To the Futurework list.   You should know of the passing of the great Artist
Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau.    Many years ago after a concert I had the
opportunity to meet him in a receiving line.    There was only one thing to
say.    "Thank you."    He smiled and said,  "you're welcome."    Everyone
of us in the theater felt that he was singing and telling the stories
personally to us.     

 

There are some people that I want to get to know personally for conversation
and good fellowship.   There are some that are like family that I feel that
their person is the reason for knowing them.    Then there are the people in
my profession who I learned early on, that the appropriateness of space was
the best way for me not to ruin my experience of their great art.    I
deliberately did not cultivate those people, as acquaintances,  but let
their art speak solely to me as a reservoir of cultural depth, wisdom and
beauty.   They speak for their country, their culture, their family and
their heritage.    I worked with them on the stage but knowing them was
often not "artistic" for me personally.     I needed to know them though
their art as  "keepers" of great traditions, heritages and occasionally as
colleagues within stage productions.    There is, for me, always a certain
distance required to study a work of art and take into my own life apart
from the life of the artist.     I study them from a distance with respect.
They were and are the angels that balance the demons of history who would
destroy the world for a dollar.     Their work is truly to me a matter of
life and death.   Their stories deserve my most profound study and
relationship as a context for their art but it is the arrow of the Art that
matters to the one encountering it. 

 

This week the last chapter on my hometown was in the New York Times as they
wrote about the old town of Treece, Kansas, the off reservation town where
people could buy Liquor while it was banned in the Quapaw nation.   Amongst
the pictures is a picture of the park that I had helped my father build for
the reservation town of Picher.    The environment was a terrible place, but
music made it tolerable and a doorway for us all.    That music was fed by
the teaching of exceptionally trained musicians fighting the wounds of
poverty and teaching the kids from home.  

 

 
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/20/magazine/last-ones-left-in-treece-kan-a-to
xic-town.html?pagewanted=all 

 

Eva Turner, a soul wounded great soprano who lost everything including her
singing in the war, came to Oklahoma to recover after the war and gave us
hope while on the other side of the conflict was the  Lieder of Dietrich
Fischer-Dieskau, whose war and personal tragedies fed a younger man's art
and fueled his art with hope of something beyond the misery of the moment.


 

Today, that Art has returned to Germany, and England once more has great
singers and a tradition that can feed their culture again.   In spite of the
bickering of government politicians and economists,  and short sighted
"musicians", who forget that generosity is essential for great art -  art is
once more at home in Europe.     They will tell you that it is "their
cultural, intellectual property" just like reservation Indians complaining
about Chinese handicrafts being sold at a Powwow.     

 

The lessons of both Dame Eva and Dieter are that you must find the core of
art for yourself.    No great culture can expect another culture to supply
their identity and soul.   You cannot expect the  English, the Germans, the
French, the Italians or the Russians to supply the soul that is missing in
the center of the American heart.   Old Celtic folk songs in the guise of
commercial entertainment, (though moving, enjoyable, entertaining and well
performed), are no competition for the great blossoming of thousands of Art
Songs across Europe from the 19th century,  handed to us by the wonderful
Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau.      

 

A great culture must have designers, performers and listeners if its soul is
to be expressed.    Only the third group can get away with simple pleasure
and lazy ignorance in the Art.    In all of the years of my listening to
him, Fischer-Dieskau never abused his audience and never played down to
them.   The Art was always alive and immediate.    In all of his concerts,
where I was the listener, he never encouraged me to simply enjoy.    As
members of the audience we were driven to the translations of the texts,
because we wanted to know what all of those magnificent skills were
expressing.    Only an art work of great importance could be so compelling
to an audience that had little history with German poetry and yet was
treated so courteously and seriously.    Great Art is always great
storytelling.     Thank you Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau. 

 

Ray Evans Harrell

 

 

 

May 18, 2012


Lyrical and Powerful Baritone, and the Master of the Art Song


By DANIEL LEWIS


Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau, the German baritone whose beautiful voice and
mastery of technique made him the 20th century’s pre-eminent interpreter of
art songs, died on Friday at his home in Bavaria. He was 86.

His wife, the soprano Julia Varady, confirmed his death to the German press
agency DPA.

 <http://www.nytimes.com/keyword/dietrich-fischer-dieskau> Mr.
Fischer-Dieskau was by virtual acclamation
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fB-Oh9_5wBY> one of the world’s great
singers, from the 1940s to his official retirement in 1992, and an
influential teacher and orchestra conductor for many years thereafter.

