After a lifetime trying to make sense of things my late mathematician friend
finally concluded that  "life is a crapshoot".

Arthur


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 4:39 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Are We Standing at the End of Times or Before an
Intoxicating Dawn?

How about in the Arts where everyone has a degree and 2% work at full time
jobs.   Pure, raw luck.

REH

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of pete
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 2:23 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Are We Standing at the End of Times or Before an
Intoxicating Dawn?


Maybe, but not divided along the lines anyone expects. It may be neither the
rich nor the smart that win, nor the poor nor the dumb that lose.
It may hinge on who is most ready to cooperate and collaborate, or it may
just bubble in random chaotic clusters.

 -Pete

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013, michael gurstein wrote:

> Or, and this is the fundamental flaw of the Ted-oids is it 
> both--utopia for some and dystopia for the rest.
> 
>  
> 
> M
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur 
> Cordell
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 2:37 AM
> To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
> Subject: [Futurework] Are We Standing at the End of Times or Before an 
> Intoxicating Dawn?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Kurtz
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 8:45 PM
> Subject: [Ottawadissenters] Are We Standing at the End of Times or 
> Before an Intoxicating Dawn?
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  <http://www.nytimes.com/> The New York Times
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   _____
> 
> March 8, 2013
> 
> 
> Are We Standing at the End of Times or Before an Intoxicating Dawn?
> 
> 
> By ANAND GIRIDHARADAS
> <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/anand_gi
> ridhar
> adas/index.html>
> 
> 
> LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA - This foolish, callous world of ours is en 
> route to hell. Or this is the best the world has ever been.
> 
> One of the stranger features of our time is the jousting and mingling 
> of these two rhetorics. You hear them so often that you can forget how 
> extreme and contradictory they are.
> 
> Europe and the United States as we know them - and, ergo, civilization 
> itself - are toast. The ecosystem is falling apart. Your texting 
> children will grow up illiterate. China's sky will soon be rotating 
> among 50 shades of black. The middle class? Finished.
> 
> Oh, but: We live in glorious new times in which an illiterate, 
> malnourished African child can text-message her way to democracy; 
> upload her version of the "Harlem Shake" to YouTube on that smartphone 
> she hopefully owns and become a viral star; and perhaps even avail of 
> that 3-D printer in her refugee camp and finally make those toys her
parents never could buy her.
> 
> Each of these rhetorics must be taken with a truckload of salt. But it 
> is true that this is simultaneously a time of real fecundity and real 
> withering, of astonishing innovation and unbelievable breakdown, of 
> great gains that so often fail to make ordinary lives less grinding 
> and
bleak.
> 
> To spend a few days ricocheting between these rhetorics, attend the 
> annual TED conference - it stands for technology, entertainment and 
> design - which this year served up a heady stew of claims that the 
> world either is going to the dogs or is awesome squared.
> 
> It began, aptly enough, with a debate between two men about whether 
> human progress was over or perhaps just getting started. The scary 
> thing was, both made a compelling case.
> 
> Robert J. Gordon, an economist, depressed everyone with a "progress is
over"
> sermon. His bottom line: The kinds of things we innovate and celebrate 
> today, like apps and thinner phones, cannot compete with previous 
> generations of innovations for their capacity to improve human living:
> the discovery of electric lights, for instance, or of refrigeration, 
> elevators, cars and washing machines. Thus, genuine progress is 
> leveling off and, with it, growth.
> 
> Erik Brynjolfsson quickly marched onstage to inform us that Mr. Gordon 
> was all wrong. The next wave of inventions will make the last waves 
> seem childish. It's a new dawn in which we can measure almost 
> anything, in which ideas can be shared for free, in which people 
> around the world can self-organize and solve problems without the help 
> of
big institutions.
> Progress! 
> 
> If you came suspecting that this technology thing was ruining the 
