Thanks for the quote from the Post.    My point is that Americans don't have
much right to point fingers.    As Harry has pointed out with his love for
nuclear power, the problems of Japan are here except we have so much more
space, resources and a smaller population that we sometimes think we can get
away with losing a few hundred square miles of territory for the benefit of
the non carbon energy.   Generally I am more impressed with Japanese culture
and the ability to handle large systems than I am with America on the same
turf. 

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of D and N
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 1:13 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] What really Happened at Fukushima

 

I got the Miracle bit 'cause Sam Smith posted the WaPost article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-sad-facts-behind-rick-perrys-texa
s-miracle/2011/08/16/gIQAxc3zJJ_story.html
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-sad-facts-behind-rick-perrys-tex
as-miracle/2011/08/16/gIQAxc3zJJ_story.html> 

highlights: Harold Meyerson, Washington Post - Consider the Texas that Perry
holds up to the rest of the nation for admiration. It has the fourth-highest
poverty rate of any state. It tied with Mississippi last year for the
highest percentage of workers in minimum-wage jobs. It ranks first in adults
without high school diplomas. Twenty-six percent of Texans have no health
insurance - the highest percentage of medically uninsured residents of any
state. It leads the nation in the percentage of children who lack medical
insurance. Texas has an inordinate number of employers who provide no
insurance to their workers, partly because insurance rates are high, thanks
to an absence of regulations.

Perry seems quite comfortable with the state's lagging performance in what
we might term the pursuit-of-happiness index. Consider his indifference
toward education: In 2008, the state comptroller found that 12 percent of
Texans lacked high school diplomas and that the level would rise to 30
percent by 2040 unless the state's commitment to education was considerably
increased. This year, though, when confronted with a $27 billion budget
deficit, Perry did not raise taxes but instead slashed $4 billion from K-12
schools.

And I presumed that child poverty would almost rival the US because of
somewhat similar economies and educational systems. I could make the leap
about at-risk environment being the lot of the poor.

But what I sent in had to do with criminal nuclear energy maintenance
negligence and mismanagement and convenient earthquake/tsunami cover-up,
casting further doubts on nuclear energy safety anywhere. So to my mind, the
connection is vague, and I'm curious if more was meant. 

Meltdowns and near meltdowns occur in wealthier countries too, with varying
degrees of secrecy. All people worry about keeping their jobs. 

Ray, what were you saying?
Natalia

On 8/28/2011 2:25 PM, Robert Stennett wrote: 

I cannot speak for Ray's thinking, but I can state that the poor tend to be
under-nourished (not always malnourished, but that problem affects some, as
well), and thus less resilient to environmental teratogens, toxins, or other
shocks to the system. In addition, in the US (and presumably in Japan and
other countries), the poorest individuals live in the most undesirable
neighborhoods - closest to landfills, powerplants (nuclear and
conventional), industrial areas. This ensures a greater exposure to
environmental toxins, and thus, a greater 'load' to overcome.   

 

You and Ray may want to look at
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/ed20100125a2.html.  I've pasted the
article below.

 

Ray's reference to the "Texas miracle" is a reference to a current US
politician with presidential aspirations. The governor of Texas has claimed
that his policies have helped protect Texas from the current recession, but
this doesn't seem to be true....
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/15/opinion/the-texas-unmiracle.html for more
details on this. Ray's link showed the child poverty rate in a number of
areas of the US. In Texas, it ranges from 25% to 37%, depending on the area
of the state, and is 11.7% in Canada (18.8% in B.C., according to data from
Statistics Canada)

 

Barry

 

 

 

 

 

On Aug 28, 2011, at 4:13 PM, D and N wrote:





Could you please make the connection that you have in mind? 
Natalia

On 8/27/2011 2:41 PM, Ray Harrell wrote: 

I wonder what the child poverty rate was in Japan?    Check out the Texas
miracle.

 

REH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, Jan. 25, 2010

 <http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/ed-a-all.html> 



Poverty in Japan


Japan's relative poverty rate as of 2007 stood at 15.7 percent, the Health,
Labor and Welfare Ministry announced last October. This marks the first time
the government has officially released its own data on the subject. Past
rates were known only through surveys conducted by the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development. The public announcement of this data
is a welcome end to the willful denial of previous administrations, but one
demanding a response and action.

 

        

 

The 2007 relative poverty rate, up from 14.9 percent in the 2004 OECD
survey, is the fourth-highest among OECD's 30 member nations. With half the
median income for all income earners in the nation serving as the dividing
line, the relative poverty rate is likely to have worsened in the past few
years, but we will never know until more recent data is forthcoming. For
now, though, the reality is that 19 million Japanese are living below the
poverty line, or nearly one in every six citizens.

Japan may imagine itself as middle class and, compared with other OECD
countries, the distribution of income before redistribution has remained
better than many, but Japanese society is increasingly becoming pear-shaped.
The elderly, older workers, recent unemployed graduates and especially
single mothers and their children make up an ever-larger portion of those in
poverty. According to the OECD survey, some 59 percent of those below the
poverty line are single parents. This figure was one of the worst of all
OECD countries in 2004.

Now that the administration has announced its base figure for the first
time, it will have a clear, public benchmark. Once ministries start
announcing statistics, academic researchers, independent organizations and
the press can check these figures. That will help to hold the current and
future administrations accountable. Admitting the problem is the first, big
step, but finding solutions is the more important second step.

As welcome as this announcement was, facts are sometimes not as visible as
the human beings in poverty. Last year's "temporary workers village" in
Hibiya Park over the new year holidays caused the administration to scurry
around this year to find shelter and extend unemployment benefits to over
230,000 people.

The hard work of creating a fair and just economic system will demand a
substantial readjustment of Japan's past socioeconomic norms and practices.
Now that the government has admitted there is poverty, action must follow.

 






_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to