Thanks for this.  Both powerful and frustrating at the same time.  I like
the saying

" some people can't read the writing on the wall until their backs are up
against it".  Will this hold true for the US as well?  And perhaps in a
lesser way, in other ways, for Canada?

 

arthur

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 12:17 PM
To: EDUCATION RE-DESIGNING WORK INCOME DISTRIBUTION
Subject: [Futurework] old myths falling away

 

Ray, could this kind of thinking be what the Mayans were alluding to with
their cyclic calendar?

 

Hope you all have a very pleasant and fruitful new year!

 

Barry

 

http://www.alternet.org/visions/everything-we-tell-ourselves-about-america-a
nd-world-wrong?akid=9884.111339.4V9uzZ
<http://www.alternet.org/visions/everything-we-tell-ourselves-about-america-
and-world-wrong?akid=9884.111339.4V9uzZ&rd=1&src=newsletter769265&t=3>
&rd=1&src=newsletter769265&t=3

 

 


Everything We Tell Ourselves About America and the World Is Wrong


Why we need a new story that gives meaning to the world.

December 29, 2012  |   

Every culture has a Story of the People to give meaning to the world. Part
conscious and part unconscious, it consists of a matrix of agreements,
narratives, and symbols that tell us why we are here, where we are headed,
what is important, and even what is real. I think we are entering a new
phase in the dissolution of our Story of the People, and therefore, with
some lag time, of the edifice of civilization built on top of it.

Sometimes I feel intense nostalgia for the cultural mythology of my youth, a
world in which there was nothing wrong with soda pop, in which the Superbowl
was important, in which the world's greatest democracy was bringing
democracy to the world, in which science was going to make life better and
better. Life made sense. If you worked hard you could get good grades, get
into a good college, go to grad school or follow some other professional
path, and you would be happy. With a few unfortunate exceptions, you would
be successful if you obeyed the rules of our society: if you followed the
latest medical advice, kept informed by reading the New York Times, and
stayed away from Bad Things like drugs. Sure there were problems, but the
scientists and experts were working hard to fix them. Soon a new medical
advance, a new law, a new educational technique, would propel the onward
improvement of life. My childhood perceptions were part of this Story of the
People, in which humanity was destined to create a perfect world through
science, reason, and technology, to conquer nature, transcend our animal
origins, and engineer a rational society.

>From my vantage point, the basic premises of this story seemed
unquestionable. After all, it seemed to be working in my world. Looking
back, I realize that this was a bubble world built atop massive human
suffering and environmental degradation, but at the time one could live
within that bubble without need of much self-deception. The story that
surrounded us was robust. It easily kept anomalous data points on the
margins.

Since my childhood in the 1970s, that story has eroded at an accelerating
rate. More and more people in the West no longer believe that civilization
is fundamentally on the right track. Even those who don't yet question its
basic premises in any explicit way seem to have grown weary of it. A layer
of cynicism, a hipster self-awareness has muted our earnestness. What was
once so real, say a plank in a party platform, today is seen through several
levels of "meta" filters to parse it in terms of image and message. We are
like children who have grown out of a story that once enthralled us, aware
now that it is only a story.

At the same time, a series of new data points has disrupted the story from
the outside. The harnessing of fossil fuels, the miracle of chemicals to
transform agriculture, the methods of social engineering and political
science to create a more rational and just society - each has fallen far
short of its promise, and brought unanticipated consequences that threaten
civilization. We just cannot believe anymore that the scientists have
everything well in hand. Nor can we believe that the onward march of reason
will bring on social utopia.

Today we cannot ignore the intensifying degradation of the biosphere, the
malaise of the economic system, the decline in health, or the persistence
and indeed growth of global poverty and inequality. We once thought
economists would fix poverty, political scientists would fix social
injustice, chemists and biologists would fix environmental problems, the
power of reason would prevail and we would adopt sane policies. I remember
looking at maps of rain forest decline in National Geographic in the early
1980s and feeling both alarm and relief - relief because at least the
scientists and everyone who reads National Geographic is aware of the
problem now, so something surely will be done.

Nothing was done. Rainforest decline accelerated, along with nearly every
other environmental threat that we knew about in 1980. Our Story of the
People trundled forward under the momentum of centuries, but with each
passing decade the hollowing-out of its core, that started perhaps with the
industrial-scale slaughter of World War One, extended further. When I was a
child, our system of ideology and mass media still protected that story, but
in the last thirty years the incursions of reality have punctured its
protective shell and have ruptured its essential infrastructure. We no
longer believe our storytellers, our elites. We don't believe the
politicians, we don't believe the doctors, we don't believe the professors,
we don't believe the bankers, we don't believe the technologists. All of
them imply that everything is under control, and we know that it is not. We
have lost the vision of the future we once had; most people have no vision
of the future at all. This is new for our society. Fifty or a hundred years
ago, most people agreed on the general outlines of the future. We thought we
knew where society was going. Even the Marxists and the capitalists agreed
on its basic outlines: a paradise of mechanized leisure and scientifically
engineered social harmony, with spirituality either abolished entirely or
relegated to a materially inconsequential corner of life that happened
mostly on Sundays. Of course there were dissenters from this vision, but
this was the general consensus.

