The Tobin tax explained - FT.com

by Martin Sandbu • 

The “Tobin tax” was originally proposed in the early 1970s by James Tobin,
an influential American macroeconomist and recipient of the Nobel prize for
economics.

His idea was prompted by the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971,
which replaced an arrangement of fixed exchange rates ultimately based on
the US dollar’s peg to gold with a period of volatile floating exchange
rates. 

Tobin proposed to reduce this volatility with a small tax – for instance 0.1
per cent – levied on every amount exchanged from one currency into another.

He wanted to discourage short-term currency speculation, which makes it
difficult for countries to implement independent monetary policies by moving
money quickly back and forth between countries with different interest
rates.

Tobin’s goal was to “throw sand in the wheels” of global finance with a
simple tax that would be small enough to make short-term purely financial
movements uneconomical – without being a burden on trade.

The proposal never caught on in the 1970s but received renewed attention
during the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s when it became a cause
celèbre for the anti-globalisation movement. A number of organisations, such
as France-based Attac, sprang up to campaign for a Tobin tax long after the
economist had died in 2002.

Today the Tobin tax is back in vogue, with the European Commission, France
and Germany all pushing for a broad financial transactions tax. They argue
that it will make the financial industry pay a fairer share of the burden
brought on by the financial crisis as well as compensate governments for
their rescue of the industry. Some also argue that the tax can reduce what
they see as harmful high-frequency trading.

The original purpose of putting the brakes on currency speculation has been
somewhat eclipsed among activists who have increasingly seen the Tobin tax
as a good way of raising revenue for economic and social development. 

Tobin himself disowned activists’ adoption of his proposal for
revenue-raising purposes, which he thought missed the point of the proposal:
to reduce the socially harmful effects of finance while keeping its
benefits.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 8:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] Re: Tobin Tax is madness for Europe


Keith wrote:

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/9985
> 673/Tobin-Tax-is-madness-for-Europe-and-economic-war-against-Britain.h
> tml

>From the article:

    One French banker told Les Echos that the Tobin Tax was 'a weapon
    of mass destruction that is going to ruin our financial sector'.

Once again confessing my ignorance of financial operations, it nevertheless
seems to me that these guys are saying, "Our whole casino finance system
depends on minute by minute arbitrage moving vast sums from one notional
asset to another.  Of *course* it has nothing to do with the real world,
'Main Street' or ordinary people but it's how we get rich.  It's *our*
bubble, OURS, !!OURS!! and you can't be allowed to interfere! Certainly not
for some archaic and outmoded reason like 'the common good' or 'national
interest'."

It has amused me to note that the Globe & Mail's financial section uses
unabashed casino terms -- bets, in play -- in its front pages that carry
news for Bay Street suits but switches over to homely, thoughtful
terminology in the middle pages where "middle class" folks, those in the
lower reaches of Keith's 20% with money to invest, may be looking for
reasonable arguments for or against this weeks fashion for or against mutual
funds, gold, bonds, foreign securities, pension funds etc. etc.

Assuming, once again, the mantle of "fiction guy", here's a quote from Bruce
Sterling's "The Littlest Jackal" (1996).  The speaker is a lower-echelon
functionary of the Russian mafia:

    "We're past the Marxist thing," said Kohklov, warming to his
    theme.... "Now it's different.  This time, Russia has a kind of
    craziness that is truly big enough and bad enough to take over the
    whole world.  Massive, total, institutional corruption.  Top to
    bottom.  Nothing held back. A new kind of absolute corruption that
    will sell *anything*: the flesh of our women, the future of our
    children.  Everything inside our museums and our churches.
    Anything goes for money: gold, oil, arms, dope, nukes. We'll sell
    the forests and the Russian sky. We'll sell our souls."

Are we "past the Capitalist thing" in the USA?  Does Canada's PM Harper have
a burning desire for Canada to get "past the Capitalist thing" so's not to
fall behind his southern neighbors in "absolute corruption"?

Thirty-five years ago, a friend loaned me a few thousand bucks to buy and
refurbish a new studio.  She could have asked (but didn't) to have me set up
as a corporation and held equity.  (The latter would have been a bad choice
because one of the two large commissions that justified buying the studio
fell through due to the client's health.) I repaid the loan on schedule.
But either way, that's what I think of as "capitalism".

The daily swapping around of notional money in quantities an order of
magnitude or more greater than the global GNP [1] isn't capitalism.
The effect of such swapping is, as far as I can see, (see "ignorance",
supra) intrinsically bubble-producing.  That's what it's all about.
So unless the governments that putatively represent "real people" are, as in
the Sterling frame, entrained in "a new kind of absolute corruption", it's
high time that a little anti-foaming agent should be applied in the form of
a tax on financial transactions.


- Mike

[1] I can't find the figures off hand.  But isn't that about right for
    the size of money-trading market?

-- 
Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 
                                                           /V\ 
[email protected]                                     /( )\
http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/                        ^^-^^

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to