuscript--will never reward
originality. So fuck it! The more you humiliate yourself before it, shape
your writing, your lifestyle, your public persona, your habits of endearment
and hostility, according to what you think "they" want, the more it'll
ruthlessly crush you. The system is for the benefit of insiders--and you
don't get to be an insider by being an original. It's your choice: do you
want to be one of the Stepford writers, whatever your genre, or do you want
to issue a thunderous note of warning to all the establishment gatekeepers,
a resounding Fuck You, that will get you in no one's good books? Once you're
on everyone's shit list, then your mind will open up--visions you never
thought possible, leaps of imagination, idle curiosity revving up into high
gear--knowing that no one will ever be pleased by anything you write. 

The "system"--in all its manifestations--is in utter disrepair, decadence
rather. The only way to conquer it is to humiliate it. This goes against
everything you've heard, all the advice to play nice. But that gets you
nowhere. Or it gets you to a place where you do their bidding and become a
non-entity--precisely where they want you. This is the meaning of their
saccharine praise, when you've got to a point where they think they have a
handle on you. Confound them. Bewilder them. Disrespect them. Mock them.
"They" meaning all the authority figures in publishing. They'll come to your
door and bend on their knees and beg you to give them more of whatever it is
you're dishing out. You'll see, they love the humiliation and pain. They're
not into pleasure, and neither should you be. 

2. Ignore Publicity. Ah, publicity, you've been told you need it at any
cost, in whatever shape or form you can get it. Publicity is great, it puts
you in the public eye, it's how people get to know your work, it's why they
buy your book, it's why they want to follow you. Don't you need fans, don't
you need groupies? Publicity means that you tell the world you're going to
write a book, then tell them you've written it, then tell the world how good
it felt to have written it. There's always something to publicize whether or
not you're in the middle of a new book--even if you've never written a book,
and there's no chance you will, you can get forever enmeshed in the
publicity machine, and publicize yourself to extinction. Publicity, that
elusive bitch, keeping her own hours, never around when you call, raising
hell if you so much as dare to assert a trace of your lost manhood. 

Bullshit, I say, to all the claims made for publicity. The book will find
its readers. Your aim should be supreme indifference to making claims on
behalf of it. Do you want fans or do you want readers? Do you want to join
the canon, or do you want cannonballs shot in your praise?   Publicity lasts
for a moment, leaves a bad taste in the mouth, or no taste at all.   It
always abandons you at the altar, making you look like a fool, since you
were counting on it to be around for keeps.   What you need to chase
is--nothing!   Let the book's mystique, its unique indifference to reception
and value, chase you into immortality.   Let the book speak for you. Shut up
on its behalf.   Discern between getting lost in the pages of the book as
only you, the writer, can, and cheap whorish publicity. 

3. Shun Crowds. They're everywhere. You can't get away from them. They want
to tell you how to think for yourself. They're there to hold your hand when
your book founders, telling you it's happened to them too, it happens to the
best of them. They're there to watch that you don't deviate too far from
central headquarters, where assignments about fame and fortune were made
long before you came up (you didn't know that, did you?), where quotas are
allocated and supply orders dutifully filled and excess inventory banished.
They're there to make sure that you answer all the calls, that you're never
not to be found, that you make the right connections and the right gestures
at all the appropriate times. They're there, in short, to make sure that you
become a cipher, eminently forgettable just as soon as your books have been
issued to favorable publicity and positive reviews. 

You must get out of the crowd. It's the hardest thing to do. It's the
easiest thing to recreate, even in the midst of utter squalor and depravity.
The crowd searches you out no matter how hard you try to hide. It comes to
your door, dressed in beautiful holiday clothes, cameras around its necks,
high-fiving, jive-talking, wondering why you're sitting by yourself, alone
in your quarters, what's up with that? Can we just take a look at your
novel? Your poetry book? Hmmm. If you changed your plot to make it a little
less obscure? If you changed your poetry book to make it a little more
coherent? We can help get it published--faster, much easier than you can on
your own. Let's see, do you have Mondays and Wednesdays free? We'd like you
to teach this class--it'll only help your own writing. You spend too much
time with yourself. It's hard to write about divorce and parenthood and
death if you haven't experienced those things for yourself. The crowds will
take you to those places. And then you'll find there's nothing to write
about. You've lived through it all with them, a unit, a blob, a speck of a
point in a random rushing wave going nowhere. 

 

4. Seek Unemployment. This goes back to our Franklinian endowment, our
desperate impulse to occupy ourselves with practical stuff, feeling useful,
needed, employed like everyone else. This is the death of writing. Find ways
to be unemployed, doing nothing, finding enough time on your hands, after
you've met your basic needs, to wander into unknown realms of thought and
imagination. You can't do it when you're busy working like everyone else,
collecting a paycheck, keeping regular hours, depending on the goodwill and
collegiality of customers, coworkers, bosses--if you choose employment in
academia, it's no different, you still have clients and bosses to please.
Avoid this gentle poison by figuring out ways you can mock the system by
taking from it what it needs to give you to maintain your writing, and give
it nothing back in return. 

