From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Kurtz
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 9:25 AM
Subject: [Ottawadissenters] Most New Jobs Don't Require College Education

 






 

http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content
<http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Item
id=74&jumival=9162> &task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=9162

 

 


Bio


Jeannette Wicks-Lim completed her Ph.D. in economics at the University of
Massachusetts Amherst in 2005. Wicks-Lim specializes in labor economics with
an emphasis on the low-wage labor market and has an overlapping interest in
the political economy of race. Her dissertation, Mandated wage floors and
the wage structure: Analyzing the ripple effects of minimum and prevailing
wage laws, is a study of the overall impact of mandated wage floors on
wages. Specifically, she provides empirical estimates of the extent to which
mandated wage floors cause wage changes beyond those required by law, either
through wage effects that ripple across the wage distribution or spillover
to workers that are not covered by mandated wage floors.

 


Transcript


PAUL JAY, SENIOR EDITOR, TRNN: Welcome to The Real News Network. I'm Paul
Jay in Baltimore.

 

 

A new study has found that two-thirds of American jobs being created and
that are likely to be created only require a high school education or less.
So the idea that people are going to educate themselves out of unemployment
and poverty doesn't seem to have a heck of a perspective.

 

 

Now joining us to talk about this research is Jeannette Wicks-Lim. She's an
assistant research professor at PERI institute at the University of
Massachusetts Amherst. She also writes for theNew Labor Forum, where she has
a new piece called "The Working Poor: A Booming Demographic." Thanks for
joining us again, Jeannette.

 

 

JEANNETTE WICKS-LIM, ASSIST. RESEARCH PROF., PERI: Thanks for having me.

 

 

JAY: So talk about what you found, first of all, in terms of the nature of
jobs that are available, and then what significance that has.

 

 

WICKS-LIM: Right. Well, and just to repeat what you said and just to
underscore this point, because it seems like a lot of the news stories these
days-well, this has been an old news story-is that low-wage workers, what
they really [incompr.] is a college education, and that's what they will-you
know, that will be the key to getting them into a better-paying job and get
them out of a status of working poverty.

 

 

And when you look at what's actually out there in the U.S. economy and the
types of jobs that are offered, what you find is, by the Department of
Labor's own reports, about 70 percent of the jobs that are currently
available, and also the jobs that can be expected to be created between now
and 2020, about 70 percent of them only require a high school degree or less
to have entry-level positions. So a lot of these jobs do not require this
college education that seems to be pushed over and over again in order to
increase the welfare of low-wage workers.

 

 

And what you also find, what I also found when I was looking at these
figures is that you do see that the workforce has become more and more
educated over the last three decades. I mean, if you look at figures from
1979 to 2011, you see that in the workforce, about-we started at about 40
percent of the workforce having some level of college experience, and that's
now reached over 60 percent. At the same time, over the same number of
years, you've seen that workers earning a very low wage rate of $10 an hour
or less, 25 percent of the workforce are in that low wage level. So, you
know, we have the same constant share of very lowly paid jobs, about a
quarter of the workforce.

 

 

Now, what does that mean, you have more and more workers being educated but
you still have a very significant share of workers earning very low wages?
What it means is that you have better and better educated low-wage workers.
So if you look at these $10 an hour or less workers, you see that
between-you know, over the last three decades, there was 25 percent of the
workers who had some college experience, and now you've got 20 percent of
these workers with some college experience. So they are indeed
better-educated. So maybe, you know, they're following this idea that
getting more education will improve their economic status. But in fact what
we find is that the economic status does not improve.

 

 

JAY: So why this change? We're supposedly going into the technology economy
and the information technology and so on and so on, which all supposedly
implies better-educated people will do better.

 

 

WICKS-LIM: Well, I think it's just a misrepresentation of what's happening
in the U.S. workforce. And what you often will hear, if you listen
carefully, in news reports about what's happening with the workforce, what
you often will hear people say is that the fastest-growing jobs are in these
high-tech fields that require a high level of educational credentials and
that, you know, pay good wages. Well, these jobs take up a very small share
of the workforce, so they may indeed be growing very fast. They represent a
very small number of workers in the overall economy.

