Just like they won't insure nuclear power either without a 300 million
dollar cap on liability.   Who are these people who claim that private does
everything better.    Hicks?   Hacks?   or just horse pucky?    But they
love private prisons.   Perhaps if they own the prisons they can escape
being accountable.    How about the selling of a war that drove Iraq into
the arms of Iran?     That wasn't hard to see or predict.   Is there anyone
that has a degree in logical thinking out there or are they all just
"wishers."   


REH


Nationwide Insurance: Fracking Damage Won't Be Covered


AP  |  By  <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-gerken> MARY ESCH Posted:
07/12/2012 7:04 pm

 
<http://plus.google.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2F2012
%2F07%2F13%2Fnationwide-insurance-fracking_n_1669775.html&hl=en-US> Share on
Google+ 

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. has become the first
major insurance company to say it won't cover damage related to a gas
drilling process that blasts chemical-laden water deep into the ground.

The Columbus, Ohio-based company's personal and commercial policies "were
not designed to cover" risk from the drilling process, called hydraulic
fracturing, or fracking, Nationwide spokeswoman Nancy Smeltzer said
Thursday.

The process injects chemically treated water into wells to fracture shale
thousands of feet underground and release trapped gas or oil. There are rich
shale deposits in parts of Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, West Virginia and
elsewhere.

Health and environmental groups claim fracking can contaminate drinking
water. The gas industry says it's safe if done properly. Nationwide said
risks involved in fracking operations "are too great to ignore" and apply to
policies of commercial contractors and landowners who lease property to gas
companies.

The Nationwide policy first came to light when an internal memo detailing
underwriting guidelines was posted on websites of upstate New York
anti-fracking groups and landowner coalitions seeking gas leases. Smeltzer
confirmed that the memo was genuine but said it wasn't intended for public
dissemination.

The memo reads: "After months of research and discussion, we have determined
that the exposures presented by hydraulic fracturing are too great to
ignore. Risks involved with hydraulic fracturing are now prohibited for
General Liability, Commercial Auto, Motor Truck Cargo, Auto Physical Damage
and Public Auto (insurance) coverage."

It said "prohibited risks" apply to landowners who lease land for shale gas
drilling and contractors involved in fracking operations, including those
who haul water to and from drill sites; pipe and lumber haulers; and
operators of bulldozers, dump trucks and other vehicles used in drill site
preparation.

A spokesman for a research and outreach program of the Independent Petroleum
Association of America, whose members drill most of the nation's oil and gas
wells, said nothing in what Nationwide said represented a change in policy
for the company. Simon Lomax, the research director for Energy In Depth,
said insurers don't sell products specific to individual steps of the oil
and gas development process.

"But practical implications aside, the fact that the company would send out
a statement this reckless, and this uninformed, should tell us a lot," Lomax
said in an emailed statement. "For starters, it tells me that I won't be
buying home and car insurance from this company."

Opponents of fracking point to some highly publicized accidents that
resulted in contamination.

In late 2010, Houston-based driller Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. settled for $4.1
million with residents of Dimock, Pa., over gas found in their water. State
environmental regulators determined Cabot contaminated the aquifer
underneath homes with explosive levels of methane. A Cabot spokesman said
levels of contaminants found didn't pose a threat to human health or the
environment.

Jeffrey Hanneman, the Texas-based director of environmental practice at the
insurance broker Aon Risk Solutions, said the Nationwide move was "really
unique" and he doesn't expect it will be the beginning of a trend.

"To date, all we've seen are some that were hesitant to write environmental
coverage," Hanneman said. "But the Nationwide is sort of a broader ban on
all the ancillary services related to it (fracking)."

Hanneman noted that there haven't been any substantial claims that targeted
companies other than those that own and operate the wells or the contractors
who do the drilling. And even those claims have been few and far between.

He said one factor that may be driving Nationwide's decision is that
increasing publicity - much of it negative - surrounding fracking makes it
possible that any damage claims would go beyond the big oil and gas
companies to include the hundreds of supporting businesses such as haulers.

Mike Elmendorf, president of the general contractors' group Associated
General Contractors of New York State, said the Nationwide decision was
unwelcome news for his members who do work for the gas industry and was not
based on facts.

With a record of shale gas development having been done safely, "it is hard
to fathom the rationale for this decision," Elmendorf said. "It would seem
Nationwide is not on job creation's side."

___

 

 

<<image001.png>>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to