Arthur

 

There is more to this dilemma than distributing income - first it needs to
be created.  For the last couple of hundred years we have assumed that
wealth is created when people do a job for someone else, who then pays them
part of what they have created.  The worker then spends this income in what
we call the economy.  This works fine so long as everyone (or most people)
have the opportunity to do a job.  For most of the past thirty years or so
this has not been the case (or at least the jobs which have been available
have been badly degraded) as technology now means we need fewer humans to do
the sort of jobs which we needed them for a hundred years ago.

 

This doesn't mean that the amount of work which needs to be done has
decreased, just that much of this work doesn't look like the conventional
job.   What work remains to be done is, for the most part, local and
intimately connected to people's local needs (caring, restoring,
creating..).  So, if we allowed people locally to create money (as many
communities already do) this "new money" can then be distributed  - and if
appropriate there are even ways to think about guaranteed minimum incomes in
this context.

 

Charles Brass

futures foundation

www.futuresfoundation.org.au

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Wednesday, 3 April 2013 7:55 AM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] NYTimes.com: Jobs Boom Built on Cheap Energy Has
Yet to Appear

 

Politicians win elections by promising jobs, jobs, jobs.  So far the
promises seem to be working and they are in office.  Once in office they are
at a loss of what to do. (printing more and more money is likely to end
badly)

 

Jobs used to be a means to an end; now jobs are a way of distributing
income.  We need new ways to distribute income...something you, Sally, have
been working on: a guaranteed annual income.

 

Arthur

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:26 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] NYTimes.com: Jobs Boom Built on Cheap Energy Has
Yet to Appear

 

At 13:09 02/04/2013, you wrote:

How can anyone believe it will be back to business as usual? Sally 


An awful lot of people are still in denial -- financial journalists,
stockbrokers, managers of pension funds, to say the least -- they can't
afford to think of what is likely to be a very different world. In
particular, there'll be no boost from the shale gas  So far, it has only
substituted for the LNG (liquified natural gas).that America had been
importing from Qatar.  Shale gas production in America has already been
stabilized because all the existing gas-fired power stations are in use and
it will be years before enough new ones have been built. Further huge
investments will have to be made so that new petrochemical plant can arrive
at a better balance between oil and gas inputs.  Political storms are
already rising between those who want to increase shale gas production in
order to export it in LNG ships and thosee who want America to become
isolationist.

Keith 



  
Sent by [email protected]: []
[] 


Jobs Boom Built on Cheap Energy Has Yet to Appear
<http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKC2wiZPkcVUjqq3z6MI/XX&use
r_id=2fa0776a7d2e523304196dad6be5dfba&email_type=eta&task_id=136490458029311
0> 


 


By NELSON D. SCHWARTZ




Despite predictions that cheaper natural gas would generate big increases in
factory payrolls, manufacturers are increasingly automated and still have
two million fewer workers than in 2007.
Or, copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://nyti.ms/10pI7cy
<http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKC2wiZPkcVUjqq3z6MI/XX&use
r_id=2fa0776a7d2e523304196dad6be5dfba&email_type=eta&task_id=136490458029311
0> 
To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add [email protected] to your
address book. 
Advertisement 
article tools sponsored by
 
<http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=secure.ny
times.com/mem/emailthis.html&pos=Frame6A&sn2=6da5bd5a/78e3a264&sn1=880787fc/
26e1a770&camp=FSL2013_ArticleTools_336x90_1849316d_nyt5&ad=TheEast_336x90_Ja
n23&goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Ftheeast> [] 
Copyright 2013
<http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=4z5Q7LhI+KVBjmEgFdYACMlEhIhWVuPIxgan
fKahJGpDcKtdpfztygRnz23j1z6nDpx4eAAqQbYRMMl5L56EeQ==&user_id=2fa0776a7d2e523
304196dad6be5dfba&email_type=eta&task_id=1364904580293110>  | The New York
Times Company
<http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=4z5Q7LhI+KUv6vqdu/zT/DtUzLlQEcSh&use
r_id=2fa0776a7d2e523304196dad6be5dfba&email_type=eta&task_id=136490458029311
0>  | NYTimes.com 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 

 
 []
<http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=hdaNaYedr2/IomeWRKt0nffrak8aSGLbvtkk
q/r7ihwOf5XePlpJ1w==&user_id=2fa0776a7d2e523304196dad6be5dfba&email_type=eta
&task_id=1364904580293110>  
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to