So it looks like the future for "burger flippers" might also be bleak.  

 

========================================================

 

For fast-food help, call in the robots

 

by Michael Kanellos Staff Writer, CNET News 

 

Some robots are destined to rove the surface of Mars. Others, like
Hyperactive Bob, will work in fast-food restaurants.

 

Pittsburgh's Hyperactive Technologies1 has come up with a system, based on
the computer vision and artificial intelligence systems employed by robots,
to manage the kitchens at so-called quick-service restaurants.

 

The vision system in Hyperactive Bob essentially scans the parking lot for
incoming cars. It then cross-references traffic patterns against data about
the restaurant--the bell curve of orders, the time of day, cooking times,
the current amount of food in the restaurant's warming bins--and issues
cooking orders to the employees manning the grill or the deep fat fryer.
There isn't a mechanical humanoid assembling chicken sandwiches behind the
counter. Instead, Hyperactive Bob combines machine intelligence with human
activity.

 

By more tightly correlating the cooking line with incoming traffic, food
gets cooked when it's needed, which makes customer satisfaction go up,
according to Hyperactive CEO Joe Porfeli.

 

"You've probably had a meal in a quick-service restaurant once in your life.
Your opinion of that chain is based on the last store you ate in," he said.

Hyperactive Bob

 

So far, the company's systems have been installed in approximately 115
Zaxby's restaurants, a chain in the Southeastern United States, and pilot
systems have been installed in Popeye's Chicken and Jack in the Box outlets.
Carl's Jr. will kick off a pilot program soon.

 

Overall, there are 125,000 restaurants in the U.S. that could adopt the
system, according to Porfeli. Hyperactive recently signed up with an
Australian distributor as well.

 

Employees interact with Bob through touch screens in a two-stage process.
They touch the screen to indicate they will accept a task, and then touch it
again after the task has been completed.

 

"The interactive touch screens are $700 a piece. It has to be able to
withstand high heat and grease," Porfeli said.

 

The hardware, which consists of a Windows PC and in-kitchen touch screens,
sells for $5,000, about what the hardware costs. The company primarily makes
its money from software licenses. Restaurants pay $3,000 a year for a
license, Porfeli said.

 

The Zaxby's chain says it has saved an average of $8,000 in reduced food
waste per year. And it sees other benefits as well.

 

"Your food is fresher because you are cooking small amounts more often,"
said Brandi Clanton, who owns two Zaxby's outlets and installed the robot in
both. "Before Bob, they were basically cooking by guesstimate."

 

Porfeli says that some stores have also seen indirect benefits in higher
sales and lower employee turnover.

 

"The turnover is relatively high because people don't like getting yelled
at. When Bob goes in, the yelling goes away," he said. "It costs somewhere
between $12,000 to $14,000 a year to train a new employee."

 

Inspired by a drive-through mishap

 

The company got its start thanks to a bad day in the drive-through lane. One
of the founders went to a restaurant to pick up some food. When he got to
the window, he was told to pull over and wait until his order was completed.
That's exactly the kind of experience Hyperactive, which in March announced
it had raised $8.4 million in a second round of funding, hopes it can help
prevent.

 

But there are challenges in making Hyperactive Bob effective. For one,
Hyperactive needs to simplify the interface for an employee base whose job
and computer skills can be widely varied. And each store's needs and order
patterns differ. A burger joint located near a school might see a spurt of
activity in the afternoon, while one near a retirement community might have
a rush on chicken sandwiches in the early part of the evening.

 

Why not simply use infrared technology to determine when cars come into the
lot instead of computer vision systems, which tend to be fairly complex? For
one thing, it doesn't work well in inclement weather, Porfeli said.
Conventional infrared technology systems also have difficulty distinguishing
between incoming and outgoing traffic.

 

One parameter that the company doesn't care about is the kind of car you
drive. It doesn't matter, it turns out.

 

"We have the capability to identify types of cars by size and color and
whatnot, but we have found it's not statistically relevant," he said. "A
Corvette can pick up seven orders for the construction site down the street,
and a minivan can have one person in it for a cup of coffee."

 

Unglamorous jobs such as running a kitchen in a fast-food outlet represent
the future of robotics2, according to many. Sony, Honda3 and other companies
have tried to market companion pet robots and humanoids, but most of them
have not sold well. Instead, consumers and businesses alike are buying more
utilitarian devices such as the Roomba and Scooba from iRobot4 for cleaning
floors.

 

The Department of Defense has also become a major customer for robots,
investing in machines that can comb caves or perform battlefield tasks5.

 

Pittsburgh is one of the national centers for robotics because of the
robotics program at Carnegie Mellon University6, which has one of the more
extensive programs on the subject. Both Hyperactive founders are former CMU
researchers.

References

 

   1. ^Hyperactive Technologies (www.hyperactivetechnologies.com) (
http://www.hyperactivetechnologies.com )

   2. ^future of robotics (news.cnet.com) (
http://news.cnet.com/Invasion-of-the-robots/2009-1040_3-5171948.html )

   3. ^Honda (news.cnet.com) (
http://news.cnet.com/Photos-Run%2C-Asimo%2C-run/2009-1041_3-5491667.html )

   4. ^Roomba and Scooba from iRobot (news.cnet.com) (
http://news.cnet.com/My-life-with-Scooba/2100-11394_3-6130694.html )

   5. ^perform battlefield tasks (news.cnet.com) (
http://news.cnet.com/Gun-toting-robot-still-in-training/2100-1008_3-5757611.
html )

   6. ^Carnegie Mellon University (news.cnet.com) (
http://news.cnet.com/Digital-desert-Qatar-leads-Arab-world-in-tech-education
/2009-1014_3-6027650.html )

 

Share

 

    *

 

Original URL:

 

http://news.cnet.com/For-fast-food-help,-call-in-the-robots/2100-11394_3-617
0097.html

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 1:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] I didn't know about this.....

 

 

...and I'm not sure that I know about it now. Whaddya think?

 

 

    http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm

 

    The "robot" installed at this first Burger-G restaurant looked

    nothing like the robots of popular culture. It was not hominid

    like C-3PO or futuristic like R2-D2 or industrial like an assembly

    line robot. Instead it was simply a PC sitting in the back corner

    of the restaurant running a piece of software.  The software was

    called "Manna", version 1.0*.

 

    [snip]

 

    Manna told employees what to do simply by talking to them.

   Employees each put on a headset when they punched in.  Manna had a

    voice synthesizer, and with its synthesized voice Manna told

    everyone exactly what to do through their

    headsets. Constantly. Manna micro-managed minimum wage employees

    to create perfect performance.

 

    The software would speak to the employees individually and tell

    each one exactly what to do. For example, "Bob, we need to load

    more patties. Please walk toward the freezer."

 

    Or, "Jane, when you are through with this customer, please close

    your register. Then we will clean the women's restroom."

 

    [snip]

 

    So, the first real wave of robots did not replace all the factory

    workers as everyone imagined. The robots replaced middle

    management and significantly improved the performance of minimum

    wage employees. All of the fast food chains watched the Burger-G

    experiment with Manna closely, and by 2012 they started installing

    Manna systems as well. By 2014 or so, nearly every business in

    America that had a significant pool of minimum-wage employees was

    installing Manna software or something similar. They had to do it

    in order to compete.

 

 

Cool, huh?

 

(It's a much longer piece, several chapters.)

 

-- 

Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 

                                                           /V\ 

[email protected]                                     /( )\

http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/                        ^^-^^

_______________________________________________

Futurework mailing list

[email protected]

https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to