I'm unsure why this was sent or why it was written in the first place.
Was it written to show how the drastic insanities of a mob can destroy a family? Thus ensuring a public that will condone armed police and soldiers to restrain desperate citizens?
Was it written to show the complacency of those in charge of the banking when it comes to proper safety precautions for their employees? Thus ensuring more controls around the money centres.
Was it written to inflame those on both sides of the issue of the 1% vs the 99%? Thus ensuring further confrontations.
Was it written to merely sell newspapers? Thus ensuring some kind of emotional up-welling for the surrounding advertising.
Or was it written to inform the country (and the world) that even more of the same will occur if the bankers are allowed to continue in their greed and arrogance with no checks and balances by government?
Do I appear cruel and unempathetic in my response to this article? Thus ensuring greater antipathy from the list.
Well, in the smothering greed of this world someone has to question the reasons behind the stories. It might as well be me.
D. On 03/05/2012 10:42 AM, michael gurstein wrote:
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/02/world/europe/greece-papathanasopoulou-fami ly/index.html?hpt=hp_c3
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
