-----Original Message-----
From: Portside Moderator [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 4:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [SPAM] Money Can't Buy Them Love

Money Can't Buy Them Love

Robert Kuttner Dec 9, 2012
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/fix-the-debt_b_2268952.html

It is literally possible to have more money than you know what to do with.
Take the case of the private- equity billionaire Peter G. Peterson, who has
bankrolled much of the austerity crusade.

Peterson has now spent over half a billion dollars out of his personal
fortune to persuade Americans that austerity is the necessary road to
recovery. But the debate seems to be getting away from him. Peterson was
heavily involved in the corporate-led group, "Fix the Debt." That effort has
increasingly backfired. In Peterson's world, CEO spokesmen are a source of
great credibility. But out in America, it doesn't looks so good when the
millionaire CEOs who cut jobs and pay low rates of taxes lecture others to
tighten their belts.

Time for a new set of spokesmen. Peterson's latest front group is something
called the Coalition for Fiscal and National Security, which ran full-page
ads in major newspapers last week. The gimmick, as the ad declared, is that
"U.S. National Security in the 21st century rests on both economic and
military strength."
So if you want to keep al-Qaeda at bay, it logically follows that we need to
cut Social Security and Medicare. Well, it does in Peterson's circle.

The ad was signed by doddering former national security officials such as
Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, James Baker, Sam Nunn, et al. They
should know plenty about national security and the debt, having run up
trillions of dollars in excess military spending.

Poor Pete Peterson is running out of categories of concerned citizens to
associate with the austerity cause. What will it be next? Poodle breeders to
cut the debt? Nascar racers?

At this rate, Peterson will soon join the club of people like Sheldon
Adelson, the Koch brothers, and Karl Rove, who spent hundreds of billions of
dollars and had just about zero influence for their trouble.
Sometimes, money can't buy you love. Sometimes, it only buys poor judgment
and makes you look faintly ridiculous.

The idea that recovery depended on austerity was always foolishness.
Peterson's ploy was to make it a bipartisan cause, with Democrats agreeing
to slit their own throats by agreeing with Republicans to cut Social
Security and Medicare for the same of reassuring the bond markets. But the
bond markets are doing just fine, thanks to record low interest rates that
turn out to have a lot more to do with Federal Reserve policy than with
deficit projections. And President Obama has belatedly realized that the
Peterson-Simpson-Bowles austerity axis doesn't exactly serve his political
self-interest.

Meanwhile, it is dawning on Peterson's Republican Party allies that they are
painted into a corner of their own creation. The Bush tax cuts expire
January 1. If the Republicans hold out for tax cuts on the top two percent,
they are responsible when taxes go up on everyone else -- and this time
President Obama isn't blinking first.

Today, on Fox News, one of the Republican leaders, Sen.
Bob Corker of Tennessee, went wobbly on taxes because he had a Eureka
Moment. If Republicans agree to raise taxes on the richest, he said, that
puts away the tax issue, and "all of a sudden, the [debate] goes back to
entitlements and maybe it puts us in a place where we actually can do
something that really saves the nation."

Uh, no it doesn't. Alas, the Republican version of entitlement reform is
built on some really unpopular measures that don't even save much money,
such as raising the Medicare eligibility age to 67, while Obama has moved
away from the austerity kick.

Which is more popular and more sensible -- raising the Medicare eligibility
age, or allowing Medicare to negotiate bulk discounts with drug companies?
How does a truly unpopular Republican position translate into good politics?
Look how quickly the Republicans dropped the Medicare voucher idea.

Obama's old position, echoing the line of the Peterson crusade, was that we
needed to get $4 trillion in deficit cuts over a decade. Now, however, Obama
has sensibly recognized that the budget has already been cut by at least
$1.5 trillion by recent budget deals, most notably the very 2011 budget
legislation that gave America the fiscal cliff.

That means far less deficit reduction, Obama is proposing to get most of it
from tax increases on the wealthy. If Republicans stick with a larger
deficit reduction number, that requires more unpopular cuts in Social
Security and Medicare, and more "reform" of tax breaks that the middle class
receives, such as the mortgage interest deduction. Uh-oh.

The fiscal cliff has had the opposite effect from the one that its
too-clever sponsors intended. It has revealed the backward economic
assumptions of the Peterson austerity crusade and the self-serving motives
of its sponsors. And it has thrown into sharp relief the political
unpopularity of Republican positions on taxes and on social insurance.

As Republicans try to walk back their position of no tax increases on
anyone, any time (even billionaires, even if the result is cuts in Social
Security and Medicare), watch for Republicans to turn on each other.

It's December. Maybe there is a Santa Claus.


Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and a senior fellow at
Demos. Follow Robert Kuttner on
Twitter: www.twitter.com/rkuttner and on Facebook:
www.facebook.com/RobertKuttner

___________________________________________

Portside aims to provide material of interest to people on the left that
will help them to interpret the world and to change it.

Submit via email: [email protected]

Submit via the Web: http://portside.org/submittous3

Frequently asked questions: http://portside.org/faq

Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe

Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive

Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate


!DSPAM:2676,50c6a28a25481867513312!

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to