 

 

Instead what's [incompr.] the mainstay in terms of work in the U.S. economy
are these jobs that only require a high school degree or less. They're
usually tied to the service economy. So if you look-again, this is something
that's reported by the Department of Labor. One of the things that they
report among the top 30 occupations with the largest job growth, between
what they are projecting, between 2010 and 2020, that amongst those top 30
jobs, many of them are very low wage jobs, very low wage occupations.

 

 

And what I did, actually, in this recent piece that I did is that I compared
the occupations in this list of the top 30 occupations with the largest job
growth over the next ten years to the most common jobs held by the working
poor. In fact, the majority of the occupations in both these lists are the
same. In other words, the jobs that are adding the most number of jobs, the
ones that are expected to add the most number of jobs over the next ten
years, are the same kinds of jobs that the working poor hold. So that's
really a more accurate description of what are the most common, most
prevalent, the jobs that are going to be adding the most new positions over
the next ten years are these kinds of jobs. And you can imagine what these
jobs are-you know, consist of. They're jobs like janitors, security guards,
childcare workers, home health care aides, those types of positions. And
those are positions that people, you know, are pretty well aware are pretty
common in the U.S. economy, and they just, in fact, make up a large
proportion of the workforce.

 

 

JAY: And, of course, the other thing that's happening is that even jobs that
traditionally paid significantly more, like in the auto industry, where it
used to be a starting worker would make $24 to $26 an hour to begin, the new
contracts now have starting workers at $14, or even less in some-in auto
parts manufacturing, and the kind of two-tier contracts are happening all
over the country. So even those working class jobs that in theory did pay
more are disappearing.

 

 

WICKS-LIM: Yeah, that's true. I think what we've been seeing in the recent
decades is a large growth in jobs that pay very low wages, and then some
growth in jobs that pay very high wages, and those sort of middle-income
jobs that pay decent wages, the ones that you were just talking about, the,
you know, auto manufacturing jobs, their pay is either decreasing, or their
jobs are going overseas.

 

 

JAY: And of course that has pretty broad implications for the whole economy
as well, because, I mean, we've been saying on The Real News-and I can-it's
probably rather obvious to people that if demand doesn't increase, if more
people can't buy more stuff, then the economy continues to stagnate. But
that means higher wages, and in fact things are moving in the opposite
direction.

 

 

WICKS-LIM: Right. [incompr.] other interesting thing to point out is that a
lot of these low-wage jobs that are, you know, this large share of the
workforce, these are jobs that are not going to be, you know, pushed
offshore. They're not jobs that are easily-I don't know what the right word
is, but you can't, you know, replace them easily with machines. So, you
know, jobs like a childcare worker or a home health aide, these are jobs
that need to be done by people within the U.S. border. So these jobs
actually have the potential to be, you know, improved, because it's not easy
to say, well, you know, a firm isn't going to just ship them off to another
country, and it's not-they're not positions that are easily, you know, done
away with by replacing them with machines. So these are jobs that have
potential to become better-quality jobs.

 

 

But you do need-what I argue in the piece is you need a stronger labor
movement.

 

 

JAY: Thanks for joining us, Jeannette.

 

 

WICKS-LIM: Thank you, Paul.

 

 


End


 






__._,_.___

 
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97476590/grpId=15209059/grpspId=1705083512/msgI
d=21399/stime=1354199135> 



Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
Change settings via the Web
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ottawadissenters/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJnMTFhdGs0BF
9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzE1MjA5MDU5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MzUxMgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsaw
NzdG5ncwRzdGltZQMxMzU0MTk5MTM1>  (Yahoo! ID required) 
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Email%20Delivery:%20
Digest>  | Switch to Fully Featured
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Change%20Deliv
ery%20Format:%20Fully%20Featured>  
Visit Your Group
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ottawadissenters;_ylc=X3oDMTJlOXBpbnBqBF9TAzk
3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzE1MjA5MDU5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MzUxMgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNocGY
Ec3RpbWUDMTM1NDE5OTEzNQ--> | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> | Unsubscribe
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe> 





__,_._,___

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to