________________________________________
From: Portside Moderator [[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 11:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: The Better Bargain: Transaction Tax, Not Austerity

The Better Bargain: Transaction Tax, Not Austerity

By Katrina vanden Heuvel
The Nation
September 25, 2012

http://www.thenation.com/blog/170151/better-bargain-transaction-tax-not-austerity?utm

On the eve of Occupy Wall Street's first anniversary,
Congressman Keith Ellison introduced a much-
needed common sense bill: HR 6411, the Inclusive
Prosperity Act. The bill taxes financial transactions
to generate revenue for social needs. Amid our
consensus-narrowed, deficit-obsessed political
debate, it's a call to arms, and a breath of fresh air.

As I've often argued, a financial transaction tax is
deeply pragmatic, broadly popular and sorely
needed. At a time when budget slashing is a
bipartisan obsession, it offers vital revenue. As we
struggle to escape the recession wrought by the 1
percent, it presents a simple solution to discourage
speculation. As progressives fight too many
defensive battles, the financial transaction tax
presents an urgent opportunity to go on offense.

Victory won't come easy. Sarah Anderson, who
directs the Global Economy Project at the Institute
for Policy Studies, notes that "Obama's
communications director was asked about this at a
press event during the convention and didn't get an
enthusiastic response. So that was a disappointing
moment."

But the FTT would never have made it thus far
without sustained and savvy organizing. Groups like
National Nurses United, National People's Action,
and Health GAP have been tenacious in forcing the
FTT onto the agenda. Their European counterparts
have forged a critical mass of support within the EU.
And they're backed on both sides of the pond by a
slew of economists and financial professionals who
wield common sense against Chicken Little
lobbyists.

"I think people are really touched by how much
passion there is around this issue," says Anderson,
"and the fact that they're drawing such diverse
groups together around this tax idea."

Ellison's bill would raise up to $350 billion through
a small tax on stock, bond, derivative and currency
trading.

According to a statement from Ellison's office, the
revenue could go to programs including
infrastructure, job creation and global health.
Congressman Ellison noted that:

    The American public provided hundreds of
    billions to bailout Wall Street during the global
    fiscal crisis yet bore the brunt of the crisis with
    lost jobs and reduced household wealth. This is a
    phenomenally wealthy nation, yet our tax and
    regulatory system allowed the financial titans to
    amass great riches while impoverishing the
    systems that enable inclusive prosperity.

Ellison has it right: America isn't broke. And the
poor and the middle class aren't the ones we should
be looking to for sacrifice.

While other bills including an FTT have been
introduced, Anderson says, "One reason that I see
this one as significant is that the bill is in sync with
the broader international campaign for financial
transaction taxes, in that it specifically mentions
climate and global health programs," among the
uses for new revenue. That international movement
now faces a key test: Reaching formal agreement
from at least nine EU countries on a joint FTT.

While ten nations have expressed support for the
concept, Anderson says there's "a lot of jockeying
going on" now regarding whether derivatives will be
included, and whether the FTT will be tied to a deal
on debt in Spain and Italy. A deal could come as
soon as December, or stretch into next year.

Ellison's bill also comes at a crucial time for US
politics. With weeks left until the presidential
election, and a "fiscal cliff" showdown following
close on its heels, the calls for an austerity-lite
"grand bargain" are reaching a fever pitch. Among
the latest symptoms of deficit madness: the growing
chorus suggesting that Erskine Bowles, deficit panel
co-chair and top austerity advocate, is a frontrunner
for Treasury Secretary in a second Obama term. Top
Democrats-up to and including the president
himself-keep talking up their willingness to cut
social insurance. As economist Dean Baker wrote
recently, with CEOs already gathering to plan a
political assault on these programs regardless of
who wins the election, "The question is whether this
juggernaut can be stopped?. The question is how
to make it so that popular sentiment overrides the
big bucks of the corporate chieftains."

In an interview this week with The Huffington Post,
Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders warned that
"unless we stop it," there will be a deal soon after
the election to reduce cost of living increases for
Social Security.

There is a better way than austerity. The
Congressional Progressive Caucus, led by Ellison
and Congressman Raul Grijalva, has offered a
"Budget for All": tax the top 2 percent, cut unneeded
defense programs, and preserve Social Security,
Medicare and Medicaid. The FTT is a great place to
start.
____________

Katrina vanden Heuvel is Editor and Publisher of The Nation.

She writes a weekly web column for The Washington Post.
Her blog "Editor's Cut" appears at thenation.com.

She is the author of The Change I Believe In: Fighting for
Progress in The Age of Obama (Nation Books, 2011). She i
s also the editor of Meltdown: How Greed and Corruption
Shattered Our Financial System and How We Can Recover
and co-editor of Taking Back America--And Taking Down
The Radical Right.

___________________________________________

Portside aims to provide material of interest to people
on the left that will help them to interpret the world
and to change it.

Submit via email: [email protected]

Submit via the Web: http://portside.org/submittous3

Frequently asked questions: http://portside.org/faq

Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe

Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive

Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to