Keith,

You know the right questions!

If this is a bit too labored, I apologize. It's not that you need great 
care to understand, but rather I'm not competent enough to dance through 
the ideas. I have to plod.

However, tuck these basics under your belt and already the economic world 
will look different. I hope you enjoy this. Of course you'll have 
questions. That's what E-Mail is all about. Let me know what you think.

You ask how I treat the basic concepts. First, I'll give you the classical 
terms - then I'll show how I've amended them.

As you are aware, the name doesn't matter. The defined concept it is 
attached to does matter. Names should perhaps be sensible but, if you wish, 
a defined concept can be called Rumpelstiltskin. The label is less 
important than the concept.

You will find, not only on this list, but everywhere else, torrid battles 
taking place over a word to which each side ascribes a different meaning. 
They can never agree because they are talking around a word that means 
different things.

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, "it means just what I choose it to 
mean-neither more nor less."

"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many
different things."

"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master, that's all."

That was logician and mathematician Charles Dodgson in "Through the Looking 
Glass"

If we wish to think scientifically we must early go through a process of 
defining concepts. We develop a concept in our minds, but it can be pretty 
wooly. The immediate task is to define our concept, which means putting a 
fence around it. Inside the fence is nothing but the concept. Outside the 
fence, there is no part of the concept. Defining is, pretty obviously, the 
hard part of the operation.

This is how the 19th century economists and particularly Henry George went 
about creating a common language.

Using their imaginations, they removed Man and his works from the planet. 
What was left they called "Natural Resources" - and later, LAND. So, the 
oceans, air, sunshine, the electromagnetic spectrum are all natural 
resources and are therefore LAND. The Pacific is LAND as it is a natural 
resource.

Then, the ancients put people back on earth. They called people LABOR. The 
subject of a study should always be a separate class. Thus, if we were 
studying bears, no doubt the first job would be to set out just what is a 
bear - then relate other things to this defined concept.

So, we now have two mutually exclusive defined concepts, LAND and LABOR.

Once Labor is back on earth he has to survive, so he puts his exertion to 
work to produce food, clothing, and shelter. These material products of his 
exertion (both physical and mental) are in neither of our first two 
classes. So, they were given another name - WEALTH.

You walk through the forest and you see an apple tree. From the apple tree 
(Land), you (Labor) pick an apple (Wealth).

We now have three mutually exclusive defined products: LAND, LABOR, and 
WEALTH. This is all you need when Labor produces things for himself - where 
he is  both producer and consumer.

Political Economy doesn't concern itself with family production. If you 
produce your food and other things in your own home and garden, you are not 
part of the study. Doesn't mean that intra-family relationships aren't 
important. They are simply part of another science.

The study of Political Economy begins with the first exchange outside the 
family, when producer and consumer are different people.

Products on their way to market increase in value. The table worth $10 in 
your workshop may be worth $20 at the market. That's why you take it there. 
Trade is a Wealth producer. Your material product on its way to market is 
still being produced and will continue in production until it reaches the 
consumer, whereupon it will be used, or consumed.

Goods in production will increase in value, goods in the hands of the 
consumer will diminish in value.

So again, we have two defined concepts. As well as those in the course of 
exchange, products in the production process as tools, or partly produced 
goods,  or goods stored waiting for the best time to sell - all are 
material products that are part of the production process. Such products 
have not reached the consumer and are given the name CAPITAL.

When they reach the consumer production is finished and are then WEALTH.

So, there they are - Land, Labor, Capital, and Wealth - the four terms with 
which everything in the universe - and more practically, everything on 
earth can be described.

Whatever it may be, you will find it in only one of these four terms: Land, 
Labor, Capital, and Wealth. The first three were called the Factors of 
Production. Modern economists often give lip-service to them - but they are 
hardly rigorous in their treatment.

I don't use these terms quite as they were originally presented. I look at 
them this way. I take the most important characteristic of each of the 
Factors of Production and use it. You know the old real estate maxim: "The 
three most important things about land are location, location, location."

The most important characteristic about land is indeed location, but with 
an address, so that is what I use. It should be noted that you can produce 
nothing on Natural Resources. You produce on a "location with an 
address".  You grow wheat on the "North 40". You drill for oil in Long 
Beach Harbor. You build a house on the north-east corner of Cross and High 
St. - and so on. You never build on Land - you always build on a "location 
with an address" which is the defined concept to which I attach the term LAND.

The major characteristic of Labor is exertion. Exertion is your manifest 
connection to the outside world. Everything that is Keith Hudson will show 
up in the way he exerts - including things one doesn't think of as 
economics. How you love and hate,  whether you are happy or miserable, 
whether you are intelligent or not - everything that is you is mirrored in 
what you do.

If I could write with the elegance and flair of Ray, I might suggest that 
the way you exert is a window into your soul. I'll just say: "Don't believe 
what people say, believe what they do." So, when I use LABOR it stands for 
the defined concept of human exertion.

Finally, we come to CAPITAL. Capital introduces the concept of time - the 
final part of the production equation.

You have built a yacht. As you watch the last coat of varnish dry, up comes 
your friend Ted. "Hey!" he says. "That's just what I want for our trip to 
the Mediterranean. Could I borrow it for a month."

You say: "Are you crazy? I just spent a year building it. Now, I want to 
enjoy it."

I'll cut it short. After negotiation, you agree to let him have the boat - 
if he takes out insurance against wear and loss and pays you 200 pounds a day.

Now, the Wealth you intended to produce has become Capital and is producing 
200  pounds a day and will do so for as long as it remains Capital. So, 
what is the prime characteristic of Capital?

It is Time.

So, in my variation of the basic Factors of Production, we have 'A location 
with an address' - 'Human exertion' - and 'Time', BUT I still call them 
Land, Labor, and Capital.

How would Henry George feel about my desecration of his Truth?

Well, he adjured his readers to "Think for yourself" "In nothing trust in me."

I don't think he would have cared. Of course, he would have argued!

Harry

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Keith wrote:

>Hi Harry,
>
>The paragraph you wrote in reply to Ray:
>
><<<<
>You have to observe - and hope you won't mess up the observation by being
>part of it. Over generations, the classical thinkers found their basic
>concepts and stuck labels on them. Henry George's great advance was not
>land-value taxation, but his fine tuning of the basic concepts to make them
>mutually exclusive.
> >>>>
>
>reminds me that I am very interested to know how you define Henry George's
>basic concepts (Land, Labour, Capital and Wealth) in mutually exclusive terms.
>
>Keith
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>
>Keith Hudson, General Editor, Calus <http://www.calus.org>
>6 Upper Camden Place, Bath BA1 5HX, England
>Tel: +44 1225 312622;  Fax: +44 1225 447727;
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>________________________________________________________________________


******************************
Harry Pollard
Henry George School of LA
Box 655
Tujunga  CA  91042
Tel: (818) 352-4141
Fax: (818) 353-2242
*******************************


Reply via email to