I would agree.   And a happy birthday to you and Sally, Arthur.    I too
pledge my loyalty to this list.

There is one question I would put to the last two posts.    How do you
distinguish between leaders and leadership?   Is not that the quality of
those being led?      In the Arts we have a kind of patronage called
"Strategic Giving."    It basically means this:  How little can you
contribute while still getting what you want?     If you can stimulate other
giving by giving little then you are determined a "winner" in the strategy
of giving.   Considering that I exist in a Judeo-Christian-Muslim culture as
an artist and pagan (follower of the natural world) I find myself,
especially in this holiday, at odds with the rest of the society.   In my
society it is not the person who saves the most that is the most honored but
the person who gives the most.   However, when I deal with fundraisers and
those who give, I experience a kind of game which resembles the children's
game of "tag."     If a person can stimulate a colleague to give more than
he (or she) then the one who gave the most is "it" or the "sucker."     To
my way of thinking, it is the one who gave the least who is doing the
sucking.   UNLESS:

Occasionally you have a different kind of person.   When J.P. Morgan died,
his friends remarked that he wasn't even "wealthy" because he left an estate
so much smaller than theirs.     It seems that Morgan cultivated the culture
of money for the purpose of furthering things he believed in.   When I meet
a person like Morgan, I am always struck with how much they get done on so
little.    Rather than "sucking" for simple venal purposes, they continually
walk on the edge of things and sometimes fall.    They are the ones who are
never "poor" but have "cash squeezes."     When their companies fail, they
never fail to pay off their debts and they also never fail to get credit for
having done so.   The owner of the NY Yankees has had four different company
failures but even when he was without money he was never without the capital
of his mind and his good name.    These are the real Entrepreneurs, not the
stereotypical capitalists who never risk because they believe in very
little, including their own capacities.    The real Entrepreneur creates
products and leaves artifacts of where they've been that benefit far beyond
themselves.

One can call them the true philanthropists, benefactors, etc.    To Jesus,
since this is a time of looking towards that religion, the poor widow who
gave her entire savings to the temple, was more of a risktaker, believed
more in the economic principles of the Temple and  was closer to the God of
the Temple than the bankers who took less risk and gave more but withheld
themselves.   Jesus spoke of the same when he told the story of the three
brothers who were given the same amount to keep for the father.   One buried
it, another invested it modestly while a third used it to great advantage.
When the Father came back the third gave him the triple, the second doubled
it and that first gave him what he had been given.  Needless to say, he
didn't approve of the first choice.   I've always wondered what he would
have felt about the third choice if he had lost the original amount like the
Prodigal Son.   On the surface they seem to be about money but when taken as
a whole, they seem to be against a conservative approach to life and for a
sharing of the wealth.

So what does this have to do with Leaders and Leadership?   For me the issue
is not "Leaders"  but "heroes."    A Leader, in my tradition, is a servant
of the people.   J.P. Morgan seems to have been a servant of his people.
Jesus seems to have been a servant.    Isaiah was the "suffering servant."
Heroes do things that everyone cannot do.    No one ever knows until
afterwards, who is the Hero.

But the Leader brings his community to express the best of themselves for
the community and he or she does the same in their lives.    If you have a
Leader then everyone knows the part they play.    Even the Disrupters or
Tricksters.    The world needs us all in all of our parts or jobs.   Leaders
demand the best from themselves and bring out the best in their communities.
Heroes are different.   They are often failures at leadership for in the
world of the Hero you are a "winner" or a "loser" a Hero or a follower.
Leaders must be creative but Heroes are  more goatlike  than creative.
When the wolves come the Goats serve as Heroes to gather the flock, keeping
them together in adversity.   They also demand the most from a pasture and
often leave it in ruin, cropping everything too close and creating a mud
pen.

So I would desire the Leader who, if wealthy, gives beyond according to
his/her means, and if not then who uses his/her  money wisely in order to
stimulate the success of what he or she believes in.

What does this have to do with Argentina?   Well, Mike Gurstien's story
about the police, could have happened in NYCity with anyone coming from the
Airport who can't read English and takes a Taxi.    There is a stiff fine
but thieves are not limited to private companies or government agencies.
During this time of renewal in the year, it is the time when we think about
growing better people.    People who are responsible, whether in the World
Bank, the Transnational Corporations, the Unions, the Professions or our
Governments.

