It's interesting Darryl.   

 

Reading the post here 

(and being a senior citizen 

on a fixed income that is 

unable to rise 

with the other incomes around me,) 

 

I'm reminded of everyone 

explaining what's happening 

as if it makes a difference to me.   

 

Or better still that dentist 

doing the root canal for an hour and half

with my mouth full of instruments

and not even the ability to spit.   

 

(Where does the claustrophobia 

kick in and the desire 

to lash out it all take over?)     

 

You make a good point 

about the explainers versus the exploders.   

 

The stiff upper lip 

or the fist in the mouth 

or the farmers from Brittany  

who had flags for each army 

(that marched through)

that they waved on cue 

as they just got out of the way 

and protected their own.     

 

It's an interesting marriage 

you folks have up North 

and it's my understanding 

you're adding 

other new groups regularly to the mix.   

 

The thing I find most interesting is 

the upside down of "liberal."    

 

Fighting words down South from you.    

 

In Canada Liberal is right wing 

while in the U.S. its left wing 

while both continue to express it in English.  

 

Sort of like 

the difference 

between the word

"Fanny" in England 

and "Fanny" in America.    

 

It's rather important to know the domain you are in.    

 

Somehow 

the specifics of the Professor 

seems strangely irrelevant 

when it comes to the solution.

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of D & N
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 11:16 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Quebec's 'Truncheon Law' Rebounds as Student
Strike Spreads

 

For Crane: as Arthur has suggested, the students were not violent in the
first march. Now, after these heavy handed tactics of a government bent on a
totalitarian line, there is violence and, I predict, there will be more.
When laws are instituted that (again) show the governments lack of
willingness to negotiate (and in this vein they have also attacked unions
without warrant - almost as an aside to get another leg up on them) by the
imposition of heavy fines and the seizure of union dues ending with
dissolution of said union, there can only be one reaction by people already
pressed - it is emotional .

The challenges in court will likely fail as the courts are there to uphold
laws - good or bad - that have been instituted.

French (or Quebecois) are passionate and volatile; preferring to make
themselves heard, square off and take their chances in a fight. English (or
Anglophones) are subservient and more or less the sheeple of Huxley's mind;
those who bleat nervously in the midst of the wolves and hope that another
will be louder and so taken instead of them.

For Ray:
Also, it is a gambit that Charest hopes will end in violence as then he can
call on the military through the office of the Harpie to take over the
streets and Canada will be another step closer to a totalitarian corporate
oligarchy with the Anglophonie serfs propping the corporate overlords. Once
the army is set up in Quebec, it is unlikely to be able to break away.

Aside - gee oil is in the $90 range where it was 4 years ago but the price
at the pumps is 40 cents higher (about a 42% increase in price to the
consumer)...Hmmm, Hmmm, Hmmm praise the overlords of industry. I guess the
U.S. needs to wage another war to get the prices up by pouring it all into
military fuel.

D.

On 25/05/2012 7:29 AM, Ray Harrell wrote: 

Might be a Charles de Gaulle in their someplace.    It's happened before.
Might Canada break up before the U.S.?
 
REH
 
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 10:20 AM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Quebec's 'Truncheon Law' Rebounds as Student
Strike Spreads
 
I think there is a division of opinion in Quebec.  Anglophones seem to still
be continuing their studies, while francophones are out in the streets.
Also a division between old and young, both anglo and franco.
 
Two things to consider: the first protest and the second protest in reaction
to the new law.  The second protest is bringing in many from all parts of
the population, or so it seems.
 
Don't see how this can end in a peaceful way.
 
arthur
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of michael gurstein
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 11:15 PM
To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Quebec's 'Truncheon Law' Rebounds as Student
Strike Spreads
 
Interesting how opinions especially in the ROC seem so strongly polarized on
this. 
 
I`m wondering if they are as strongly polarized in Quebec (the article seems
to hint that they are not, that there is significant public support... If
so, I`m wondering what this means and particularly what it means for the
future of Quebec in Canada.
 
M
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 8:07 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION; michael gurstein
Cc: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME
DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Quebec's 'Truncheon Law' Rebounds as Student
Strike Spreads
 
 
Breaking store windows, throwing bricks at police, blocking traffic and
preventing people from going to work (or to the hospital) and setting cars
on fire is not about freedom of speech.
 
Quoting michael gurstein  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>:
 

 
Quebec's 'Truncheon Law' Rebounds as Student Strike Spreads
 
    A draconian law to quell demonstrations has only
    galvanised public support for young Quebecois
    protesting tuition fee hikes
 
by Martin Lukacs
 
Guardian (UK)
May 24, 2012
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/may/24/quebec-
trunch
eon-law-rebounds-student-strike
 
At a tiny church tucked away in a working-class neighbourhood in 
Montreal's east end, Quebec's new outlaws gathered on Sunday for a day 
of deliberations. Aged mostly between 18 and 22, their membership in a 
progressive student union has made them a target of government scorn 
and scrutiny. And they have been branded a menace to society because 
of their
weapons: ideas of social justice and equal opportunity in education, 
alongside the ability to persuade hundreds of thousands to join them 
in

the

streets.
 
