What makes you think that the government isn't subsidizing oil and natural gas? Perhaps those out of the US aren't aware that we don't get Murdoch's website for a hyperlink. You have to pay. So I would suggest not discussing anything that can't be cut and pasted or is free. I don't have the money to buy every news source out there. I wait for my cousin Karen to put it on the Casey Reports or I don't read it. Also I buy books. I don't have a government pension and still work free lance in the private sector. Now that IS an inconvenient truth about the Information Age and how it works.
REH From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 10:01 AM To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION; Arthur Cordell Subject: Re: [Futurework] FW: Inconvenient Truths About 'Renewable' Energy - The Wall Street Journal. At 13:56 21/05/2011, Arthur wrote: Subject: Inconvenient Truths About 'Renewable' Energy - The Wall Street Journal. I thought you would be interested in the following story from The Wall Street Journal. Inconvenient Truths About 'Renewable' Energy http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703421204576327410322365714.ht ml Yes, this is a pretty accurate summary of the 'renewables. What the article should also have said that the techno-renewables -- wind, solar, nuclear power -- are uneconomic and all require government subsidies. And this, long before their long-term maintenance costs (and de-commissioning costs in the case of nuclear) are known. Keith _______________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2011/05/
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
