I'll preface my remarks on airline industry bailouts with the disclosure of
interest as an airline industry consultant.

Both direct subsidies to airlines and indirect subsidies in the form of
vouchers for customers beg the question of whether air transportation is
enviromentally and socially something we want to encourage. The technology
of air transportation did not evolve guided by the invisible hands of
sovereign consumer demand and private investor self interest. It blossomed
in the hothouse of war. The same can be said for the computer. Private
industry developed as offshoot of the military research and development.

Traditionally the airlines have also recruited pilots who received their
initial training in the military. One needs to learn to think in terms of
the "military-industrial complex" as more or less seamlessly phasing into
the civilian economy. A 747 is not a B-52, but the former can only exist as
the product of an technological industrial order that has first developed
the capability of producing the latter. The palm pilot is an offshot of
anti-aircraft ballistics guidance systems and the internet is the son of
ARPAnet.  

Perhaps there is a sense in which war is 'bred in the bone' of much of
advanced technology. Perhaps that is one terrible lesson we can learn from
the use of civilian airliners as weapons of mass destruction. Beating our
swords into ploughshares may be both more urgent and more complicated than
we imagine.

Tom Walker
Bowen Island, BC
604 947 2213

Reply via email to