Ray Evans Harrell

After that it would help if Congress and the various parliaments would grow up as well.  I've never seen such silly gamesmanship as the English and Canadian soap operas that they call governmental debate.  

To which I say a loud "Amen!" 

So Ed, I certainly would never mistake you for an unreasonable fellow, like myself, who couldn't work within the government, again like myself, although I mistrust your mistrust of creative action.   Like Poe's Tar and Feathere I think there is a need for regularly turning everything upside down just to gain a little objectivity.   We call it contrary action.    To clean house while maintaining balance and stability for the young and the very old.   Everyone else is another matter entirely.

When I started working for the government as a fresh college graduate a very long time ago now, I had several job offers from the private sector.  I chose government out of misplaced idealism and the misconception (perhaps) that this is where the most important social decisions were being made.  As a public servant, I moved around a lot, always looking for a place in which I could do some good.  This got me something of a reputation as a malcontent and non-player, perhaps demonstrating that I too was not really suitable for working within government.  However, when I look back at it now, I must admit I had a very interesting and rewarding career, and thoroughly enjoyed it.

I also worked for a large corporation for a couple of years, and felt that that environment was more inhibiting and restricting than most of the things I did with government.

I have no objection to cleaning house, but I'd suggest that one has have one hell of good idea of what the objectives of doing so are, and that one can indeed maintain balance and stability, before one does it.

 
Ed Weick
(613) 728-4630 Visit my website: http://members.eisa.com/~ec086636

Reply via email to