But Sharia courts would only pertain to two parties who are both Muslim, is my understanding. Which would not bode well for Muslim women in most cases since Muslim women have few laws that protect them. The introduction of Sharia courts to Great Britain are a step backwards, not only for Muslim women and their families, but for civilized justice and national law enforcement overall.

I see your point about the rest.

Natalia

On 14/03/2013 9:53 AM, Ray Harrell wrote:

It's called the "Law of Blood" amongst the Cherokee and was the law enforced by the seven clans which ruled the nation. But that was all changed when the English insisted their way was better and shattered our culture in a grand Diaspora. As the social contract in the US breaks down around class, these ancient legal systems are arising again because our people can't get recompense from the English law. When the English thought that it was safe, they once again allowed our language and the religion to emerge, in 1978, feeling that they were not subject to either. The Sharia law that Oklahoma Anglos are afraid of is in reality the sovereignty of the Native Peoples in the old Indian Territory and the emergence of traditional legal systems. Not the Hollywood variety. The Cherokee Nation had a Supreme Court, the building still stands in Tahlequah, and Cherokee lawyers were the first "State" lawyers when the English changed "Indian Territory" to the "State" of Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Anglos are now afraid of that and Sharia is a stand in for their fear of Native Courts. That's why the Violence Against Women Act was held up in Congress. They didn't like Anglos being subject to "Sharia" (Stand in for Indian National Courts) when they raped an Indian woman as defined in the VAWA. "Oh what dark and entangled webs we weave."

REH

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *D & N
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 13, 2013 1:07 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [Futurework] Wanted for immediate placement: Swordsmen

On the surface, settlement between the two parties sounds like a workable solution which could spare many lives.

If the victimized party is pressured by community or authorities to arrive at leniency, justice may not necessarily prevail. Especially for women.

I never would have guessed that this method of settlement existed in today's Saudi Arabia, and it seems worthy of study and consideration.

Natalia

On 12/03/2013 5:17 PM, de Bivort Lawrence wrote:

    This was reported a couple of days ago in the Saudi press, eg ARAB
    NEWS. the committee referred to only found that death by firing
    squad was permissible. Neither this committee nor the Saudi
    government decide the matter: each regional government decides
    policy on this. As of a few days ago, at least one prisoner on
    "death row" had requested a firing squad.

    The discussion on this in Saudi Arabia is quite similar to that in
    the US, ranging from the death penalty itself, to  the method
    itself. Ironic, in my view, that the issue of cruelty is raised in
    the context capital punishment.

    In Saudi Arabia, unlike the US, the perpetrator and the victim (or
    the victim's family) can negotiate a voluntary settlement or
    restitution that then supersedes and voids governmental action and
    punishment. Many crimes, including murder, get resolved this way.

    Cheers,

    Lawry


    Sent from my iPhone


    On Mar 12, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Arthur Cordell <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        RIYADH, Saudi Arabia --- A Saudi newspaper says a ministerial
        committee is looking into formally dropping public beheadings
        as a method of execution in the oil-rich kingdom because it
        can't find enough swordsmen.

        Saudi Arabia is the only country in the world where a death
        sentence results in beheading in a public square.

        A government committee argues that a change to execution by
        firing squad would be fine under the laws of Islam, the Saudi
        daily newspaper al-Youm reports.

        "This solution seems practical, especially in light of
        shortages in official swordsmen or their belated arrival to
        execution yards in some incidents," the committee said in a
        statement.

        
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/03/12/lack-of-swordsmen-leads-saudi-arabia-to-consider-dropping-public-beheadings-as-method-of-execution/

        _______________________________________________
        Futurework mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework




    _______________________________________________

    Futurework mailing list

    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

    https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to