He was also a formidable industry, making hundreds of recordings that pretty
much set the modern standard for performances of lieder, the musical
settings of poems first popular in the 18th and 19th centuries. His output
included the many hundreds of Schubert songs appropriate for the male voice,
the songs and song cycles of Schumann and Brahms, and those of later
composers like Mahler, Shostakovich and Hugo Wolf. He won two
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/g/grammy_award
s/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> Grammy Awards, in 1971 for Schubert
lieder, and in 1973 for Brahms’s “Schöne Magelone.”

Mr. Fischer-Dieskau (pronounced FEE-shur-DEES-cow) had sufficient power for
the concert hall and for substantial roles in his parallel career as a star
of European
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/o/opera/index.
html?inline=nyt-classifier> opera houses. But he was essentially a lyrical,
introspective singer whose effect on listeners was not to nail them to their
seat backs, but rather to draw them into the very heart of song.

The pianist Gerald Moore, who accompanied many great artists of the postwar
decades, said Mr. Fischer-Dieskau had a flawless sense of rhythm and “one of
the most remarkable voices in history — honeyed and suavely expressive.”
Onstage he projected a masculine sensitivity informed by a cultivated
upbringing and by dispiriting losses in World War II: the destruction of his
family home, the death of his feeble brother in a Nazi institution,
induction into the Wehrmacht when he had scarcely begun his voice studies at
the Berlin Conservatory.

His performances eluded easy description. Where reviewers could get the
essence of a Pavarotti appearance in a phrase (the glories of a true Italian
tenor!), a Fischer-Dieskau recital was akin to a magic show, with seamless
shifts in dynamics and infinite shadings of coloration and character.

He had the good luck to age well, too. In 1988, at 62, he sang an
all-Schumann program at Carnegie Hall, where people overflowed onto the
stage to hear him. Donal Henahan, then the chief music critic of The New
York Times, noted that Mr. Fischer-Dieskau’s voice had begun to harden in
some difficult passages — but also that he was tall and lean and handsomer
than ever, and had lost none of his commanding presence. Mr. Fischer-Dieskau
described in his memoir “Reverberations” (1989) how his affinity for lieder
had been formed in childhood. “I was won over to poetry at an early age,” he
wrote. “I have been in its thrall all my life because I was made to read it,
because it gave me pleasure, and because I eventually came to understand
what I was reading.”

He discerned, he said, that “music and poetry have a common domain, from
which they draw inspiration and in which they operate: the landscape of the
soul.”

A Shy and Private Child

Albert Dietrich Fischer was born in Berlin on May 28, 1925, the youngest of
three sons of Albert Fischer, a classical scholar and secondary school
principal with relatively liberal ideas about education reform, and his
young second wife, Theodora Klingelhoffer, a schoolteacher. (In 1934 Dr.
Fischer added the hyphenated “Dieskau” to the family name; his mother had
been a von Dieskau, descended from the Kammerherr von Dieskau, for whom J.
S. Bach wrote the “Peasant Cantata.”)

Family members knew Dietrich, as he was called, as a shy, private child who
nonetheless liked to entertain. He put on puppet shows in which he voiced
all the parts, sometimes for an audience of one: his physically and mentally
disabled brother, Martin, with whom he shared a room.

Before adolescence Dietrich was inducted into a Hitler Youth group where, he
recalled years later, he was appalled by the officiousness as well as by the
brutality. His father died when he was 12. And he had just finished
secondary school and one semester at the Berlin Conservatory when, in 1943,
he was drafted into the Wehrmacht and assigned to care for army horses on
the Russian front. He kept a diary there, calling it his “attempt at
preserving an inner life in chaotic surroundings.”

“Poems by Morgenstern,” one entry read. “It is a good idea to learn them by
heart, to have something to fall back on.”

“Lots of cold, lots of slush and even more storms,” read another. “Every day
horses die for lack of food.”

It was in Russia that he heard that his mother had been forced to send his
brother to an institution outside Berlin. “Soon,” he wrote later, “the Nazis
did to him what they always did with cases like his: they starved him to
death as quickly as possible.”

And then his mother’s apartment in Lichterfelde was bombed. Granted home
leave to help her, he found that all that remained of their possessions
could be moved to a friend’s apartment in a handcart. But as early as his
second day home, he and his mother began seeking out “theater, concerts, a
lot of other music — defying the irrational world.”

Prisoner and Music Star

Instead of returning to the disastrous campaign in Russia, he was diverted
to Italy, along with thousands of other German soldiers. There, on May 5,
1945, just three days before the Allies accepted the German surrender, he
was captured and imprisoned. It turned out to be a musical opportunity: soon
the Americans were sending him around to entertain other P.O.W.’s from the
back of a truck. The problem was, they were so pleased with this arrangement
that they kept him until June 1947. He was among the last Germans to be
repatriated.