People who will raise their children not to accept bigotry or simple
classification of groups for the purpose of profiling.   People who instead
will grow to understand and appreciate the differences in cultural styles
and each culture's genius.    When  Poet Jerome Rothenberg went to Africa
and to other areas of the world studying the poetry of Indigenous peoples,
he was reinforced in the truth that there are no half-formed languages in
the world.   That it follows that each people have "majored" in some element
of the human condition that they are better at doing and more subtle in the
application than the rest of humanity.      Kurt Sachs the great Ethno
Musicologist used to speak of a Romanian violin virtuoso who upon the first
hearing of Beethoven Symphonies remarked: "Lots of notes but not much
heart!"     It seems that we all think that the other guy's languages,
music, poetry etc. are less advanced than our own.     Unless we happened to
learn the other guys language, music, poetry, religion etc.    Then it
becomes an issue of appreciation.

I don't think there is one art form for the world, one religion, one
education, one economics and not even one health care.   What is helpful to
one group is often toxic to another, destroying their traditions, their
relationships, the lives and their unity.   Our anti-biotics often cure what
is incurable elsewhere, but a Shaman's chant will also cure a Westerner who
has been diagnosed with Cancer and written off as dying.    Each side has
its answers about why the other succeeded and why they failed to cure their
own.   Life is wonderfully diverse, layered and delightfully complicated.
Rothenberg, a Jew who wrote about Jewish traditions and poetry, called his
books about the 300 million people on the planet who consider themselves
followers of Traditional Indigenous Religion, "Technicians Of The Sacred."
As a man who went to live with the various groups and as a poet himself, he
stated that the subtlety and complexity of Indigenous songs and poetry were
the most advanced of all of the peoples that he had studied.    Our most
Avant Garde composers today have studied drumming in Africa, multi-rhythms
in the SE U.S. intonation in the Balkans and in Peru, bringing back musics
that stretch the mind and erase the distinctions between audience and
performer.   It makes our concert halls seem over ritualized, uptight and
inflexible.   The musics of our religions are almost afraid of density even
having musical revolutions every couple of hundred years in the guise of
returning the music to the people and out of the hands of the
"professionals."     Except the people in these other areas are more
complicated than Western composers and demand more from each other.

So what about it?    "The West IS Technology!"   Or is Western Science
simple mechanics?    I would contend that allowing a machine to do your work
for you builds laziness.   That allowing a politician to be your Hero is
also lazy and irresponsible.    That allowing the wild and wooly marketplace
to rape and pillage the rest of the world in the name of efficiency and
"saving" those foreign folks from their "misery" is also lazy.    To believe
that you can understand or encompass a culture in a business trip or a
vacation is lazy thinking.    Missionaries always come home changed for the
better. (They spend years.)    Even when they live in Missionary compounds
and send their children to English schools, they still can't help but be
touched by the humanity of the people they wish to help.    It changed
Sister Theresa, it changed my relatives and by extension made my life as a
Traditional Kituwa Priest easier in a family that three generations ago
heard the call of Jesus.   As an Artist I am grateful for the diversity of
peoples, arts, religions and cultures in the world.   I find it growing and
it gives my life meaning.     Western Technology is wonderful.    The
Machine that initially drove people apart, away from their families has
taken the form of the computer and today makes this conversation possible.
Helping us to experience each other, including cross cultural
misunderstandings.    But this machine is not the whole of technology, their
are many technologies and each group has a tech-nol-ogy.     When a Tyrant
springs forth, he conceives of his tech-nol-ogy as the only or most
important one.   He conceives it as an issue of Power instead of growth and
knowledge.

So in this time of the rebirth of the Sun for those of us in the North and
the renewal of the FW list, I too pray for leadership both from our Leaders
and our average people.    And I wish you all a Happy Season in whatever way
you think of it.

Ray Evans Harrell, artistic director
The Magic Circle Opera Repertory Ensemble, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 1:26 PM
Subject: RE: Ref.: Re: Kisses to you, too! (was Re: Argentina can arise!
(was Re: Argentina down and out)


> An interesting an important distinction...
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Now I know that we DO NOT need leaders in Mexico and in Argentina. What we
> need is leadership.
>
>
>

Reply via email to