Harry Pollard:
 
> My job - among others - is to continue to ask the question posed by Henry
> George in Progress and Poverty, which is 'why, in spite of enormous
> increases in productivity, is it so hard to make a living?'
 
Perhaps, Harry, it's because productivity is not the only thing that bears on making a living.  I'm not sure of how productivity is measured now, but some time ago one way it was measured was output per person hour.  The hour, of course,was the hour spent at work, and did not include time required to commute to and from work, time required to put the kids in daycare and pick them up, and time to do all of those other things that families with the now usual two earners must do as part of the modern labour force.  As well, consider the time people spend in off-the-job networking just to maintain their place in a profession or on a hierarchy.  And think of the time many people have to spend in order to find a job so that they can make a living, or moving among their two or three jobs once they've found them.  If the hours required to do all of these off-the-job things were factored in, you can bet that productivity would fall significantly. 
 
There is a question of whether, as workers, we are moving forward, standing still, or retreating.  In some important respects, it would seem that we are doing the latter.  Not only has work become more stressful, of-the-job stress also seems to be rising.  There is an article on this in this morning's Globe & Mail.  I reproduce it below.
 
Ed Weick

Work-life stresses mount for Canadians
space
space
By ELIZABETH CHURCH
  
  
 
Email this articlePrint this article
Tuesday, October 23, 2001 – Print Edition, Page B6

A national study to be released today shows that Canadians are finding it increasingly difficult to cope with the often conflicting demands of their personal and professional lives.

That may sound like old news in an era when juggling birthday parties and corporate deadlines is the norm. But the research shows things have seriously deteriorated for Canadian workers over the past decade, leaving them more stressed, more depressed and less satisfied with their jobs.

It also shows that while women with children still feel the greatest pressure when it comes to balancing the demands of work and home, all workers increasingly are facing the problem -- men and women, young and old.

"This is definitely not good news," said Linda Duxbury, the Carleton University professor who conducted the research with Chris Higgins from the University of Western Ontario.

"We know that the nineties were hard," she said. "What this research shows is that there is no group that escaped the decade unscathed."

That comes as no surprise to Karin Morris of Calgary, a supervisor in a information technology department with two children, 7 and 4.

Keeping up with work and home takes constant planning, she said. Backpacks have to be checked for homework, lunches packed, laundry done.

"I am always pressed for time," said Ms. Morris, who works for a local public-sector organization. "Sometimes I wish I could do more."

The research, based on responses from more than 6,000 workers, mirrors similar work done by the two professors in 1991.

Taken together, Ms. Duxbury said, the studies provide a compelling business case for employers to take action.

"This balance thing is part of a much bigger picture," she said. "Corporations need to stay competitive. It is hard to be competitive if you have a stressed-out work force."

The study, "Work-Life Balance in the New Millennium: Where are We? Where Do We Need to Go?," is sponsored by the Canadian Policy Research Networks and is the first in a series of reports by the two researchers.

Among the report's findings:

Fifty-five per cent of the workers surveyed reported high levels of stress, up from 47 per cent in 1991.

Thirty-eight per cent had a highly depressed mood, compared with 33 per cent in 1991. Forty per cent were highly satisfied with their life, down from 42 per cent.

The amount of time people spent at the office each week rose to a mean of 43 hours from under 41. Still, the people taking work home jumped to 52 per cent from 31 per cent.

Forty-five per cent of the sample said they were highly satisfied with their jobs, down from 62 per cent, and half said they where highly committed to their organization, down from 66 per cent.

All workers at all levels reported an increase in conflict between work and family compared with 10 years ago, although professional men and women are less depressed about this outcome.

Ms. Duxbury said this could be a result of the greater flexibility they have in their jobs.

As well, the study points to a looming issue -- elder care -- that Ms. Duxbury predicts has the potential to be problematic for workers and employers.

In this year's survey, one-quarter of respondents reported elder care responsibilities, a huge jump from 6 per cent a decade ago.

This percentage is set to climb as the parents of the baby-boom generation age, Ms. Duxbury said, and it will have huge implications for employers.

On the positive side, the report finds that an understanding boss can go a long way in reducing stress and increasing loyalty and job satisfaction for workers.



 

Reply via email to