Sorry, I forgot the rules, apologize arthur, harry and ed:   Here is my
argument.

 

1.       Without the Unions the Corporations would run roughshod over all of
us.    There would be no other side to the argument.  Just corporate
uncontrolled abuse, supported by the sold out Supreme Court's monochromatic
grayness. 

2.       Are you seriously suggesting that the Union with such a small
membership has the financial power of the corporate market?   How come they
can't get worker's taxes lowered?

3.       Benefits are in lieu of salary.   Let labor take the equivalent in
salary and purchase their own medical through the union.   No?   Of course
not.  What do you think we are Harry?     I've worked in the private market
for forty years as management of a small business.   I know the tricks.
Maybe you think everyone else doesn't?   I can't imagine them not knowing
these simple accounting tricks to save a few shekels on the backs of labor. 

4.       "Teacher's salaries at the high end.."   That means old teachers
who have been forced to go to school and get advanced degrees and are now
expensive labor.   Of course every administrator wants to fire their Master
Teachers and hire cheap help.   It's been that way since my father taught me
the trick in the 1950s at Picher.     Simple minded Harry.   Do you really
think that a list this sophisticated wouldn't know these little immoral
dodges? 

 

PS the salary for the average church organist in NYCity is $70,000.    Now
what does that have to do with the organist in Ross Corners New Jersey?

Is the Ross Corners organist paid too much? 

 

5.       Air Traffic Controllers.    Illegal Strike NOT over money but over
extreme working conditions.    It was illegal.   Can we say that refusing to
pay for contracted services to labor is ALSO illegal?   Of course not.  The
government makes its own rules.   Just ask any Indian. 

6.       As far as I'm concerned, the refusal to pay for the benefits is a
breach of contract and should be settled under binding arbitration.   Union
Members have had to submit to binding arbitration and many have lost their
retirements and medical over technicalities.   I know them in my line of
work.  Years of contributions thrown away through BINDING arbitration.
(Read about the Green Bay Lockout also in today's NYTimes.    The double
bind for a community that is both management and labor in the same people.)


7.       Make the governor and the people's government submit to the same
binding arbitration the labor citizen is forced to follow.

 

Enough!

 

REH

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 4:04 PM
To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,
EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] The growing US war against public sector unions:

 

garbage

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Harry Pollard
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 3:30 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] The growing US war against public sector unions:

 

Ed,

 

There is another point of view.

 

Over the years, the public service unions have carried on an unholy alliance
with Democratic politicians. They use their enormous receipts extracted
compulsorily from members to finance the politicians who decide their wages
and conditions.

 

(The major New Jersey union collects $1 million a year from its members.)

 

If the politicians provide robust benefits to the union they get large sums
to help their re-election.

 

It's a comfortable arrangement and benefits - for example in Wisconsin - are
almost as much as their pay. A favorite ploy is to get a little bill passed
that changes 50% contribution each from employee and state to 100% from the
state. In California, pensions are so high it is estimated that in a few
years the entire tax take from Californians will be spent on pensions.
Nothing for potholes!

 

They have simply gone too far.

 

The reason for ending collective bargaining in Wisconsin is obvious. If some
changes are made in the too high benefits a couple of years will go by and
then the people will be held to ransom again by collective bargaining. If
the Democrats are back in charge they are likely to be bought off by the
unions and Wisconsin will be back in financial trouble again.

 

I say 'held to ransom'. This, because we rely on government workers to keep
our environment working. When a private worker goes on strike, it is between
him and the boss. If government workers go  on strike, our schools close,
our houses burn, we could be mugged, and garbage piles high and unhealthy at
the curbs.

 

In the famous case of the air traffic controllers, the threat was to shut
down air traffic. All I can remember now of their demands is they wanted the
same pay for a controller out in our desert airport with perhaps 2 or 3
planes a day as a controller at LAX dealing with hundreds of planes. 

 

If they were trying to get a living wage, one could be sympathetic. But they
want much more and threaten closure of essential services to get it. The
controllers threatened to stop all air traffic.

 

The average Milwaukee public-school teacher salary is $56,500, but with
benefits the total package is $100,005, according to the manager of
financial planning for Milwaukee public schools. How can that be?

 

This is how.

 

.Social Security and Medicare. The employer cost is 7.65% of wages, the same
as in the private sector.

 

.State Pension. Teachers belong to the Wisconsin state pension plan. That
plan requires a 6.8% employer contribution and 6.2% from the employee.
However, according to the collective-bargaining agreement in place since
1996, the district pays the employees' share as well, for a total of 13%.

 

.Teachers' Supplemental Pension. In addition to the state pension, Milwaukee
public-school teachers receive an additional pension under a 1982
collective-bargaining agreement. The district contributes an additional 4.2%
of teacher salaries to cover this second pension. Teachers contribute
nothing.

 

.Classified Pension. Most other school employees belong to the city's
pension system instead of the state plan. The city plan is less expensive
but here, too, according to the collective-bargaining agreement, the
district pays the employees' 5.5% share.

 

Overall, for teachers and other employees, the district's contributions for
pensions and Social Security total 22.6 cents for each dollar of salary. The
corresponding figure for private industry is 13.4 cents. The divergence is
greater yet for health insurance:

 

.Health care for current employees. Under the current collective- bargaining
agreements, the school district pays the entire premium for medical and
vision benefits, and over half the cost of dental coverage. These plans are
extremely expensive.

 

This is partly because of Wisconsin's unique arrangement under which the
teachers union is the sponsor of the group health-insurance plans. Not
surprisingly, benefits are generous. The district's contributions for health
insurance of active employees total 38.8% of wages. For private-sector
workers nationwide, the average is 10.7%.

 

These excellent benefits are paid for by citizens who in many cases have
little or no pensions and no health benefits.

 

The unions appeal to other workers on the grounds that this is an attack on
labor. It isn't. It's an attempt to bring some commonsense to the process.
The high benefits in Wisconsin don't help labor generally, they are just an
additional expense to be recovered in sales taxes and suchlike paid by all
labor,

 

As I said, they have simply gone too far. A good wage has been replaced by
the gravy train.

 

Harry

 

******************************

Henry George School of Los Angeles

Box 655  Tujunga  CA 91042

(818) 352-4141

******************************

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 3:42 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: [Futurework] The growing US war against public sector unions:

 

 

 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/22/AR201102220
5139.html?wpisrc=nl_headline>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/22/AR2011022205
139.html?wpisrc=nl_headline

 

 

Ed

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to