What it wants from you is your time--your only irreplaceable commodity, the
only thing you can't ever get back. Every minute spent teaching a student or
hiring out your talents in any other way is an insult to your writing
potential, and each such moment degrades you so that you can never attain
greatness. They're more than happy to give you a paycheck. Heck, there are
tens of thousands of writers "teaching" writing to others, dissatisfied with
their own work, and they wonder why? Refuse their devil's bargain. Refuse
them the blood and toil they want from you in return for allegiance. Work at
something that mocks the bourgeois idea of work, and make it pay off. You
don't have to work for nothing. You don't have to live on nothing. You just
have to figure out how to turn work on its head so it becomes a means to
feed your writing, not the other way around. Work is overrated. It's the
only overrated thing in the whole human realm. 

 

5. Converse Only with the Classics. Be swayed by no contemporary
reputations. Behind most of them are hype and deceit, the desperate
machinations of a system in need of validation of its own greatness. Treat
every contemporary with dire suspicion, until they stand they test of
time--and most of them won't, you'll see. Read no one living with attention
and gratitude, unless they've proven themselves in relation to your eternal
touchstones. Keep digging up the mocked and silenced and de-canonized, for
it is here you'll find most of the true gold to mine--divergent veins that
were too uncommon for their times, different perspectives than the consensus
outlook on a given period, experiments that petered out because they were
far ahead of the trends, unfinished trains of thought that you can leap onto
and claim as your own. And remember that no contemporary will ever let you
do that. If you climb on his bandwagon, he'll be looking to throw you off,
murder you with a pitchfork, and then as the party recedes in the distance,
he'll join his laughing companions and fail to report the little
disturbance. 

This is how vicious your contemporaries are. They're not dead yet. They
don't believe in death. They give off the aura of charlatans denying the
existence of death, which taints their writing with platitude and cliché,
and makes them constantly run into dead-ends. Most of them are at the same
dead-end they found themselves at when they were twenty-five or thirty, and
not even the smartest ones realize where they are. You will learn nothing
from them. Your job as a writer is to discover something no one else has yet
laid claim on. You need to be insensitively myopic and farsighted at the
same time, train your eyes on denied possibilities while refusing traffic
with anyone equipped to pass judgment on your work. And for that you must
revert to Pound or Dickens or Dostoevsky or Sterne or Defoe or whoever is
far enough back in time to have shed the ugly smell of death. Your objective
is to find life in death and vice versa, and your contemporaries are not yet
dead enough to know that. Read all your contemporaries. Take none of them
seriously. 

 

6. Refuse Recognition. At first they'll shun you--you'll know then that
there's a glimmer of a chance there's something good about you. (If you find
acceptance easily and quickly, without much resistance, there's nothing in
these commandments for you--you're beyond help.) They'll try to burn you,
destroy you, invalidate you, discredit you, call you a son of a bitch within
your hearing, pin a donkey's tail on you as soon as you turn your back, and
they'll pretend it's all in the service of literature, they'll feel good
about their indispensability as they do it. But this phase doesn't last
long, if you have any talent at all. Then they want to recognize you out of
existence. They want to give you jobs, awards, chairs, trips, holidays,
labels, whatever feeds your ego, whatever makes you believe you're one of
them. Refuse them in the strongest terms possible. 

You should thrive not on recognition and acceptance, but absolute misery and
discomfort, the haunting sense that you have failed your art, failed it at
every level possible, failed at it so miserably that it would have been
better had you never been born. Recognition means you've been told you're
good by the only people utterly disqualified to judge the matter.
Recognition means you must now play by the rules. Recognition means there's
a price to pay. You want to be as far away from the scene of the crime as
possible. You don't want to acknowledge that you wrote that novel or book of
poetry, you want to observe it from an impossible distance, as though you
were a god, and dashed off the book in innocent clamor. You don't want to be
around when rewards and punishments are passed around. You don't believe in
religious faith of any kind. You have no sense of right or wrong, because
that is what recognition amounts to. 

 

7. Don't Pursue a Niche. You're told, in every dimension of life, find a
niche, find your own little corner, and become really good at it. Find that
unique voice of yours, stemming from your involuntary pain and pleasure,
find it and hold on to it and dispense it with greater and greater intensity
until the end of your writing life. Don't do it. Be all over the place. The
only way to expand the boundaries of your art is if you recognize no
specialties. Try your hand at things you're sure you'll fail at. Find the
most ludicrous, nonsensical, absurd ventures to spend/waste your time at,
and you'll discover unforeseeable payoffs. As soon as you get good at one
branch of writing, shoot off from it, leave it behind, disown it if you
must, to get your sense of discomfort back. Jump between eras and
worldviews, rush so far along a byway that you discover a new road
altogether, making common cause with your former enemies and denouncers. 

