Negative emotions that generate from suppressed energies and unrealized
expression, creative or simply communicative, are often known to turn
inward; especially, as you state, when balance is out. This does not, of
course, address the cancers of those who are unaware that they have the
disease at birth, say, or those who have had it forced upon them by
inescapable environmental toxins. Cause of cancer is not an easy call,
but in many individuals, illness occurs when the body succumbs to
psychological fatigue. How one responds to its presence will vary
greatly, and have a bearing on healing, healing rates and remission.
And then, we learn that certain chemo and radiation treatments actually
actually cause tumours. One hopes to respond in a way that's best, but
sometimes just living in the moment sends a corrective message. You want
to be certain that decisions are both informed and true to the self.
The astounding case of Anita Moorjani speaks to this aspect of illness
in her documented account of miraculous recovery from stage 4 lymphoma
(organ shut down, coma, huge open lesions, just skin and bones with
lemon-sized tumours throughout her system) and her amazing NDE that
allowed her to experience pure consciousness, allowing true spirit to
shine through to result in complete remission and total absence of
cancer within days of awakening in that new state of awareness. Her
recovery is exceptional in both the medical community and previously
recorded NDEs, and therefore worthy of mention.
Moorjani said in her book that healing was not due to positive mind over
matter, not because of religious figures or sudden awakening during the
NDE, nor from any physical anomaly that might account for the flipped
switch that stopped all cancer growth. She understood that in her own
situation, living in fear of being her true self caused her suppressed
magnificence (which, emphatically, she states we all have) to be
revealed as cancer. That the energy of that magnificence (pure love)
unexpressed is easily powerful enough to manifest reflection in physical
response. She said that her first experience of pure being (in NDE
state) of the soul enabled her to initiate the healing.
She stresses that being and doing are two different states. The former a
state of pure consciousness & unconditional love, allowing awareness of
timelessness, 360 vision, and synesthesia (simultaneous perception of
the senses) and the latter in mind matters such as intellect, putting
food on the table and such. Most of us are too wrapped up in the
/doing/, such that /being/ cannot be fully experienced. She related "
the infinite energy mass as the real me, and the body was only a
barometer to show how much of this life force was "coming through" or
being expressed. It felt as if the 3-D world was the other dimension,
and my energy mass was real."
She asserts that, though she once believed she wasn't spiritual enough
and needed to work harder at it, after the NDE, realized we're all
spiritual, regardless of what we do or believe. "We can't be anything
else, because that's who we are--spiritual beings. We just don't always
realize it." Believing in a certain way is simplistic, and not what she
advocates. She's more focused on self-awareness rather than entrenched
believes that no longer serve us, keeping us in a constant state of
judgment. We get defensive of these beliefs, and discover that our
beliefs start to own us rather than the other way around. Makes it hard
to open up to greater awareness. Awareness, she says, doesn't need
defending, and this suspension of previously held doctrine and dogma
allowed her body to "reset" itself. An absence of belief was required
for her healing.
Upon learning she was in stage 2, Anita left work, changed diets, went
through forgiveness of everyone, then did it again, tried yoga,
meditation, went to India to experience Ayurvedic healing--which worked
well while she stayed in a region where everyone accepted it as real,
then returned to Hong Kong where oncologists' and friends' beliefs led
her to question her seeming healing at the time.
When asked whether healing came about internally, rather than
externally, she replied, "It was neither internal nor external, or I
could say it was both. Once I was no longer expressing from the state of
duality, I realized there's no separation between within and without. I
became the Source of all things, and the Source became me. But if you're
referring to whether I think it's me--as in the ego or physical
self--behind my healing, then no. It emanated from expressing through my
infinite self and knowing that I'm not separate from Source or anything."
She was reluctant to publicly record her experience because she did not
wish for anyone to think they are any less magnificent in a state of
illness. Everyone has their own journey. She feels that her cancer was
related to her sense of self-identity, and her body was letting her know
that her soul was grieving for the loss of her own worth. She expresses
disappointment over $ billions spent on cancer awareness and symptoms
while little is spent on cause itself. Eventually she grew certain that
sharing her experience was part of expression of her true self that
would help those who it could.
Here's her site, where there should be a link to the record of events
and the medical reports. After finally getting a copy from the library,
I decided to buy her book, /Dying to Be Me/, which offers more insight
than the website pages. Hope you find it helpful.
http://anitamoorjani.com/?page_id=159
*Natalia*
<http://anitamoorjani.com/?page_id=159>
On 29/09/2012 11:39 AM, Ray Harrell wrote:
Interesting. You sound like a Cherokee who insists that bad thoughts create
illness. We say that thoughts have power to heal or to hurt. I believe
that it is more complicated than either. However, like riding a single
water ski, it's all a matter of balance and energy. I can tell you that
certain kinds of cancer have no pain until they kill you.
REH
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 2:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] Re: Diminishing life expectancy of the poor
REH wrote:
So feeling bad gives you cancer. Rather than Cancer makes you feel
bad.
I'm not up to date on my science so I'm open to correction. That
said:
+ The immune system is complex (in the technical sense) and not
fully understood. But there is indication that ongoing emotional
states influence its performance.
+ The role of the immune system in controlling cancerous or
potentially cancerous cells is also not fully understood but such
effects exist.
It's easy to infer from those observations that prolonged episodes of
feeling bad may predispose your immune system to fail, both in resistance to
exogenous infection and to endogenous deviant, malignant and potentially
metastatic cells.
Of course, *knowing* you have identifiable, diagnosable cancer will make you
feel bad so there's the possibility for harmful positive feedbac there.
- Mike
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
