Ray,

At 13:49 29/03/2012, you wrote:
(REH) I agree with your second statement. The kiss up to whomever is elected at the moment. Did the European governments default after WWII? Would they have been able to succeed over the past seventy years had they been required to pay for the kinds of military they supported prior to the World Wars? What would Europe look like today if America had not paid the bill to defend them during the Cold War?

(KH) Never mind the Cold War. Never mind Marshall Aid. What about WWII itself? If the Japanese hadn't bombed Pearl Harbour then public opinion in America would have remained strongly against helping the UK to try and regain the rest of Western Europe from the Germans. Without this support, Roosevelt couldn't lift a finger to help until Pearl Harbour came along. The UK would certainly have been invaded, too, together with a few of our colonies. Once Germany had got access to the Baltic oilfields then Russia would also have been finished soon afterwards. With the science, technology and work ethic of the Germans, America would have faced a Europe that was a much more formidable foe than communist Russia.

Keith

Even today we pay more to support World governing than all of the rest of the world combined. If we paid the same amount for our military as you do we wouldn't be bankrupt at all.

REH

From: Keith Hudson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:08 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION; Ray Harrell
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Could it be that the Democrats are better at and for business?

At 06:55 29/03/2012, Ray wrote:


Could it be that business will go the way of the Classical Arts in the hands of the Republicans. A 98% decline?

No. Business will remain healthily in the hands of the 20-class, as will the Classical Arts. As to Republicans, I don't think the 20-class attach a great deal of importance to them, or the Democrats. Whether both parties, or the present form of Western government, will actually survive on the other side of the present national bankruptcies is a moot point.

Keith





REH

March 28, 2012  NYTimes


Business Bets on the G.O.P. May Be Backfiring







By <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/w/jonathan_weisman/index.html?inline=nyt-per>JONATHAN WEISMAN





WASHINGTON ­ Big business groups like the Chamber of Commerce spent millions of dollars in 2010 to elect Republican candidates running for the House. The return on investment has not always met expectations.

Even though money for major road and bridge projects is set to run out this weekend, House Republican leaders have struggled all week to round up the votes from recalcitrant conservatives simply to extend it for 90 or even 60 days. A longer-term <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/t/transportation/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>transportation bill that contractors and the chamber say is vital to the recovery of the construction industry appears hopelessly stalled over costs.

At the same time, House conservatives are pressing to allow the <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/export-import-bank-of-the-us/index.html?inline=nyt-org>U.S. Export-Import Bank, which has financed exports since the Depression, to run out of lending authority within weeks. The bank faces the possibility of shutting its doors completely by the end of May, when its legal authorization expires.

And a host of routine business tax breaks ­ from <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/w/wind_power/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>wind energy subsidies to research and development tax credits ­ cannot be passed because of Republican insistence that they be paid for with spending cuts.

Business groups that worked hard to install a Republican majority in the House equated Republican control with a business-friendly environment. But the majority is first and foremost a conservative political force, and on key issues, its ideology is not always aligned with commercial interests that helped finance election victories.

“Free market is not always the same as pro-business,” said Barney Keller, spokesman for the conservative political action committee Club for Growth.

There could be real-world consequences to the conservative rebellion. The 90-day extension of the highway trust fund that House Republican leaders say they will pass this week in lieu of a broad highway bill would keep existing projects moving for now. But business groups say few new government-funded infrastructure projects can get under way without longer-range certainty about federal backing.

“The majority of the work is supposed to go out in spring and get done by the fall,” said Jeff Shoaf, senior executive director of government affairs at the Associated General Contractors, a group that donated $1 million to candidates in 2010, 80 percent of that to Republicans. “Instead of spending 60 or 70 percent of their budgets, they’re going to cut back to 50 or 40 percent to make sure they have some cash in the fall.”

Exports have been one of the bright spots of the fragile recovery, but without Export-Import Bank financing, companies could struggle to complete contracts with overseas buyers. Those buyers will most likely turn to foreign competitors whose governments have more robust versions of the bank, businesspeople say.

“There’s not a bank in the United States that’s going to loan money to that customer of mine in Argentina to buy my airplane,” said David Ickert, vice president of finance at Air Tractor, which makes crop-dusting and firefighting airplanes in Olney, Tex. “There is not a free-market system that operates like that. It does not exist. We need the Ex-Im Bank, period.”

Like so much else in Congress these days, it is not that simple.

With its charter set to expire in May, the bank is the target of conservative groups. They are making the case to Republicans that the bank, created in 1934 to finance sales to the Soviet Union, has no place in a free-market system. Club for Growth is holding it up as the next Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, crowding out private lending and offering dangerous loans that ultimately could be left in the laps of the taxpayer.

“Those groups are just wrong, period,” said Jay Timmons, president of the National Association of Manufacturers and a generous personal contributor to Republican candidates.

The bank is financed with a small percentage of each loan it makes to foreign buyers of American exports, producing $3.4 billion in profits for the federal government over the last five years.

Drew Greenblatt, president and owner of Marlin Steel Wire Products, in Baltimore, said he recently got a rush order for wire baskets from a firm in Singapore, assuming he could finance the sale. He went to the Export-Import Bank and paid a one-half-percent fee on the loan. The bank guaranteed 95 percent of the loan. He kept the plant working through the weekend and completed the sale.

“Think about all the winners in this transaction,” he said. “Ex-Im got half a point. Baltimore City steelworkers got extra hours. I got extra profits to meet payroll, and hopefully I got a client who will reorder from me.”

If anything, the anger over the stalled transportation bill is even more acute, business lobbyists say. The Senate, in a bipartisan vote, has passed a surface transportation bill that would keep money flowing for two years. The House, however, appears stuck.

Republican leaders first tried a five-year bill that would be financed in part by opening land to <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/oil-petroleum-and-gasoline/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>oil drilling. But division over the drilling provisions and its scant funding for mass transit brought opposition from moderate Republicans, while conservatives objected to the amount of federal largess in the bill. Business lobbyists, contractors and local government officials from both parties have pressed the House to move forward, so far to no avail.

John Engler, president of the Business Roundtable, which represents the chief executives of major American corporations, said in an era of scarcity, anything that cost money was receiving a high level of scrutiny. And the highway bill is more contentious than those in the past. Previous bills have been financed mainly by the federal <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/g/gasoline_tax_us/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>gasoline tax, but rising <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/f/fuel_efficiency/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>fuel efficiency is depleting gas tax receipts as infrastructure needs increase.

Difficulty is no excuse, said Mr. Engler, a former Republican governor of Michigan. “We’re letting people say it’s hard and so we won’t go forward,” he said. “That is what the business community cannot understand.”

To conservative groups, fresh eyes on issues have produced fresh, small-government thinking. The Export-Import Bank, for instance, wanted a new, long-term authorization with an expanded loan limit and broader authority. Instead, Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia is drafting a 13-month reauthorization that would demand the Obama administration begin international talks to phase out export-lending subsidies globally, force the bank to be more transparent in its lending practices and rein in its loan portfolio.

Some Republicans are growing worried about the ramifications of these fights. Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, has pressed to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank, but at the insistence of Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, he joined his party in opposing Democratic efforts to add reauthorization to a small-business finance bill. Now Mr. Graham says his party has to find a way to move a stand-alone bill, and fast.

“Come June, if this program dies, it will be the end of job creation for thousands of businesses for no good reason,” he said. “And it’ll happen on our watch, with our fingerprints on it.”

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Keith Hudson, Saltford, England <http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/>http://allisstatus.wordpress.com


Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com
   
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to