That would be great.  It came out at a time when a dozen first-rate books 
appeared linking design to societal change. Many of the them were based on 
cybernetics, systems analysis, and the still-faltering but ever fascinating 
fields of chaos and complexity.  Names (sp?) like: Abrahamson, von Forrester, 
Miller, Aikens, Kaufmann, Bateson, Beer, Fuller, etc. etc. Several of these 
have fallen out of print, unfortunately.

I was fortunate to get to skim a friend's copy of Warfield's excellent book.

Cheers,
Lawry




On Sep 11, 2012, at 11:05 AM, D & N wrote:

> If it still has merit, maybe it should be REprinted.
> 
> D.
> 
> On 11/09/2012 7:58 AM, de Bivort Lawrence wrote:
>> Agreed. It is unfortunate that John's book is no longer available.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Lawry
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 11, 2012, at 10:41 AM, Ray Harrell wrote:
>> 
>>> Things are not automatic.    You have to want things to get better.  When 
>>> there is a political agenda that reacts in opposition, nothing works.   
>>> Markets aren't natural institutions.   They are formed by arbitrary 
>>> decisions based on many things.   They are mega systems.   One problem is 
>>> incompetence but another is recalcitrance and class war.   John Warfield's 
>>> "A Science of Generic Design" is a masterful exploration of mega systems 
>>> and how they work.   They only people who seriously study him is the 
>>> Department of Defense and the Chinese Government.    He's like Deming with 
>>> the Japanese.
>>>  
>>> REH
>>>  
>>> From: [email protected] 
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:13 AM
>>> To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME 
>>> DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
>>> Subject: [Futurework] Central bank money machines fail to spur global 
>>> economy
>>>  
>>> Central bank money machines fail to spur global economy
>>> 
>>> by John W. Schoen, NBC News
>>> Sept. 11, 2012
>>> Read Later
>>>  
>>> Stelios Varias / Reuters rile
>>> 
>>> By John W. Schoen, NBC News
>>> 
>>> Economics 101 says a massive dose of easy money is supposed to be a 
>>> reliable cure for a sluggish economy. For the first time in decades, the 
>>> prescription isn’t working, to the rising frustration of central bankers in 
>>> the U.S. and Europe.
>>> 
>>> Four years and more than $2 trillion after the Federal Reserve opened the 
>>> money spigots following the financial collapse of 2008, the U.S. economy 
>>> remains stuck in the mud.
>>> 
>>> Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, in a widely-watched speech last month in Jackson 
>>> Hole, Wyo., defended the central bank’s past decisions to churn out 
>>> record-breaking volumes of cash -- a process known as “quantitative easing” 
>>> -- saying the policy had prevented a much more painful recession. Bernanke 
>>> also left little doubt that more money may be coming, as early as this 
>>> week’s regular Fed policy meeting.  
>>> 
>>> "It is important to achieve further progress, particularly in the labor 
>>> market," Bernanke said. "The Federal Reserve will provide additional policy 
>>> accommodation as needed."
>>> 
>>> Maintaining steady job growth is half of the Fed’s so-called “dual 
>>> mandate,” the other being inflation control. Based on Friday's monthly jobs 
>>> report, showing fewer than 100,000 new hires in August, the Fed has a lot 
>>> more work to do.
>>> 
>>> All of which has Wall Street convinced it’s a pretty sure bet that the Fed 
>>> is about to fire up its money machine once more, forcing cash into the 
>>> system by buying hundreds of trillions of dollars’ worth of bonds.
>>> 
>>> “That employment report kind of nailed it,” said Michelle Girard, RBS 
>>> senior economist. “The Fed laid out the criteria: we need to see a 
>>> sustained and substantial improvement. And that labor report didn’t show 
>>> it. So the Fed is going to have to make good on their intentions.”
>>> 
>>> But roads paved with good intentions don’t always lead to good places. 
>>> Though investors have bid up stocks on the theory that another massive wave 
>>> of cash has to go somewhere, there’s widening doubt that another money 
>>> flood will boost growth or create more jobs.
>>> 
>>> “What central banks everywhere are doing is trying to make sure people are 
>>> not focused on the world breaking apart,” said Dinakar Singh, CEO of 
>>> TPG-Axon Capital. “Ultimately I don't think lower rates make that much 
>>> difference anymore. There aren't that many people left that haven't 
>>> borrowed money -- companies or people -- but would if rates were lower. “
>>> 
>>> On top of another massive money drop, the Fed may extend its stated promise 
