What I always find amazing with stuff like this is that I'm here and alive.  
Our now human ancestry goes back a few billion years through a variety of 
mutations.  But in the case of we who are alive today, aren't we lucky that 
none of our ancestors died before they procreated.  That is how come we are 
here.

Ed




________________________________
From: D and N <[email protected]>
To: "RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2011 7:18:26 PM
Subject: [Futurework] missing link? skeletons, 2 mil. years old


Just heard about this on CBC radio:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/08/tech/main6374925.shtml

Natalia

2 Million-Year-Old Skeletons Reveal Man-Ape Link
By CBSNews 
AP)  Two skeletons nearly 2 million years old and unearthed in South Africa are 
part of a previously unknown species that scientists say fits the transition 
from ancient apes to modern humans.

The fossils bear traits from both lineages, and researchers have
    named them Australopithecus sediba, meaning "southern ape,
    wellspring," to indicate their relation to earlier apelike forms and
    to features later found in more modern people.

"These fossils give us an extraordinarily detailed look into a new
    chapter of human evolution and provide a window into a critical
    period when hominids made the committed change from dependency on
    life in the trees to life on the ground," said Lee R. Berger of
    South Africa's University of Witwatersrand. "Australopithecus sediba
    appears to present a mosaic of features demonstrating an animal
    comfortable in both worlds."

On Sunday's "60 Minutes," correspondent Bob Simon will report on the discovery, 
including an interview with Berger. 

Berger and colleagues describe the find in Friday's issue of the
    journal Science.

Modern humans, known as Homo sapiens, descended over millions of
    years from earlier groups, such as Australopithecus, the best-known
    example of which may be the fossil Lucy, who lived about a million
    years before the newly discovered A. sediba.

Berger said the newly described fossils date between 1.95 million
    and 1.78 million years ago.

Some have characterized the find as a "missing link," but that is a
    concept no longer accepted by science.

"The 'missing link' made sense when we could take the earliest
    fossils and the latest ones and line them up in a row. It was easy
    back then," explained Smithsonian Institution paleontologist Richard
    Potts. But now researchers know there was great diversity of
    branches in the human family tree rather than a single smooth line.

Recent stories on evolutionary finds:

DNA May Point to New Human Ancestor 
Smithsonian Opens Human Evolution Hall 
"Hobbit" Skeleton Challenges Evolution 

The two new fossils were found in a pit in what was once a cave,
    their bones preserved by hardened sediment that buried them in a
    flood shortly after they died, the researchers said.

One was a female estimated to have been in her late 20s or early 30s
    and the other was a male age 8 or 9, according to the report. Two
    more have been found since this discovery, but Berger declined to
    detail them.

Berger said their features suggest that the transition from earlier
    groups to the Homo genus occurred in very slow stages.

"We can conclude that this new species shares more derived features
    with early Homo than any other known australopith species, and thus
    represents a candidate ancestor for the genus, or a sister group to
    a close ancestor that persisted for some time after the first
    appearance of Homo," he said.

But, Berger said, it isn't yet Homo because it "doesn't have the
    whole package."

A. sediba could turn out to be a sort of Rosetta stone that helps
    unlock the secrets of the development of the genus Homo, Berger
    said, even if it turns out to be a side branch.

According to the researchers, A. sediba had an advanced hip bone and
    long legs, allowing it to stride like humans, but also had long arms
    and powerful hands like an ape. Both the female and the juvenile
    were about 4 feet 2 inches. The female would have weighed about 73
    pounds and the child about 60 pounds.

"The brain size of the juvenile was between about 26.5 to 27.5 cubic
    inches, which is small, but the shape of the brain seems to be more
    advanced than that of Australopithecines," the researchers reported.
    Our human brains are about 73 to 98 cubic inches.

While the skeletons had traits of both genuses, the researchers said
    they chose to classify them conservatively as Australopithecus,
    rather than Homo, because of their upper body design and brain size.

Potts, director of the Human Origins Project at the Smithsonian's
    National Museum of Natural History, noted that other examples with
    some Australopithecine and some Homo traits existed as much as a
    half-million years before A. sediba. This particular combination has
    not been seen before, he said.

"It's part of the experimentation of evolution," said Potts, who was
    not part of Berger's research team. Also, he cautioned, because
    there are only two examples there is no way to know if the gene pool
    died out or was passed along to others.

Funding for the research was provided by the South African
    Department of Science and Technology, the South African National
    Research Foundation, the Institute for Human Evolution, the
    Palaeontological Scientific Trust, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation,
    the AfricaArray Program, the U.S. Diplomatic Mission to South Africa
    and Sir Richard Branson, the billionaire founder of Virgin Group
    Ltd. 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to