Under a draconian law passed by the Quebec government on Friday, their 
very meeting could be considered a criminal act. Law 78 - 
unprecedented in recent Canadian history - is the latest, most 
desperate manoeuvre of a provincial government that is afraid it has 
lost control over a conflict that began as a student strike against 
tuition hikes but has since spread into a protest movement with 
wide-ranging social and environmental demands.
 
Labelled a "truncheon law" by its critics, it imposes severe 
restrictions on the right to protest. Any group of 50 or more 
protesters must submit plans to police eight hours ahead of time; they 
can be denied the right to proceed. Picket lines at universities and 
colleges are forbidden, and illegal protests are punishable by fines 
from $5,000 to $125,000 for individuals and unions - as well as by the 
seizure of union dues and the dissolution of their associations.
 
In other words, the government has decided to smash the student 
movement by force.
 
The government quickly launched a public relations offensive to defend 
itself. Full-page ads in local newspapers ran with the headline: "For 
the sake of democracy and citizenship." Quebec's minister of public 
security, Robert Dutil, prattled about the many countries that have 
passed similar laws:
 
"Other societies with rights and freedoms to protect have found it 
reasonable to impose certain constraints - first of all to protect 
protesters, and also to protect the public."
 
Such language is designed to make violence sound benevolent and infamy 
honourable. But it did nothing to mask reality for those who have 
flooded the streets since the weekend and encountered police 
emboldened by the new legislation. Riot squads beat and tear-gassed 
people indiscriminately, targeted journalists, pepper- sprayed 
bystanders in restaurants, and mass-arrested hundreds, including more 
than 500 Wednesday night - bringing the tally from the last three 
months of protest to a record Canadian high of more than 2,500. The 
endless night-time drone of helicopters has become the serenade song 
of a police state.
 
In its contempt for students and citizens, the government has riled a 
population with strong, bitter memories of harsh measures against 
social unrest - whether the dark days of the iron-fisted Duplessis 
era, the martial law enforced by the Canadian army in 1970, or years 
of labour battles marred by the jailing of union leaders. These and 
other occasions have shown Québécois how the political elite has no 
qualms about trampling human rights to maintain a grip on power.
 
Which is why those with experience of struggle fresh and old have 
answered Premier Jean Charest with unanimity and collective power.
There are now legal challenges in the works, broad appeals for civil 
disobedience, and a brilliant website created by the progressive 
CLASSE student union, on which thousands have posted photos of 
themselves opposing the law. (The website's title is "Somebody arrest 
me" but also puns on a phrase to shake a person out of a crazed mental
spell.)
 
And Wednesday, on the 100th day of the student strike, Québécois 
from every walk of life offered a rejoinder to the claim that 
"marginals" were directing and dominating the
protests: an estimated 300,000-400,000 people marched in the streets, 
another Canadian record, and in full violation of the new law. They 
brandished the iconic red squares that have now transformed into a 
symbol not just of accessible education but the defence of basic 
freedoms of assembly and protest. Late into the night, a spirit of 
jubilant defiance spread through the city. On balconies along entire 
streets, and on intersections occupied by young and old, the sound of 
banging pots and pans rang out, a practice used under Latin American 
regimes.
 
The clarity that has fired the students' protest has, until now, 
conspicuously eluded most of English- speaking Canada. This is because 
the image of the movement has been skewed and distorted by the 
establishment media. Sent into paroxysms of bafflement and contempt by 
the striking students, they have painted them as spoiled kids or 
crazed radicals out of touch with society, who should give up their 
supposed entitlements and accept the stark economic realities of the 
age.
 
All this is said with a straight face. But young people in Quebec, 
followed now by many others, have not been fooled. They know the 
global economic crisis of 2008 exposed as never before the abuses of 
corporate finance, and that those responsible were bailed out rather 
than held to account. They know that meetings of international leaders 
at the G20 end by dispatching ministers home to pay the bills on the 
backs of the poorest and most vulnerable, with tuition hikes and a 
toxic combination of neoliberal economic policies. And with every 
baton blow and tear-gas blast, they perceive with ever greater 
lucidity that their government will turn ultimately to brute violence 
to impose such programs and frighten those who dissent.
 
To those who marched Wednesday, and the great numbers who cheered them 
on, the fault-lines of justice are evident. This is a government that 
has refused to sit down and negotiate with student leaders in good 
faith, but invites an organised crime boss to a fundraising breakfast; 
a government that has claimed free education is an idea not even worth 
dreaming about, when it would cost only 1% of Quebec's budget and 
could be paid for simply by reversing the regressive tax reforms, 
corporate give-aways, or capital tax phase-outs of the last decade; a 
government whose turn to authoritarian tactics has now triggered a 
sharp decline in support, and which has clumsily accelerated a social 
crisis that may now only begin to be resolved by meeting the students'
demands.
 
As the debate went on at the CLASSE meeting in the church last Sunday, 
the students' foresight proved wise beyond their years. "History 
doesn't get made in a day," one argued into the microphone. Not in a 
day, no doubt, but in Quebec, over this spring and the summer, history 
is indeed being made.
 
 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
 

 
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
 
 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
 
 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to