Critics appreciate more than anything superficiality, the familiar, the
well-known and predictable. They don't know what to do with the new. You
must be new to yourself each day. From time to time, insult those within
your close coteries, so you can be free of the attachments, the labels, the
niches, they're vainly trying to assign you. From time to time, become a
blank vessel, as though your writing life hasn't started yet, and you're
staring at the abyss, all but ready to take the plunge. From time to time,
commit suicide. Sully your art with contamination, obvious contamination, so
hideous no sane writer wants to go near the stench. You'll discover, in the
dilution and addition, new factors of strength. Before you know it, you'll
have left your niche behind, and the universe will be at your feet again. 

 

8. Aim for Zero Audience. You're supposed to have a keen, appreciative,
well-trained, affectionate, loyal audience--one that "gets" you, gets what
you're all about, your aims and ambitions, your motivation and biography,
how you fit into the circle, what chair belongs to you and at exactly how
many minutes past ten it'll be your turn to speak at the table. Every
audience ever known to man is stupid. It's stupid because it takes itself
seriously. No great writer ever wrote for the audience at hand. And if you
can't know your audience when you create, that's almost the same as saying
that there is no audience at all. Is the audience your inner critic? You
should have silenced that voice before you ever started writing. Criticism
is for others, not for your own work. Your own work flows from passion and
madness, not theories of completion and harmony and perfection. Is the
audience a super-intelligent one, as well-read as you, as biographically
diverse and adventurous as you, as restless for newness and experiment and
reality as you? You should have killed that audience before you started
writing, because why write for someone just like you? Where's the excitement
in that? 

Is your audience the future? Is it the past? Is it the pantheon of writing
gods, with vast legions of devotees at their feet? How can any of these be
true, when you don't know the first thing about the art of writing? You will
be a beginner until the day you die, you will have mastered nothing, you
will be vanishing into nothingness without the most basic grasp on technique
and manipulation. You write for no audience. You don't even write for
yourself, you don't write for anything outside the bounds of the story
you're putting on the page, to make sense to itself and only its
compulsions. The rest will take care of itself. 

 

9. Accept Failure. Aim for success! Aim not just for competence, but
mastery, you're told. This is the most unfair of all the traps laid out for
the trusting writer. Success can't be bad, can it? It makes you feel good,
and pushes you to do more. We don't believe in the downer of failure as a
culture, so why should writing be immune to the principle? Jonathan Franzen
is successful. Sharon Olds is successful. They're both very successful at
what they do. They wouldn't know what to do with failure. They're competing
with their contemporaries, and with contemporary reality, and with
contemporary measurements, and coming off very well, according to all
"objective" criteria. They have perfected certain techniques, they have
staked out their territory and driven away the enemies and the beasts, and
now they want to invite you into their cozy home to reminisce about how they
got to success. But you must not follow their dirty footsteps. You must see
that their houses are built on the quicksand of approval and
contemporaneity, and will sink into the earth as soon as their moment
passes.

Never for a moment should you think of yourself as successful. You are
always a failure, and the better you write, the more you fail, because now
the gap between accomplishment and ideal is growing bigger, not smaller. You
fail because in your desperation to discover a new language you have only
discovered faint echoes of your own disjointed claims.   All the languages
are known and written and fantastically choreographed; all the words and
descriptions are sketched out in perfect museum pieces, and there's nothing
you can do about it.   You have failed because language is such an enormity
of gesture, so universal in its talents to defeat you, that even silence
would have been better, as you now realize at the end of it all. 

 

10. Think Small. Think big, they tell you. There is that niche. Go and
exploit it and become the biggest and best at it, become the indisputable
master. There is that genre waiting for you, go at it, dig deep, embellish
it, and see if there isn't something you can claim as all your own,
something large and sizable and noticeable from a distance. But that's
wrong. If you know the greats, you abase yourself, you humiliate yourself,
you degrade yourself, finding that narrow ledge on the barred window, that
tiny square inch of space on the mantelpiece, that forlorn patch of ground
Novelist X or Poet Y forgot to tread on, and you look at it as though at
revelation, and then squish yourself into that space, make yourself fit into
it, compress your size, compress your bigness, compress your voluntary
servitude into that unknowable scale of finitude, so that you become
nothing, less than an atom, disappeared as into a black hole, never to be
found again. 

No one will be able to see you, yet you will be able to--within that
apparent confined space, which is not a space of imagination or truth, but a
space of identity, your home turf--leap and cross and mix and marry
impossible legacies of language. You will never exit that space once you're
in it, yet to the outside it'll seem like you're everywhere. What
"successful" writers do in terms of abasement and worship with masters and
bosses in the contemporary realm, you will be pursuing in that zero space
where there is infinity of silence, and absolutely zero expectation of
reward at the end. You won't know who you are until you dare to erase
yourself in that space. You won't need mirrors and you won't need platforms.
You will have canceled out pleasure and pain, you will have freed your art
from the murderous clutches of either emotion. 

Anis Shivani is the author of Anatolia and Other Stories
<http://www.amazon.com/Anatolia-Other-Stories-Anis-Shivani/dp/0615281826/ref
=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1294936571&sr=8-2>  (2009). His new books are Against
the Workshop: Provocations, Polemics, Controversies (July 2011) and The
Fifth Lash and Other Stories (forthcoming, 2011). His just finished novel is
called The Slums of Karachi. 

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to