At 09:48 17/10/01 -0400, Ed Weick wrote:

(EW)
>>>>
I thought I would post the following "more bad news" article from this
morning's Globe and Mail business section.  While the article mentions that
the American economy was in decline before the events of September 11th,
what happened that day and the consequent nervousness of American
consumers, producers and investors appears to have been quite significant
in its effects.
>>>>

I agree. As far as I'm aware, Wall Street (and London Stock Market) share
prices have largely recovered from the effects of the airstrikes of 11
September -- apart from the more serious effects on (already weak)
airlines, hotels and the tourist industry generally which will undoubtedly
last longer. I even read an article in which a journalist described the
event as 'trivial' in economic terms. (Strictly speaking, that may be so,
but it was a most unfortunate use of the word in that context, and I hope
someone slapped him [and his editor] very hard for letting that slip through.)

But strange consequences have followed -- such as the one which suddenly
affected my music publishing business. Normally, 70% of my sales go to
American choirs (roughly 50:50 as between church and secular choirs) and
30% to the rest of the world. Since 11 September, my Internet sales have
halved and American sales are now only 30% of total sales. I can only think
that the shock has been so considerable that it has affected almost
everything that Americans would normally be doing and thinking at the
present time.

And, as Ed writes . . .
<<<<   
A front page article in the G&M deals with how irrational Americans (and,
I'm sure, others) have become since September 11th, buying gas masks,
antibiotics, and rubber gloves to make themselves feel they have some
control over their personal situations, when the reality is that such
actions make no difference whatsoever.  What this suggests is that the more
uncertain a situation is, the less rational the response becomes.  It also
suggests that when, in times of uncertain outcomes, people lose control
over events that affect their lives, they will do everything they can to
develop and maintain an illusion of control.  IMHO, we can expect consumers
to sit tight for quite some time, gas masks, antibiotics and rubber gloves
at hand, and not want to spend money on things not needed for day to day
survival.  Given the large and growing uncertainty abroad in the US, and
the factors feeding this uncertainty, it may be a long time before there is
an economic recovery unless of course there is a major stimulus from the
defence and security sectors.
>>>>

. . . the anthrax outbreak (30-odd people have now tested positive
according to the radio news I heard a few minutes ago) will have, if
anything, even greater and more widespread effects.  And all this is to be
laid upon on the stock markets in which, even after declining for 18 months
past, shares prices are still wildly overpriced. 

This has been laid on with a trowel in today's Financial Times. The front
page headline reads "George predicts 3-year downturn". (George is Sir
Edward George, the Governor of the Bank of England.) I can't recall such a
blunt statement from the Bank of England before.  Indeed, in normal times
he would have been publicly disciplined by the Prime Minister for speaking
out like this. Inside the FT, one of the main articles by Martin Wolf,
normally a fairly restrained financial journalist, has statements such as:
"The conclusion [is] that the market has been -- and still is -- hugely
expensive . . ".

His conclusion is based upon the fact that the price/earnings ratio of
shares over the long term has always been about 14 (that is, with a real
return of about 7%), whereas yesterday the average p/e was about 23 (having
been 33 in April 2000). Thus, there's a long way to go yet -- even if
shares don't undershoot 14 -- before shares stabilise. It's my view (from
random reading of company reports in recent months) that this will be a
supplier-led recession after many years of business complacency, so that no
matter how much money Bush or George pump into their respective economies
in order to stimulate consumer spending, the recession will continue
willy-nilly. (And once again, as mentioned in my previous posting this
morning, all this monetary pump-priming will affect the value of money and
other things in unmeasurable ways which will take years to work their way
through to unknown consequences.)

Ed wrote above: "[people] will do everything they can to develop and
maintain an illusion of control" in such times. Yes, indeed. I'll make one
guess, based on what I've read about the Great Depression of the 30s. This
is that a great variety of weird religious and psychic sects will blossom
in the next few years consisting of anxious people looking for certainty in
a world in which the "authorities" appear to be unable to control.

Keith Hudson 

___________________________________________________________________

Keith Hudson, General Editor, Calus <http://www.calus.org>
6 Upper Camden Place, Bath BA1 5HX, England
Tel: +44 1225 312622;  Fax: +44 1225 447727; 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to