When a story nears its end it goes through death throes, an exaggerated
semblance of life. So today we see domination, conquest, violence, and
separation take on absurd extremes that hold a mirror up to what was once
hidden and diffuse. The year 2012 ended with just such a potent
story-disrupting event: the Sandy Hook massacre. Even realizing that far
more, equally innocent, children have been killed in the last few years by,
say, U.S. drone strikes, it really got under my skin. No one was immune. I
think that is because its utter senselessness penetrated every defense
mechanism we have to maintain the fiction that the world is basically OK.
Unlike 9/11 or Oklahoma City, and certainly unlike the horrors that go on
around the world, there was no convenient narrative to divert the raw pain
of what happened. We cannot help but map those murdered innocents onto the
young faces we know, and the anguish of their parents onto ourselves. At the
base of our Story of the People is separation, of humanity from nature, of
me from you, of each from all, and this event united everyone, of whatever
culture, nationality, or political persuasion. For a moment, we all felt the
exact same thing. For at least a moment, I am sure, most people were in
touch with the simplicity of what is important; I am sure many people had
that fleeting feeling, "It doesn't have to be that difficult, if only we
could remember what is so obvious now, that love is all there is." We humans
have made such a mess of things, forgetting love. It is the same realization
we have when a loved one is going through the dying process, and we think,
"Ah, how precious this person is - why couldn't I see that? Why couldn't I
appreciate all those moments we had together? All the arguments and grudges
seem so tiny now."

Following that moment, of course, people hurried to make sense of the event,
subsuming it within a narrative about gun control, mental health, or the
security of school buildings. Maybe I am imagining things, but I don't think
anyone really believes deep down that these responses touch the heart of the
matter. Gun culture, we know, is a symptom of something deeper, and the
violence that finds expression through guns would, even in their absence,
come out in some other way. Mental illness too is a problem so vast that it
is essentially unsolvable in our current system; it too comes from a deeper
source. As for school security, a Chinese saying describes all the measures
proposed: they stop the gentleman but not the villain.

No one would say that Sandy Hook was more horrible than the Holocaust, the
Stalinist purges, or the imperialistic wars of the 20th century and 21st,
but it was less comprehensible. Try as we might, we cannot fit it into our
Story of the World. It is the anomalous data point that unravels the entire
narrative - the world no longer makes sense. We struggle to explain what it
means, but no explanation suffices. We may go on pretending that normal is
still normal, but this is one of a series of "end time" events that is
dismantling our culture's mythology.

The evident futility of the responses that we are capable of imagining also
points to this deep ideological breakdown. The responses are all about more
control. Yet control, as we may or may not realize, is a key thread of the
old story of humanity rising above nature, imposing technology and reason on
the wild world and the uncivilized human. All around us, we see our efforts
at control backfiring: wars to fight terrorism breed terrorism, herbicides
breed superweeds, antibiotics breed superbugs, psychiatric medications lead
to explosive outbursts of violence.

Looking back on the community schools a couple generations past, where
children and parents could walk in and out of any door, can we say that the
inexorable trend toward fortress schools in a fortress state is something
anyone would have chosen? The world was supposed to be getting better. We
were supposed to be becoming wealthier, more enlightened. Society was
supposed to be advancing. Here I am in America, the most "advanced" nation
on Earth, yet even as our financial wealth has doubled and doubled again in
fifty years, we have lost wealth of a more basic form; for example, the
social capital of feeling safe, feeling at home where we live. Is more
security the best we can aspire to? What about a society where safety does
not equal security? What about a world where no human being wields an
assault rifle? What about a world where we mostly know the faces and stories
of the people around us? What about a world where we know that our daily
activities contribute to the healing of the biosphere and the well-being of
other people? We need a Story of the People that includes all of those
things - and that doesn't feel like a fantasy.

Various visionary thinkers have offered versions of such a story, but none
of them has yet become a true Story of the People, a widely accepted set of
agreements and narratives that gives meaning to the world and coordinates
human activity towards its fulfillment. We are not quite ready for such a
story yet, because the old one, though in tatters, still has large swaths of
its fabric intact. And even when these unravel, we still must traverse the
space between stories, a kind of nakedness. In the turbulent times ahead our
familiar ways of acting, thinking, and being will no longer make sense. We
won't know what is happening, what it all means, and, sometimes, even what
is real. Some people have entered that time already.

I wish I could tell you that I am ready for a new Story of the People, but
even though I am among its many weavers, I cannot yet fully inhabit the new
vestments. In other words, describing the world that could be, something
inside me doubts, rejects, and underneath the doubt is a hurting thing. The
breakdown of the old story is kind of a healing process, that uncovers the
old wounds hidden under its fabric and exposes them to the healing light of
awareness. I am sure many people reading this have gone through such a time,
when the cloaking illusions fell away: all the old justifications,
rationalizations, all the old stories. Events like Sandy Hook help to
initiate the very same process on a collective level. So also the
superstorms, the economic crisis, political meltdowns. in one way or
another, the obsolescence of our old mythos is laid bare.

We do not have a new story yet. Each of us is aware of some of its threads,
for example in most of the things we call alternative, holistic, or
ecological today. Here and there we see patterns, designs, emerging parts of
the fabric. But the new mythos has not yet emerged. We will abide for a time
in the space between stories. Those of you who have been through it on a
personal level know that it is a very precious - some might say sacred -
time. Then we are in touch with the real. Each disaster lays bare the real
underneath our stories. The terror of a child, the grief of a mother, the
honesty of not knowing why. In such moments we discover our humanity. We
come to each other's aid, human to human. We take care of each other. That's
what keeps happening every time there is a calamity, before the beliefs, the
ideologies, the politics take over again. Events like Sandy Hook, for at
least a moment, cut through all that down to the basic human being. In such
times, we learn who we really are.

How can we prepare? We cannot prepare. But we are being prepared.

Charles Eisenstein is an essayist and author of the books Sacred Economics
<http://www.realitysandwich.com/homepage_sacred_economics>  and The Ascent
of Humanity <http://www.ascentofhumanity.com/> . He is a contributor to
Shareable <http://www.shareable.net/> , where this article first appeared.  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to