If it was me you were referring to I apologize for not cutting previous
posts from my posting.   Some like it some don't.   I would also note that
those of us with different programs all spend considerable time trying to
format what we send so that they are visually coherent.   I often send out
things that come back with sentences of all lengths and difficult to follow
(and I posted it and deliberately set the line lengths so that they were
easy to read).   But I tried.   The recent post was six pages of writing
which is about what I post all the time.   So I didn't think Lord Russell
was overly long.   It's hard to be simple in a language that has problems
with position, relationship and relativity and reduces everything to stones
rather than action. 

REH

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 8:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] [META] Mail netiquette is a SOCIOLIST!


Posting a few lines of new text along with 1500 lines/100K of quoted text
from previous posts been recognized as poor netiquette for two decades.
Good netiquette is to use your mail client to edit the quoted text down to
the lines or paragraphs to which your current comments apply or respond. [1]

       Da ich keine Zeit habe, Dir einen kurzen Brief zu schreiben,
       schreibe ich Dir einen langen.   -- Goethe

Not to mention the annoyance of posts that include 100+ K of trivial images
and PR bumpf from a cited web page and the choice of software options that
duplicate everything you post in alternative formats -- typically 7 bit
ASCII text and HTML -- with everything base64 encoded.


Well, I realize that I'm an old-school crank. [2] Now everybody just clicks
one virtual button or another, whacks out a few lines and hits send without
any clue to what's really being sent.  But I'm getting tired of decoding or
reformatting nearly every FW post and then editing out the superfluous 70%
to 90%.


- Mike


[1] This is unlike business or highly technical email in which having
    full prior text of a (possibly lengthy) exchange in every message
    is insurance against introducing errors into the business or
    technology process.


[2] Isn't it curious that there can be an "old school" with regard to
    anything mediated by the internet?

-- 
Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 
                                                           /V\ 
[email protected]                                     /( )\
http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/                        ^^-^^

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to