> world, there was much fodder for you. A technologist named Danny 
> Hillis warned that the very smart Internet was never designed to power 
> very dumb things like your light bulbs and your thermostats - and that 
> using it for more and more such things exposes us all to the risk of
catastrophic system meltdowns.
> Others argued that technology was privileging headwork over other 
> labor and would leave all but the most brilliant behind. That the new 
> corporate-built, technology-greased cities we are creating will lack 
> soul. That we're all going to be badly hacked unless we wake up. That 
> technology once seemed poised to take us all on regular moon trips, 
> and instead all we got was Facebook.
> 
> And then, just as you were about to get sad, you would hear that 3-D 
> printing is going to revolutionize the revolution, turning all of us 
> into makers. That blind people can now get shoes installed with GPS 
> and a haptic feedback system, so that their shoes can navigate them.
> That there is a new way to create credit scores 
> <http://topics.nytimes.com/your-money/credit/credit-scores/index.html?
> inline =nyt-classifier>  for the world's millions of unbanked people. 
> That robots, rather than displacing workers, will soon work alongside 
> them, turning humans into robot trainers. That paper posters can 
> somehow be turned into electronic touch screens. That someone has 
> figured out how to make cheap, Ikea-like kits for the assembly of 
> whole houses. That we're at the outset of a new solar energy
> <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/solar-
> energy /index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>  boom. That underground 
> fission will make solar seem like amateur hour.
> 
> Sometimes, the utopians at TED grow so removed from the doom crowd 
> that they propose solutions to problems that aren't really problems, 
> like how the Internet is presently confined to human beings.
> 
> "We should not restrict this network to one species," Vinton G. Cerf, 
> one of the pioneers of the Internet, said in introducing a new 
> initiative - the Interspecies Internet.
> 
> And so it went. An age of "technological unemployment" awaits, but - 
> Bono informed us - extreme poverty could soon be behind us. The music 
> business as we know it could end, but so could global health 
> pandemics. Corrupt money is strangling U.S. politics, but never fear:
> We can bypass the U.S. government, raise virtuous money and incent 
> states to make reforms with private, rather than public, cash.
> 
> What makes this time of ours so peculiar is that both of these visions 
> contain truth. It's hard to think of a comparable period in history in 
> which the rhetoric of end times so effortlessly danced with the 
> rhetoric of an intoxicating dawn. So which will it be?
> 
> Join an online conversation at http://anand.ly and follow on 
> Twitter.com/anandwrites <http://www.twitter.com/anandwrites>
> 
>  
> 
>  
> <http://up.nytimes.com/?d=0//15&t=6&s=1&ui=26421689&r=http%3a%2f%2fwww
> %2enyt
> imes%2ecom%2f2013%2f03%2f09%2fworld%2famericas%2f09iht%2dcurrents09%2e
> html%3
> fref%3dglobal%2dhome&u=www%2enytimes%2ecom%2f2013%2f03%2f09%2fworld%2f
> americ
> as%2f09iht%2dcurrents09%2ehtml%3fref%3dglobal%2dhome%26pagewanted%3dpr
> int>
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __._,_.___
> 
>  
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97476590/grpId=15209059/grpspId=170508351
> 2/msgI
> d=23040/stime=1362793489>
> 
> Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional Change settings via 
> the Web 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ottawadissenters/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJnYmpn
> bDIxBF
> 9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzE1MjA5MDU5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MzUxMgRzZWMDZnRy
> BHNsaw
> NzdG5ncwRzdGltZQMxMzYyNzkzNDg5>  (Yahoo! ID required)
> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest 
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Email%20Delive
> ry:%20
> Digest>  | Switch to Fully Featured
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Change%2
> 0Deliv
> ery%20Format:%20Fully%20Featured>
> Visit Your Group
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ottawadissenters;_ylc=X3oDMTJlY2k4aTM1B
> F9TAzk
> 3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzE1MjA5MDU5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MzUxMgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsa
> wNocGY
> Ec3RpbWUDMTM2Mjc5MzQ4OQ--> | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> | Unsubscribe 
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscri
> be>
> 
>  
> 
> __,_._,___
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to