http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13011073
8 April 2011 Last updated at 08:00 ET
New York set to be big loser as sea levels rise
By Richard Black Environment correspondent, BBC News, Vienna
Places like New York are projected to experience an above average
sea level increase
New York is a major loser and Reykjavik a winner from new forecasts of
sea level rise in different regions.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said in 2007 that
sea levels would rise at least 28cm (1ft) by the year 2100.
But this is a global average; and now a Dutch team has made what
appears to be the first attempt to model all the factors leading to
regional variations.
Other researchers say the IPCC's figure is likely to be a huge under-
estimate.
Whatever the global figure turns out to be, there will be regional
differences.
Ocean currents and differences in the temperature and salinity of
seawater are among the factors that mean sea level currently varies by
up a metre across the oceans - this does not include short-term
changes due to tides or winds.
So if currents change with global warming, which is expected - and if
regions such as the Arctic Ocean become less saline as ice sheets
discharge their contents into the sea - the regional patterns of peaks
and troughs will also change.
"Everybody will still have the impact, and in many places they will
get the average rise," said Roderik van der Wal from the University of
Utrecht, one of the team presenting their regional projections at the
European Geosciences Union (EGU) meeting in Vienna.
"But places like New York are going to have a larger contribution than
the average - 20% more in this case - and Reykjavik will be better off."
Of the 13 regions where the team makes specific projections, New York
sees the biggest increase from the global average, although Vancouver,
Tasmania and The Maldives are also forecast to see above-average
impacts.
Gravity trap
One peculiarity of the projections is that areas closer to melting ice
sheets will experience a smaller sea level rise than those further away.
Continue reading the main story
Sea level rise is not set to be consistent around the globe
Battling against the rising tide
This is because ice sheets such as those on Greenland or Antarctica
gravitationally attract the water.
This pulls the water towards the coast, effectively making it pile up
to an extent that can be measured in centimetres.
If the ice begins to melt, it raises the average sea level simply by
entering the sea; but the gravitational pull is now smaller, so
locally the sea level may go down.
"So if the Greenland sheet melts more, that's better for New York; but
if Antarctica melts, that's worse for New York - and it's equally true
for northwestern Europe," Professor van der Wal told BBC News.
The effects are particularly pronounced for Reykjavik, the closest
capital to Greenland, which is projected to receive less than half the
global average sea level rise.
Ice sheet question
Roderik van der Wal is one of scientists working on the sea level
projections that will be included in the next IPCC assessment, due out
in 2013-4.
Before then, other scientists are likely to have completed more
regional models that can be put into this mix
"We're right at the beginning of making regional projections, and at
this point there is still a lot of uncertainty," commented Stefan
Rahmstorf, a sea level specialist from the Potsdam Institute for
Climate Impact Research in Germany.
"But it is clear that some parts of the world will feel sea level rise
much more quickly than other parts; and an additional factor is land
movements.
"In some places such as a lot of the Scandinavian coastline, the land
is rising so fast that they will not have any problem with sea level
rise in the near future, whereas in other places the land is subsiding
- that includes some of the world's big delta cities."
Just before the last IPCC report came out in 2007, Professor Rahmstorf
published research showing that sea levels had been rising faster that
climate models predicted.
Since then, he and others, using various techniques, have concluded
that somewhere between half a metre and two metres is likely by the
end of the century.
He came to the EGU with a further analysis putting the likely range at
0.75-1.9m - the range reflecting uncertainties in how ice sheets may
melt, and in how society may or may not respond to the findings of
climate scientists by controlling greenhouse gas emissions.
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
