At 05:16 29/04/2013, Ray Harrell wrote:
Maybe the WSJ and Krugman are collaborating?
REH

Maybe Krugnan is up to his old rhetorical tricks. As usual, he raises a topic very early on without giving evidence. Then he leaves it largely alone until right at the end of his piece where he returns to the topic as though his view on it had thus been proved. The Greeks had a term for this type of invalid argument.

In this case Krugman talks of austerity in his first paragraph and mentions academic studies as though they had been found invalid by subsequent academic studies. Because he doesn't actually say this specifically the reader is inclined not to pick fault with it. However, when he talks of austerity in his last paragraph it's as though austerity has actually been disproved in some academic paper or other, not to speak of the body of the essay he has just written.

Yes, of course, there's a powerful tide against austerity by electorates which have been feather-bedded until recently (e.g. Greece, Portugal, Italy) and also by governments which are too frightened to try it (e.g. France, Belgium). Nevertheless, those countries which have tried it and succeeded (e.g. West Gernany 'swallowing' a bankrupt East Germany 20 years ago) or are in the process of succeeding today (e.g. Iceland, Iceland) can only confirm that austerity is essential.

Keith
the many academic papers which have said that



<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/29/opinion/krugman-the-story-of-our-time.html?hp>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/29/opinion/krugman-the-story-of-our-time.html?hp


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 10:59 AM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: [Futurework] Capitalism is killing our morals, our future - MarketWatch



From: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Kurtz
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 6:48 AM
Subject: [Ottawadissenters] Capitalism is killing our morals, our future - MarketWatch



The nanny state went too far in the other direction, but he is correct about much here in my opinion.
Steve



excerpts:
Unfortunately, we never had that debate during the 30-year rise of “market triumphalism. As a result, without quite realizing it ­ without ever deciding to do so ­ we drifted from having a market economy to being a market society.” And “the difference is this: A market economy is a tool ... for organizing productive activity. A market society is a way of life in which market values seep into every aspect of human endeavor. It’s a place where social relations are made over in the image of the market.” The difference is profound.


The good professor is a great teacher, with only one glaring flaw in his logic: he’s too idealistic, too quixotic. You don’t have to be a fatalist to know that without a total economic collapse, market capitalists ­ including 1,426 billionaires, Wall Street bankers, hedgers, lobbyists and every other special interest getting rich off the new market society ­ will never voluntarily surrender their control over the American political system. Rather, they will blindly continue down their self-destructive path with an absolute conviction they are divinely guided by the Invisible Hand of Adam Smith, and perhaps even God. Meanwhile, we have no choice but wait patiently till the collapse, anxiously aware that our bizarre political system will just keep degrading America’s moral values, pricing, buying, selling, trading morals like commodities, because in the final analysis everything has a price and everyone has a price in our hot new exciting Market Society.


<http://www.marketwatch.com/Story/story/print?guid=01AA1916-AEA6-11E2-BA04-002128040CF6>http://www.marketwatch.com/Story/story/print?guid=01AA1916-AEA6-11E2-BA04-002128040CF6



__._,_.___
__,_._,___
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to