-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Sid Shniad
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 11:45 AM
Subject: We've been warned: the system is ready to blow -- Economics editor,
The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/aug/14/larry-elliott-global-financia
l-system

The
Guardian
14 August 2011

*We've been warned: the system is ready to blow

Only a new way of managing the global economy can prevent more mayhem in the
markets and on the streets

Larry Elliott
Economics editor, The Guardian
*
For the past two centuries and more, life in Britain has been governed by a
simple concept: tomorrow will be better than today. Black August has given
us a glimpse of a dystopia, one in which the financial markets buckle and
the cities burn. Like Scrooge, we have been shown what might be to come
unless we change our ways.

There were glimmers of hope amid last week's despair. Neighbourhoods rallied
round in the face of the looting. The Muslim community in Birmingham showed
incredible dignity after three young men were mown down by a car and killed
during the riots. It was chastening to see consumerism laid bare. We have
seen the future and we know it sucks. All of which is cause for cautious
optimism – provided the right lessons are drawn.

Lesson number one is that the financial and social causes are linked. Lesson
number two is that what links the City banker and the looter is the lack of
restraint, the absence of boundaries to bad behaviour. Lesson number three
is that we ignore this at our peril.

To understand the mess we are in, it's important to know how we got here.
Today marks the 40th anniversary of Richard Nixon's announcement that
America was suspending the convertibility of the dollar into gold at $35 an
ounce. Speculative attacks on the dollar had begun in the late 1960s as
concerns mounted over America's rising trade deficit and the cost of the
Vietnam war. Other countries were increasingly reluctant to take dollars in
payment and demanded gold instead. Nixon called time on the Bretton Woods
system of fixed but adjustable exchange rates, under which countries could
use capital controls in order to stimulate their economies without fear of a
run on their currency. It was also an era in which protectionist measures
were used quite liberally: Nixon announced on 15 August 1971 that he was
imposing a 10% tax on all imports into the US.

Four decades on, it is hard not to feel nostalgia for the Bretton Woods
system. Imperfect though it was, it acted as an anchor for the global
economy for more than a quarter of a century, and allowed individual
countries to pursue full employment policies. It was a period devoid of
systemic financial crises.

Utter mess

There have been big structural changes in the way the global economy has
been managed since 1971, none of them especially beneficial. The fixed
exchange rate system has been replaced by a hybrid system in which some
currencies are pegged and others float. The currencies in the eurozone, for
example, are fixed against each other, but the euro floats against the
dollar, the pound and the Swiss franc. The Hong Kong dollar is tied to the
US dollar, while Beijing has operated a system under which the yuan is
allowed to appreciate against the greenback but at a rate much slower than
economic fundamentals would suggest.

The system is an utter mess, particularly since almost every country in the
world is now seeking to manipulate its currency downwards in order to make
exports cheaper and imports dearer. This is clearly not possible. Sir Mervyn
King noted last week that the solution to the crisis involved China and
Germany reflating their economies so that debtor nations like the US and
Britain could export more. Progress on that front has been painfully slow,
and will remain so while the global currency system remains so
dysfunctional. The solution is either a fully floating system under which
countries stop manipulating their currencies or an attempt to recreate a new
fixed exchange rate system using a basket of world currencies as its
anchor..

The break-up of the Bretton Woods system paved the way for the
liberalisation of financial markets. This began in the 1970s and picked up
speed in the 1980s. Exchange controls were lifted and formal restrictions on
credit abandoned. Policymakers were left with only one blunt instrument to
control the availability of credit: interest rates.

For a while in the late 1980s, the easy availability of money provided the
illusion of wealth but there was a shift from a debt-averse world where
financial crises were virtually unknown to a debt-sodden world constantly
teetering on the brink of banking armageddon.

Currency markets lost their anchor in 1971 when the US suspended dollar
convertibility. Over the years, financial markets have lost their moral
anchor, engaging not just in reckless but fraudulent behaviour. According to
the US economist James Galbraith, increased complexity was the cover for
blatant and widespread wrongdoing.

Looking back at the sub-prime mortgage scandal, in which millions of
Americans were mis-sold home loans, Galbraith says there has been a complete
breakdown in trust that is impairing the hopes of economic recovery.

"There was a private vocabulary, well-known in the industry, covering these
loans and related financial products: liars' loans, Ninja loans (the
borrowers had no income, no job or assets), neutron loans (loans that would
explode, destroying the people but leaving the buildings intact), toxic
waste (the residue of the securitisation process). I suggest that this tells
you that those who sold these products knew or suspected that their line of
work was not 100% honest. Think of the restaurant where the staff refers to
the food as scum, sludge and sewage."

Finally, there has been a big change in the way that the spoils of economic
success have been divvied up. Back when Nixon was berating the speculators
attacking the dollar peg, there was an implicit social contract under which
the individual was guaranteed a job and a decent wage that rose as the
economy grew. The fruits of growth were shared with employers, and taxes
were recycled into schools, health care and pensions. In return, individuals
obeyed the law and encouraged their children to do the same. The assumption
was that each generation would have a better life than the last.

This implicit social contract has broken down. Growth is less rapid than it
was 40 years ago, and the gains have disproportionately gone to companies
and the very rich. In the UK, the professional middle classes, particularly
in the southeast, are doing fine, but below them in the income scale are
people who have become more dependent on debt as their real incomes have
stagnated. Next are the people on minimum wage jobs, which have to be topped
up by tax credits so they can make ends meet. At the very bottom of the pile
are those who are without work, many of them second and third generation
unemployed.

Deep trouble

A crisis that has been four decades in the making will not be solved
overnight. It will be difficult to recast the global monetary system to
ensure that the next few years see gradual recovery rather than depression.
Wall Street and the City will resist all attempts at clipping their wings.
There is strong ideological resistance to the policies that make decent
wages in a full employment economy feasible: capital controls, allowing
strong trade unions, wage subsidies, and protectionism.

But this is a fork in the road. History suggests there is no iron law of
progress and there have been periods when things have got worse not better.
Together, the global imbalances, the manic-depressive behaviour of stock
markets, the venality of the financial sector, the growing gulf between rich
and poor, the high levels of unemployment, the naked consumerism and the
riots are telling us something.

This is a system in deep trouble and it is waiting to blow.

[email protected]


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to