I would remind you Keith that Elizabeth Warren is a real Oklahoman of
Cherokee descent.      No matter what the government fauxs  said about her,
she is  one who lives what it means to be a Cherokee from Oklahoma.    If
you don't believe me then read the history of the Cherokee Lawyer's
Association and the thousands of pages of litigation before the Cherokee
Supreme Court before the Old Cherokee Nation was disbanded by the Yonega
government in Washington. 

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 11:26 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION; D & N
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Obamadmin banksterganster cover-up

 

Gangster-bankers are not too big to jail. Nor are banks too large not to be
slammed into administration if necessary. Governments will never do their
job properly (that is, looking after ordinary folk) until senior politicians
and civil servants are paid a great deal more than at present (in order to
avoid corruption by richer folk).

Keith

At 17:25 16/02/2013, D & N wrote:




http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/gangster-bankers-too-big-to-jail-2
0130214 




Gangster Bankers: Too Big to Jail







How HSBC hooked up with drug traffickers and terrorists. And got away with
it




by  Matt Taibbi <http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog>  
February 14, 2013 8:00 AM ET

The deal was announced quietly, just before the holidays, almost like the
government was hoping people were too busy hanging stockings by the
fireplace to notice. Flooring politicians, lawyers and investigators all
over the world, the U.S. Justice Department granted a total walk to
executives of the British-based bank HSBC for the largest drug-and-terrorism
money-laundering case ever. Yes, they issued a fine - $1.9 billion, or about
five weeks' profit - but they didn't extract so much as one dollar or one
day in jail from any individual, despite a decade of stupefying abuses.

People may have outrage fatigue about Wall Street, and more stories about
billionaire greedheads getting away with more stealing often cease to amaze.
But the HSBC case went miles beyond the usual paper-pushing,
keypad-punching- sort-of crime, committed by geeks in ties, normally
associated- with Wall Street. In this case, the bank literally got away with
murder - well, aiding and abetting it, anyway.

Daily Beast: HSBC Report Should Result in Prosecutions, Not Just Fines, Say
Critics
<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/18/hsbc-report-should-result-
in-prosecutions-not-just-fines-say-critics.html> 

For at least half a decade, the storied British colonial banking power
helped to wash hundreds of millions of dollars for drug mobs, including
Mexico's Sinaloa drug cartel, suspected in tens of thousands of murders just
in the past 10 years - people so totally evil, jokes former New York
Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, that "they make the guys on Wall Street look
good." The bank also moved money for organizations linked to Al Qaeda and
Hezbollah, and for Russian gangsters; helped countries like Iran, the Sudan
and North Korea evade sanctions; and, in between helping murderers and
terrorists and rogue states, aided countless common tax cheats in hiding
their cash.

"They violated every goddamn law in the book," says Jack Blum, an attorney
and former Senate investigator who headed a major bribery investigation
against Lockheed in the 1970s that led to the passage of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act. "They took every imaginable form of illegal and illicit
business."

That nobody from the bank went to jail or paid a dollar in individual fines
is nothing new in this era of financial crisis. What is different about this
settlement is that the Justice Department, for the first time, admitted why
it decided to go soft on this particular kind of criminal. It was worried
that anything more than a wrist slap for HSBC might undermine the world
economy. "Had the U.S. authorities decided to press criminal charges," said
Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer at a press conference to announce
the settlement, "HSBC would almost certainly have lost its banking license
in the U.S., the future of the institution would have been under threat and
the entire banking system would have been destabilized."

It was the dawn of a new era. In the years just after 9/11, even being
breathed on by a suspected terrorist could land you in extralegal detention
for the rest of your life. But now, when you're Too Big to Jail, you can cop
to laundering terrorist cash and violating the Trading With the Enemy Act,
and not only will you not be prosecuted for it, but the government will go
out of its way to make sure you won't lose your license. Some on the Hill
put it to me this way: OK, fine, no jail time, but they can't even pull
their charter? Are you kidding?

But the Justice Department wasn't finished handing out Christmas goodies. A
little over a week later, Breuer was back in front of the press, giving a
cushy deal to another huge international firm, the Swiss bank UBS, which had
just admitted to a key role in perhaps the biggest antitrust/price-fixing
case in history, the so-called LIBOR scandal, a massive
interest-rate-rigging conspiracy involving hundreds of trillions
("trillions," with a "t") of dollars in financial products. While two minor
players did face charges, Breuer and the Justice Department worried aloud
about global stability as they explained why no criminal charges were being
filed against the parent company.

"Our goal here," Breuer said, "is not to destroy a major financial
institution."

A reporter at the UBS presser pointed out to Breuer that UBS had already
been busted in 2009 in a major tax-evasion case, and asked a sensible
question. "This is a bank that has broken the law before," the reporter
said. "So why not be tougher?"

"I don't know what tougher means," answered the assistant attorney general.

Also known as the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, HSBC has
always been associated with drugs. Founded in 1865, HSBC became the major
commercial bank in colonial China after the conclusion of the Second Opium
War. If you're rusty in your history of Britain's various wars of Imperial
Rape, the Second Opium War was the one where Britain and other European
powers basically slaughtered lots of Chinese people until they agreed to
legalize the dope trade (much like they had done in the First Opium War,
which ended in 1842).

A century and a half later, it appears not much has changed. With its strong
on-the-ground presence in many of the various ex-colonial territories in
Asia and Africa, and its rich history of cross-cultural moral flexibility,
HSBC has a very different international footprint than other Too Big to Fail
banks like Wells Fargo or Bank of America. While the American banking
behemoths mainly gorged themselves on the toxic residential-mortgage trade
that caused the 2008 financial bubble, HSBC took a slightly different path,
turning itself into the destination bank for domestic and international
scoundrels of every possible persuasion.

Three-time losers doing life in California prisons for street felonies might
be surprised to learn that the no-jail settlement Lanny Breuer worked out
for HSBC was already the bank's third strike. In fact, as a mortifying
334-page report issued by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on
Investigations last summer made plain, HSBC ignored a truly awesome quantity
of official warnings.

In April 2003, with 9/11 still fresh in the minds of American regulators,
the Federal Reserve sent HSBC's American subsidiary a cease-and-desist-
letter, ordering it to clean up its act and make a better effort to keep
criminals and terrorists from opening accounts at its bank. One of the
bank's bigger customers, for instance, was Saudi Arabia's Al Rajhi bank,
which had been linked by the CIA and other government agencies to terrorism.
According to a document cited in a Senate report, one of the bank's
founders, Sulaiman bin Abdul Aziz Al Rajhi, was among 20 early financiers of
Al Qaeda, a member of what Osama bin Laden himself apparently called the
"Golden Chain." In 2003, the CIA wrote a confidential report about the bank,
describing Al Rajhi as a "conduit for extremist finance." In the report,
details of which leaked to the public by 2007, the agency noted that
Sulaiman Al Rajhi consciously worked to help Islamic "charities" hide their
true nature, ordering the bank's board to "explore financial instruments
that would allow the bank's charitable contributions to avoid official Saudi
scrutiny." (The bank has denied any role in financing extremists.)

(snip--part 1 of 4)

Read more:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/gangster-bankers-too-big-to-jail-2
0130214#ixzz2L5Ffyhiz 
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter
<http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bbJxak64Kr4kEzacwqm_6l&u=rollingstone>  |
RollingStone on Facebook
<http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bbJxak64Kr4kEzacwqm_6l&u=RollingStone> 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to