Dunno. I jes reads the paper with m'coffee in the morning.
Seriously, however, there is the odd good columnist in the morning paper. If
I went in to meet him or her, would they take me into a room full of machines
and point me at a computer? Male and female algorithms?
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: D & N
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Automating journalism
Yes, but just how imaginative a narrative can one algo rhythm its way through?
D.
On 13/07/2012 8:29 AM, Ed Weick wrote:
There's nothing wrong with this. We want stories, not facts or
intellectual perceptions.
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: Ray Harrell
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION'
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Automating journalism
First the artists scream and their profession is destroyed. Now it's
gotten to the rest.
REH
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 8:41 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Automating journalism
And one more job lost, one less journalism grad hired.
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of D & N
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 8:09 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Automating journalism
Great! Newspeak! Play that word any way you want to. One small step for
news media. One giant step for propaganda.
D.
On 12/07/2012 4:54 PM, Arthur Cordell wrote:
New reporter? Call him Al, for algorithm
a.. by Rob Lever
The new reporter on the US media scene takes no coffee breaks, churns
out articles at lightning speed, and has no pension plan.
That's because the reporter is not a person, but a computer algorithm,
honed to translate raw data such as corporate earnings reports and previews or
sports statistics into readable prose.
Algorithms are producing a growing number of articles for newspapers
and websites, such as this one produced by Narrative Science:
"Wall Street is high on Wells Fargo, expecting it to report earnings
that are up 15.7 percent from a year ago when it reports its second quarter
earnings on Friday, July 13, 2012," said the article on Forbes.com.
While computers cannot parse the subtleties of each story, they can
take vast amounts of raw data and turn it into what passes for news, analysts
say.
"This can work for anything that is basic and formulaic," says Ken
Doctor, an analyst with the media research firm Outsell.
And with media companies under intense financial pressure, the move to
automate some news production "does speak directly to the rebuilding of the
cost economics of journalism," said Doctor.
Stephen Doig, a journalism professor at Arizona State University who
has used computer systems to sift through data which is then provided to
reporters, said the new computer-generated writing is a logical next step.
"I don't have a philosophical objection to that kind of writing being
outsourced to a computer, if the reporter who would have been writing it could
use the time for something more interesting," Doig said.
Scott Frederick, chief operating officer of Automated Insights, another
firm in the sector, said he sees this as "the next generation of content
creation."
The company got its start in 2007 as StatSheet, which generates news
stories from raw feeds of play-by-play data from major sports events.
The company generates advertising on its own website and is now
beginning to sell its services to other organizations for sports and real
estate news.
"Over the next 12 to 24 months, every media property will need some
automation strategy," Frederick told AFP.
To mimic the effect of the hometown newspaper, the company generates
articles with a different "tonality" depending on the reader's preference or
location.
For the 2012 Super Bowl, the article for New York Giants' fans read
like this: "Hakeem Nicks had a big night, paving the way to a victory for the
Giants over the Patriots, 21-17 in Indianapolis. With the victory, New York is
the champion of Super Bowl XLVI."
For New England fans, the story was different: "Behind an average day
from Tom Brady, the Patriots lost to the Giants, 21-17 at home. With the loss,
New England falls short of a Super Bowl ring."
"Data becomes the seeds of the content trees. When you can create an
entire story out of raw data, that is technologically impressive," Frederick
said.
Kristian Hammond, chief technology officer at Chicago-based Narrative
Science, said he had been involved in computer content generation for more than
a decade.
Hammond is on leave from Northwestern University, where he was on the
computer science faculty and headed a joint project generating content with the
university's journalism school.
The company formed in 2010 has 40 clients including Forbes, and some
corporate clients which use the technology to take spreadsheets or other data
for internal reports that are more readable.
"We're about two-thirds engineering and one-third journalism," he said.
"We knew there were places in traditional journalism where raw data was
used as the driver for telling stories, and we wanted to take that model and
turn it into something a machine can do," he told AFP.
While some articles are reviewed by editors, others are automatically
delivered without human intervention because of client preference or because
the task is too voluminous: Narrative Science, he said, produced stories on
370,000 Little League baseball games in the past year.
The computers cannot pick up on certain things, such as if an injury or
weather affects the game.
"If it's not in the data, we can't say anything about it. We're very
aware of that, but more of what goes on is data-driven," Hammond said.
"The feedback has been very positive. We haven't done anything goofy or
embarrassing so far."
One goof came from a company called Journatic, a partner of the Chicago
Tribune, which uses a combination of human editors in the US and overseas and
computer algorithms to generated "hyperlocal" news.
Some news organizations complained when they discovered the "bylines"
generated were made-up names, not real journalists, in the Tribune, Houston
Chronicle and San Francisco Chronicle, a violation of ethics policies for the
dailies.
Journatic chief executive Brian Timpone said the flap stemmed from a
misunderstanding with news clients and the fact that bylines were needed to be
seen on Google News.
"We're taking them off," Timpone said, arguing that should not distract
attention from the business model which can help media companies.
"The way news is produced has not changed in 50 years," he told AFP.
Timpone said his company can produce news more efficiently "with
technology, lots of local news gathering, and a distributed writing team."
"It's not about algorithms. Algorithms only work if the data is
structured. There's no way to automate everything."
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/reporter-call-him-al-algorithm-190751150.html
_______________________________________________Futurework mailing
[email protected]https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
