on henry dawes and the american culture,

 

in the 1880s the politician henry dawes

visited the cherokee nation in oklahoma

where there was no poverty and

more than a little wealth

as well as universal education,

health care

and suffrage.

 

not a person was in debt,

everyone owned their own house.

more than a few were mansions,

some were millionaires,

today they would be

considerably more than millionaires.

 

all of this in a population of under 50,000 people. 

dawes reported back to washington

that they were followers of henry george

and would never progress further

until the "common" was broken up and 

"every person learned the virtue of selfishness"

which dawes considered

to be the root of all human progress.

 

ten years later the federal government

used dawes' report

not only to justify

breaking up the cherokee lands

but to dispossess all indigenous nations

of their lands

and self government.

 

they created the state of oklahoma

and after giving a pittance

to each indian citizen

they dispersed the rest in a land rush

to the local alien european "immigrants"

and former african slaves.

 

after the state of oklahoma was formed

it was the cherokee lawyers

who formed the oklahoma bar association

and not the "immigrants."

 

the same was true for the medical doctors,

teachers and

the state's baptist newspaper

which all came from the then defunct

cherokee nation and culture. 

i asked several years ago how we

(my cherokee ancestors)

were followers of henry george,

and his california follower explained it.

 

however, 

i would say that henry george

was "following" us

considering that our structure was older

but nonetheless

it did seem to be the same.

 

george was our "nephew" and not

a very sophisticated nephew at that!

dawes was at least right about that.

 

i did not realize

how hostile american society

was to george in the 1890s. 

i would suggest that it might behoove economists

to study the cherokee nation

from 1846 to the

congressional curtis dissolution act

in the 1890s.

 

they could learn just why

global corporations and

the information revolution

are such delicate affairs.

 

that it is the foreign policy of governments

that have destroyed

the best ideals of

utopian thought and schemes.

 

companies do not have that possibility

even when they have yearly budgets

that exceed the budgets

of most world governments.

 

indeed china has a limited gdp

but its land and people mass

could obliterate bill gates small universe

if he was placed in competition

without outside governmental help 

going to gates. 

would the soviet union have collapsed

if it had not had a virtual embargo

by the west for almost

the entire seventy years 

of its existence?

how about cuba?

 

have we had a fair competition

with any of the communist systems

compared to the capitalists

without government embargo and

military pressures applied

thus far on both sides?

 

do we truly know

the potential of either?

do we truly know

what is better

for the whole life network

of the planet? 

there is very little atrocious practice

by any of the communist countries

that was not practiced by this country

in its first seventy years of existence.

 

would the u.s. have collapsed on itself

if it had not committed genocide

for its frontier expansion and

had first an owned work force

from the beginning invasion to 1860

and then an oppressive apartheid policy

to protect the european minority

in the south from 1865 to 1954? 

would the south have been america's chechnya?

with hostile legislatures elected 

by the black majority across the south 

and thus driven the europeans

north, west and east?

 

would these reverse carpetbaggers

have created a hostile underclass

(in the north, west and east)

that would have devoured the democracy

from within its white ranks and

created the kind of cynical laissez faire attitude

that is prevalent in russia today

but without the cultural glue

thus driving the wealthy

back to europe from whence they came? 

well,

just some thoughts on these issues,

i would suggest that another "traditional" process

might be in order for many of the problems

that have been discussed thus far.

 

recently there has been

a revival of religious programming in the u.s.

with even the medical profession suggesting that prayer,

can heal people who are connected to each other. 

this might seem strange to some

that i would suggest a possible answer

within such a thought

but nonetheless i am offering the thought.

 

it is said that meditation

is the highest form of prayer

amongst my people.

 

i would suggest a meditation

on the balance of things

for this society.

 

meditate on your neighbors,

not from the standpoint of conversion

to your way of thought,

but with the idea that a healthy neighbor

is less likely to be a destructive one.

 

if you pray for the balance of human societies,

the health of their children and

the development of their potential

and then you do the same

for the rest of life on the earth

and for the earth itself,

then at least within yourself

you will grow more aware.

 

and who knows what will happen

if we all grow more aware

and less anesthetized

by both the pace and demands

that we have decided to dream into place

up until the present?

 

the last undoing of the old "hired hand"

on the assembly line that henry ford instituted.

ford used buddhist and reincarnation metaphors

for his workers.

 

"work" was to hire the hands,

home was for the mind

and family values.

"put in the time!"

 

time spent on the assembly line

may very well constitute

an alpha brain meditative state

of heightened awareness.

 

an artist friend of mine, who
was losing her eyes,

used the job of "short order cook"

to work with the issues of "letting go"

of the artist obsession with perfection.

 

she told me that at a certain point
she entered into a meditative flow

where she had heightened awareness
and attention but a calm,

contentment and relaxation.

 

if work for these people

constitutes what is called

a "peak experience" or

"one's best experience of

shallow simple virtuosity,

performance in terms of feelings

of ease and mastery of execution,

joy in working, confidence, loss of ego,

and a sense of oneness with the job"

(which is what the ford assembly line had),

then you might have a problem that only

a military educational solution would solve.

i simply raise the question.

 

REH 2011

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to