From: Portside moderator [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 4:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [SPAM] NYT Story Just an Excuse to Bash Welfare State

 


 <http://portside.org>  <http://portside.org/>  <http://portside.org> 


 



 


 <http://portside.org/2013-05-08/nyt-story-just-excuse-bash-welfare-state> NYT 
Story Just an Excuse to Bash Welfare State 


 


May 8, 2013
Remapping Debate 
<http://www.remappingdebate.org/article/nyt-story-just-excuse-bash-welfare-state?page=0,0>
 

 

Not only is this narrative mistaken, but by indulging in it, we are missing a 
huge opportunity to learn the lessons that Denmark might offer us

 


 

  <http://portside.org/sites/default/files/field/image/1195p.jpg> 

, Better Youth Org 
<http://www.allmusic.com/album/greetings-from-the-welfare-state-mw0000254618> , 

 


 

May 7, 2013 — In the summer of 2011, I travelled to Denmark, where my reporting 
resulted in a series of articles 
<http://www.remappingdebate.org/article/consider-adapting-danish-policy-choices-us-centrists-and-conservatives-say-yes>
  about the Danish welfare state and political system. Like most American 
visitors, I was struck by the high level of social solidarity and broad support 
for the country’s free education and health care systems, robust safety net, 
and, yes — high taxes. I spoke with business leaders 
<http://www.remappingdebate.org/article/business-interests-lauding-welfare-state>
 ; I spoke with conservative politicians 
<http://www.remappingdebate.org/photo-essay/postcards-copenhagen> . Nobody 
seemed to think that it would be a good idea to abandon the Danish model for a 
U.S.-style system.

So I was surprised to read recently — in a front-page New York Times article 
called “Danes Rethink a Welfare State Ample to a Fault 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/21/world/europe/danes-rethink-a-welfare-state-ample-to-a-fault.html?smid=pl-share>
 ,” by Suzanne Daley — that the Danish welfare state is slated for the 
scrapheap.

The Times article focused on a media frenzy in Denmark that erupted from a 
right-wing politician’s visit to a single mother named Carina who had been 
living on social assistance since she was 16 and received about $2,700 a month:

In past years, Danes might have shrugged off the case, finding Carina more 
pitiable than anything else. But even before her story was in the headlines 16 
months ago, they were deeply engaged in a debate about whether their beloved 
welfare state, perhaps Europe’s most generous, had become too rich, undermining 
the country’s work ethic. Carina helped tip the scales.

That Danes had concluded that their “beloved welfare state” has become “too 
rich” would certainly be big news, so I decided to check in with some of my 
Danish contacts. Most of them agreed that it had elements of a gripping story; 
the only problem, they said, is that it isn’t true.

Rumors of the death of the Danish welfare state have been greatly exaggerated.

“I can assure you, the Danish welfare state is alive and well, it has wide 
public support, and it isn’t going anywhere,” said Ove Kaj Pedersen, a 
professor at the Copenhagen Business School. “Every so often you will see a 
story like this about how it is collapsing. Usually they are based on a kind of 
cartoon version of the welfare state in Denmark.”

That isn’t to say that there haven’t been some legislative changes since the 
financial crisis, and that some of them haven’t been significant. In 2011, the 
duration for which Danes are eligible to receive unemployment benefits was 
lowered to two years from four years — it remains the longest period in the 
world — and an agreement was made to raise the retirement age in 2027 to 67, 
and index it thereafter to life expectancy (this is perhaps the most 
significant reform and is discussed further in our Story Repair 
<http://www.remappingdebate.org/node/1914> ).

More recently, the current government reduced the length of time that Danes can 
receive a “student allowance” — a monthly living stipend given to all higher 
education students in Denmark — from six years to five years. They also reduced 
the social assistance benefit for Danes under 30 without a college degree to 
the level of the student allowance, in an effort to incentivize recipients to 
get a degree.

But according to Kaj Pedersen and several other experts inside and outside of 
Denmark, those reforms do not herald the end of the welfare state, nor do they 
represent a departure from the country’s social democratic model.

As I show in more detail in my Story Repair of the New York Times article, the 
reforms are actually completely consistent with the Danish welfare state model, 
in which the government plays a large role in making sure that people are 
educated and working in high-skill jobs.

“The driving idea behind all of these reforms is to get people educated and 
working in high-skill, high-wage jobs as quickly as possible,” said Lisbeth 
Pedersen, an economist at the Danish National Centre for Social Research. “The 
Danish model has always been about providing a generous level of social 
support, but also making sure that people are working in good jobs and paying 
taxes to sustain it.”

