Or will be able to successfully respond to climate change.
M From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 10:23 AM To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION Subject: Re: [Futurework] Are We Standing at the End of Times or Before an Intoxicating Dawn? In psychology, we talk about resilience - the ability to bounce back after experiencing adversity. I'm becoming increasingly convinced that resilience is what makes the difference in many cases between the successful and unsuccessful. Resilience, or something akin to it, enables some of us to see opportunities during periods of change and to take advantage of those opportunities. The lack of resilience is what causes some of us to see those periods of change as adversity. So, the question becomes who can adapt to changing circumstances the fastest/most successfully. Those will be the ones who come out on top in the long run. IMHO. Barry On Mar 9, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Keith Hudson wrote: At 03:09 09/03/2013, MG wrote: Or, and this is the fundamental flaw of the Ted-oids is it both--utopia for some and dystopia for the rest. (KH) Yes, indeed. From the very earliest significant innovation (striking a spark from flint), some people would have benefited, others would have become inadequate. (A savanna tribe with portable fire would have been able to push a predator away from its kill and thus, over time, been in better physical condition than a fire-less neighbouring tribe which, in times of severe drought, would not have survived. In later millennia, the tribe that invented the sprung spear [atlatl] was able to kill large grazing animals whereas tribes with simple thrusting spears could get nowhere near their prey. In many later millennia still, starting in early agricultural 'civilizations', successive episodes of human exploitation have occurred at different times at various levels of savagery -- large-scale human sacrifices, slave labour, feudal populations, conscripted armies, factory workers and, latterly, increasing numbers of people whose jobs are presently being robotized. Keith From: [email protected] [ mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 2:37 AM To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION' Subject: [Futurework] Are We Standing at the End of Times or Before an Intoxicating Dawn? From: [email protected] [ mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Steve Kurtz Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 8:45 PM Subject: [Ottawadissenters] Are We Standing at the End of Times or Before an Intoxicating Dawn? <http://www.nytimes.com/> The New York Times March 8, 2013 Are We Standing at the End of Times or Before an Intoxicating Dawn? By ANAND GIRIDHARADAS <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/anand_giridhar adas/index.html> LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA - This foolish, callous world of ours is en route to hell. Or this is the best the world has ever been. One of the stranger features of our time is the jousting and mingling of these two rhetorics. You hear them so often that you can forget how extreme and contradictory they are. Europe and the United States as we know them - and, ergo, civilization itself - are toast. The ecosystem is falling apart. Your texting children will grow up illiterate. China's sky will soon be rotating among 50 shades of black. The middle class? Finished. Oh, but: We live in glorious new times in which an illiterate, malnourished African child can text-message her way to democracy; upload her version of the "Harlem Shake" to YouTube on that smartphone she hopefully owns and become a viral star; and perhaps even avail of that 3-D printer in her refugee camp and finally make those toys her parents never could buy her. Each of these rhetorics must be taken with a truckload of salt. But it is true that this is simultaneously a time of real fecundity and real withering, of astonishing innovation and unbelievable breakdown, of great gains that so often fail to make ordinary lives less grinding and bleak. To spend a few days ricocheting between these rhetorics, attend the annual TED conference - it stands for technology, entertainment and design - which this year served up a heady stew of claims that the world either is going to the dogs or is awesome squared. It began, aptly enough, with a debate between two men about whether human progress was over or perhaps just getting started. The scary thing was, both made a compelling case. Robert J. Gordon, an economist, depressed everyone with a "progress is over" sermon. His bottom line: The kinds of things we innovate and celebrate today, like apps and thinner phones, cannot compete with previous generations of innovations for their capacity to improve human living: the discovery of electric lights, for instance, or of refrigeration, elevators, cars and washing machines. Thus, genuine progress is leveling off and, with it, growth. Erik Brynjolfsson quickly marched onstage to inform us that Mr. Gordon was all wrong. The next wave of inventions will make the last waves seem childish. It's a new dawn in which we can measure almost anything, in which ideas can be shared for free, in which people around the world can self-organize and solve problems without the help of big institutions. Progress! If you came suspecting that this technology thing was ruining the world, there was much fodder for you. A technologist named Danny Hillis warned that the very smart Internet was never designed to power very dumb things like your light bulbs and your thermostats - and that using it for more and more such things exposes us all to the risk of catastrophic system meltdowns. Others argued that technology was privileging headwork over other labor and would leave all but the most brilliant behind. That the new corporate-built, technology-greased cities we are creating will lack soul. That we're all going to be badly hacked unless we wake up. That technology once seemed poised to take us all on regular moon trips, and instead all we got was Facebook. And then, just as you were about to get sad, you would hear that 3-D printing is going to revolutionize the revolution, turning all of us into makers. That blind people can now get shoes installed with GPS and a haptic feedback system, so that their shoes can navigate them. That there is a new way to create credit scores <http://topics.nytimes.com/your-money/credit/credit-scores/index.html?inline =nyt-classifier> for the world's millions of unbanked people. That robots, rather than displacing workers, will soon work alongside them, turning humans into robot trainers. That paper posters can somehow be turned into electronic touch screens. That someone has figured out how to make cheap, Ikea-like kits for the assembly of whole houses. That we're at the outset of a new solar energy <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/solar-energy /index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> boom. That underground fission will make solar seem like amateur hour. Sometimes, the utopians at TED grow so removed from the doom crowd that they propose solutions to problems that aren't really problems, like how the Internet is presently confined to human beings. "We should not restrict this network to one species," Vinton G. Cerf, one of the pioneers of the Internet, said in introducing a new initiative - the Interspecies Internet. And so it went. An age of "technological unemployment" awaits, but - Bono informed us - extreme poverty could soon be behind us. The music business as we know it could end, but so could global health pandemics. Corrupt money is strangling U.S. politics, but never fear: We can bypass the U.S. government, raise virtuous money and incent states to make reforms with private, rather than public, cash. What makes this time of ours so peculiar is that both of these visions contain truth. It's hard to think of a comparable period in history in which the rhetoric of end times so effortlessly danced with the rhetoric of an intoxicating dawn. So which will it be? Join an online conversation at http://anand.ly and follow on Twitter.com/anandwrites <http://www.twitter.com/anandwrites> [] <http://up.nytimes.com/?d=0//15&t=6&s=1&ui=26421689&r=httpwwwnytimescom20130 309worldamericas09ihtcurrents09htmlrefglobalhome&u=wwwnytimescom20130309worl damericas09ihtcurrents09htmlrefglobalhomepagewantedprint> __._,_.___ Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional Change settings via the Web <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ottawadissenters/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJnYmpnbDIxBF 9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzE1MjA5MDU5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MzUxMgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsaw NzdG5ncwRzdGltZQMxMzYyNzkzNDg5> (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Email%20Delivery:%20 Digest> | Switch to Fully Featured <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Change%20Deliv ery%20Format:%20Fully%20Featured> Visit Your Group <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ottawadissenters;_ylc=X3oDMTJlY2k4aTM1BF9TAzk 3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzE1MjA5MDU5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA4MzUxMgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNocGY Ec3RpbWUDMTM2Mjc5MzQ4OQ--> | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> | Unsubscribe <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe> __,_._,___ _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