>>> to keep interest rates ultra-low further into the future. Some market 
>>> watchers, and a few Fed policy makers, have expressed concerns those moves 
>>> could do more harm than good.
>>> 
>>> Even as low rates have failed to spur growth, they’re penalizing savers. 
>>> Insurance and pension funds have been hit hard by record low returns needed 
>>> to fund long-term obligations. And, at some point, the Fed will have to 
>>> start selling its massive holdings in bonds, forcing rates higher and 
>>> producing a drag on growth. Discussions about that "exit strategy," 
>>> frequent following the Fed's first round of bond-buying, have all but 
>>> disappeared from recent Fed deliberations.
>>> 
>>> Europe’s central bank, meanwhile, is also embarking on its second round of 
>>> bond buying to try to head off a deepening recession. But the ECB's easy 
>>> money efforts appear to have had even less impact on the eurozone crisis 
>>> than its American counterpart.
>>> 
>>> Central bankers there face a different, and thornier, set of problems. So 
>>> far, they’ve been badly hampered by restrictions on their mandate 
>>> preventing them from intervening to help bail out specific countries in 
>>> trouble.
>>> 
>>> They’ve also been hamstrung by politics, as wealthier northern nations led 
>>> by Germany have opposed the kind of big-money stimulus pioneered by the Fed.
>>> 
>>> Further action could be hampered by a German high court ruling expected 
>>> this week on the constitutionality of a key bailout fund. No matter which 
>>> way the court rules, central bankers in Germany’s Bundesbank -- along with 
>>> millions of that country’s voters -- will likely oppose further ECB 
>>> proposals to flood the continent with money, much of it coming from Germany.
>>> 
>>> “The Bundesbank is now becoming the voice increasingly of conservative 
>>> Germany,” said Jim O'Neill, chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management. 
>>> “It’s the early stages of heading toward what ultimately will be some 
>>> referendum in Germany on a closer euro in which Germany, as part of its DNA 
>>> has to support the others.”
>>> 
>>> ECB intervention to drive down interest rates could worsen the crisis by 
>>> protecting free-spending governments from the financial market punishment 
>>> needed to enforce tighter budget controls.
>>> 
>>> “Its massive support may well discourage profligate governments from 
>>> meeting their fiscal objectives,” said David Rosenberg, chief economist at 
>>> Gluskin Shiff. ”Italy is already backsliding on this front.”
>>> 
>>> Central bankers in China, trying to revive a slumping economy by pumping 
>>> more money into the system, face yet another set of problems this time 
>>> around. Following a series of monthly data showing China’s once-hot growth 
>>> winding down, Beijing last week announced a series of new infrastructure 
>>> projects to try to reverse the downturn.
>>> 
>>> But the measures are much more limited than the massive stimulus undertaken 
>>> following the 2008 collapse. That spending spree left China with more 
>>> roads, bridges, airports and rail lines than it needs. Now, as growth has 
>>> slowed again, inventories of raw materials and finished goods are piling up.
>>> 
>>> Additional government lending and spending risks igniting another round of 
>>> the kind of consumer inflation that swept through China in 2010, forcing up 
>>> food prices and inflating a rapidly expanding real estate bubble.
>>> 
>>> Chinese consumer price inflation appears to be moving higher again, bumping 
>>> up to annual rate of 2.0 percent last month from 1.8 percent in July, and 
>>> is likely to rise above 3 percent early next year, according to Mark 
>>> Williams, chief Asia economist at Capital Insight.
>>> 
>>> “This won’t prevent further stimulus if the economy remains very weak, but 
>>> it does make large policy moves less likely,” he said.
>>> 
>>> Faced with an ongoing global slowdown, though, central bankers around the 
>>> world are loathe to do nothing.  Despite the limited impact of dumping more 
>>> money into the economy, even easy-money skeptics at the Fed will likely go 
>>> along with another round, according to Neal Soss CSFB chief economist.
>>> 
>>> “Even those who doubt the efficacy of monetary policy under current 
>>> circumstances may well feel obliged not to disappoint financial markets,” 
>>> he said. “First, do no harm.“
>>> 
>>> Jim McCaughan, Principal Global Investors CEO, explains why further Fed 
>>> easing is not the best policy decision.
>>> 
>>> More money and business news:
>>> 
>>>  
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Futurework mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Futurework mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to