|
The traditional defence of capitalism is that because of
competition [for the purchasing power of the consumer] good products are
produced at the lowest possible price.
However, that seems to no longer be the meaning of
competition, as witness these excerpts from a business story in the Toronto Star
on December 19, 2000:
"Aetna Inc. said yesterday it plans to cut 5,000 jobs or 13
per cent of its work force ... as the number 1 US health insurer looks to cut
costs and boost profits.
"Aetna also said it would apply big price hikes on health
plans renewing Jan. 1, 2001, to improve profitability.
"The moves are part of a drive to restore 'Aetna as a major
competitive force with industry-leading financial performance and a heightened
ability to serve our customers effectively,' Aetna president and chief executive
John Rowe said in a statement."
This is by no means the first time that I have seen this usage
of "competitiveness" to mean high profitability, a meaning that is pretty much
diametrically opposed to the classical meaning of low consumer prices. It is
also far from clear how staff cuts are going to result in "heightened ability to
serve customers effectively.
|
- Re: capitalist doublespeak Victor Milne
- Re: capitalist doublespeak Mike Spencer
- Re: capitalist doublespeak Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
