We will have to see how this plays out. It may be the beginning of the
fight to remove corporations from the position of suing countries for
restricting profits from polluting or damaging the environment (or
running away from their responsibilities to those who gain them their
profits). Note: China will be jumping on Canadians very soon regarding
the stall of the Oil delivery to the west coast if these corporations
are allowed to continue in their present way.
Darryl
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 'Corporations Are Not People' in Montana, Colorado
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:44:23 -0500
From: Portside Moderator <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
'Corporations Are Not People' in Montana, Colorado
Common Dreams staff
November 7, 2012
www.CommonDreams.org
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/11/07-0
In a landslide victory Tuesday night, Montana voters approved
an initiative stating "that corporations are not entitled to
constitutional rights because they are not human beings" --
corporations are not people.
The initiative directly challenges the now infamous Citizens
United decision, which allows corporations to contribute
unlimited amounts of money for campaign groups know as super
PACS and 'shadow money' organizations.
Initiative 166 will win roughly 75 percent to 25 percent,
according to the likely, but not yet final, results,
Montana's Billings Gazette reports.
The initiative states:
"Ballot initiative I-166 establishes a state policy that
corporations are not entitled to constitutional rights
because they are not human beings, and charges Montana
elected and appointed officials, state and federal, to
implement that policy. With this policy, the people of
Montana establish that there should be a level playing field
in campaign spending, in part by prohibiting corporate
campaign contributions and expenditures and by limiting
political spending in elections..."
The measure, proposed by the group Stand with Montanans, will
determine state policy on prohibiting corporate contributions
and expenditures in state and national elections, and will
charge state lawmakers with furthering the state's policy on
the matter, asking congressional delegates to support efforts
to overrule the Citizens United decision by amending the U.S.
Constitution.
Similarly, Colorado Amendment 65 looks like a victory. 65
instructs Coloradoâ??s congressional delegation to propose and
support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that allows
congress to overturn Citizens United.
Results from the CO Secretary of State show a YES for
Amendment 65 with a margin of 73% with 23 of 64 counties
reporting.
___________________________________________
Portside aims to provide material of interest to people
on the left that will help them to interpret the world
and to change it.
Submit via email: [email protected]
Submit via the Web: http://portside.org/submittous3
Frequently asked questions: http://portside.org/faq
Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe
Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive
Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