“The Danish model has always been about providing a generous level of social 
support, but also making sure that people are working in good jobs and paying 
taxes to sustain it.”
— Lisbeth Pedersen,
Danish National Centre for Social Research

To support the apparently predetermined narrative of the welfare state’s 
decline, the Times reporter had to resort to several gross distortions and 
outright falsehoods.

First, the article implied that Denmark is facing serious demographic 
challenges that make the current level of benefits unsustainable. “Denmark’s 
long-term outlook is troubling,” we are told, and “few experts here believe 
that Denmark can long afford the current perks.”

None of these “experts” were identified, however, which is probably because 
they are very difficult to find. The experts with whom I spoke all refuted 
these assertions on the basis of two primary facts.

The first is that Denmark has low government deficits and a remarkably low 
level of government debt 
<http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=k3s92bru78li6_#!ctype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=ggxwdn_ngdp&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=world&idim=world:Earth&idim=country:DK:US&ifdim=world&hl=en_US&dl=en_US&ind=false>
 , making the “unsustainability” argument hard to pull off. The second is that 
Denmark has an extremely robust private pension system that is the product of 
decades of collective bargaining agreements by trade unions.

“It would be easy to argue that Denmark is actually the country that is the 
best prepared for the coming demographic changes,” said Lars Andersen, the 
director of the Economic Council of the Labour Movement, a union-affiliated 
think tank in Copenhagen.

The Times article then proceeded to argue that the problem in Denmark is that, 
because so many people are on welfare, there are not enough people working to 
sustain the welfare state. While it’s true that the aim of many of the recent 
reforms is to get as many people as possible into the workforce, there is also 
broad agreement that Denmark does not face any crisis on account of the 
proportion of people who are not working.

“I can assure you, the Danish welfare state is alive and well, it has wide 
public support, and it isn’t going anywhere.” — Ove Kaj Pedersen, Copenhagen 
Business School

According to Dean Baker, economist and the co-director of the Center for 
Economic and Policy Research, a think tank in Washington, D.C., Denmark 
actually has one of the highest employment-to-population ratios in the world 
<http://www.oecd.org/std/labour-stats/QES_NR10e12.pdf> , significantly higher 
than that of the United States.

However, we are told, comparisons to other countries “are misleading, since 
many Danes work short hours and enjoy perks like long vacations and lengthy 
paid maternity leaves, not to mention a de facto minimum wage approaching $20 
an hour.”

But, according to Baker and other economists, the fact that Danes work shorter 
hours is simply a reflection of a choice they have made to take more of their 
compensation in leisure time than in wages. “There’s nothing scary about that,” 
Baker said. “In the U.S. we have higher incomes and in Denmark they have longer 
vacations. That doesn’t have any bearing on the sustainability of the welfare 
state.”

Finally, the article implies that a new consensus has emerged in Denmark about 
the unsustainability of the welfare state. In fact, even the modest recent 
changes to the social assistance and student allowance systems have produced a 
significant backlash. The two main governing parties — the Social Democrats and 
the Socialist People’s Party — have seen a dramatic 20-point drop 
<http://www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/meningsmaalinger>  in the polls, while the 
two parties that have staked out positions against the cuts have seen a 
10-point spike.

All of those facts put quite a dent in the Time’s big story. According to Kaj 
Pedersen of the Copenhagen Business School, the temptation to imagine the 
decline of the welfare state reflects a general discomfort with the idea that 
an economy can simultaneously be competitive and provide high levels of 
economic security and low levels of inequality. “It defies American logic,” he 
said.

Not only is this narrative mistaken, but by indulging in it, we are missing a 
huge opportunity to learn the lessons that Denmark might offer us.

 


 


 <http://portside.org/2013-05-08/nyt-story-just-excuse-bash-welfare-state> VIEW 
ONLINE
 <http://portside.org/print/node/2565> PRINT
 <http://portside.org/subscribe> SUBSCRIBE
 <http://portside.org> VISIT PORTSIDE.ORG
 <https://twitter.com/portsideorg> TWITTER
 <https://facebook.com/Portside.PortsideLabor> FACEBOOK 

 


 


 



Portside aims to provide material of interest to people on the left that will 
help them to interpret the world and to change it.

 

 <http://portside.org/submit> Submit via web

 <mailto:[email protected]> Submit via email

 <http://portside.org/faq> Frequently asked questions

 <http://portside.org/subscribe> Manage subscription

 <http://portside.org/archive> Search Portside archives

 

 

 

                

 

!DSPAM:2676,518af161201482869319321! 

To unsubscribe, click here 
<http://lists.portside.org/cgi-bin/listserv/wa?TICKET=NzM1MDI2IG1ndXJzdEBWQ04uQkMuQ0EgUE9SVFNJREUgIDuBXqUvrtT4&c=SIGNOFF>
 . 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to