Still, he was only 22 when he returned for further study at the Berlin
Conservatory. He didn’t stay long. Called to substitute for an indisposed
baritone in Brahms’s “German Requiem,” he became famous practically
overnight. As he said, “I passed my final exam in the concert hall.”

Because of his youth, Mr. Fischer-Dieskau had been in no position to make
his own choices in the 1930s and ’40s, so he didn’t encounter the questions
about Nazi ties that hung over many a prominent German artist after the war.
(The soprano Elisabeth Schwarzkopf, his frequent musical collaborator,
repeatedly denied that she had joined the Nazi Party until confronted with
evidence in 1983. “It was akin to joining a union,” she said in an
explanatory letter to The Times, “and exactly for the same reason: to have a
job.”)

Mr. Fischer-Dieskau gave his first professional lieder recital in Leipzig in
the fall of 1947. Success followed success, with lieder performances in
Britain and other European countries, beginning in 1949. He first toured the
United States in 1955, choosing for his New York debut to sing Schubert’s
demanding “Winterreise” cycle without intermission.

He had made his opera debut in 1948, singing Posa in Verdi’s “Don Carlos” at
Berlin’s Städtische Oper (later renamed the Deutsche Oper), where he was
hired as principal lyric baritone. He also sang regularly at the Bavarian
State Opera in Munich and appeared frequently in the opera houses of Vienna,
Covent Garden, Salzburg and Bayreuth.

Recording Operatic Roles

Versatility was not the least of Mr. Fischer-Dieskau’s assets. He tackled
everything from Papageno in “The Magic Flute” — who knew that a goofy bird
catcher could have immaculate diction? — to heavier parts like Wotan in “Das
Rheingold” and Wolfram in “Tannhäuser.” He recorded more than three dozen
operatic roles, Italian as well as German, along with oratorios, Bach
cantatas and works of many modern composers, including Benjamin Britten,
whose “War Requiem” he sang at its premiere in 1962.

Mr. Fischer-Dieskau was married in 1949 to his sweetheart from his student
days, the cellist Irmgard Poppen. They had three sons: Matthias, who became
a stage designer;  <http://www.martinfischer-dieskau.com/home.html> Martin,
a conductor; and Manuel, a cellist. Ms. Poppen did not live to see them
grow: she died of complications after Manuel’s birth in 1963. For her
husband it was a profound, disorienting loss.

He was married again, to the actress Ruth Leuwerik, from 1965 to 1967, and
again, to Christina Pugel-Schule, the daughter of an American voice teacher,
from 1968 to 1975.

His fourth marriage, to Ms. Varady, the Hungarian soprano, in 1977, was a
rewarding match. Like the many artists who studied with him more formally,
Ms. Varady found him to be a kindly, constructive and totally unsparing
mentor.

Master of Many Trades

Mr. Fischer-Dieskau’s insistence on getting things right comes through
vividly in scenes of him at rehearsal or conducting master class. In a
widely circulated video at the time, showing him coaching a young Christine
Schäfer, Ms. Schäfer is singing beautifully, or so it would seem to your
average mortal, yet the smiling maestro interrupts time and again to suggest
something better. And it isn’t merely that he is invariably correct; it’s
also that when he rises to sing just a few illustrative notes, the studio is
instantly a stage, and he illuminates it with what seems to be an inner
light.

Even better is a documentary by Bruno Monsaingeon, “
<http://www.lovefilm.com/film/Dietrich-Fischer-Dieskau-Autumn-Journey-A-Fran
z-Schubert-Recital/89600/> Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau: Autumn Journey,” with
archival and up-to-date footage of a master at work in his many trades.

Besides making music, he wrote about it: insightful, accessible books about
the lives and music of great composers, including Schubert and Schumann. He
was a widely exhibited painter, too, known especially for his portraits.

Mr. Fischer-Dieskau retired from opera in 1978. He continued giving song
recitals through the end of 1992 and then, on New Year’s Day 1993, announced
that he would sing onstage no more.

Of the many tributes he received over the decades, perhaps none was more
heartfelt than that of the British music critic John Amis:

“Providence gives to some singers a beautiful voice, to some musical
artistry, to some (let us face it) neither, but to Fischer-Dieskau
Providence has given both. The result is a miracle, and that is just about
all there is to be said about it.”

Mr. Amis continued, “Having used a few superlatives and described the
program, there is nothing else to do but write ‘finis,’ go home, and thank
one’s stars for having had the good luck to be present.”

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to