More from the inimitable Bruce Sterling...

The future according to the later Hayek and early Keynes (or do I have that
back to front...

M

-----Original Message-----
From: futurefeedforward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 5, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FCC to Auction Definite, Indefinite Articles

FCC to Auction Definite, Indefinite Articles

WASHINGTON--In a bid to "foster innovation" and "encourage the efficient use
of public resources," the U.S. Federal Communications Commission announced
Tuesday plans to auction exclusive rights to the use of the English definite
and indefinite articles.  "For a number of years the Commission has been
studying the possibility of enhancing the value of English through selective
privatization of some of its features," explains FCC Chairwoman Glenda
Friedboot.  "The auction we propose today is the first Commission initiative
implementing the lessons of that research.  It is also a test initiative,
designed to gauge the effectiveness of a broader privatization policy."

        The auction will affect use of the English words "a," "and," and "the," as
well as any "derivatives or functional equivalents," and will bestow upon
the highest bidder the exclusive right to license use of the words in all
digital media.  "It's important the people understand that the auction
applies only to digital media, and not to conventional print or face-to-face
conversation," explains Chairwoman Friedboot.  "Partly that's because of
technical limitations.  The licensing we hope to foster depends upon
computer-driven and enforced rights management schemes that aren't currently
feasible offline.  But we also recognized the importance of protecting the
historic practice of free, unlicensed use of many parts of speech in daily
conversation."

        An FCC report issued alongside the auction announcement describes a state
of "stagnation" in the area of "language technologies."  "The committee was
unable to discover a single recent innovation in the use or function of many
grammatical mechanisms," noted the report.  The committee went on to note
that "distribution of rights in and to many of these mechanisms would likely
provide sufficient incentive, in the form of licensing revenues, to spur
investment and drive innovation in an important but otherwise static
intellectual asset."

        The bidding system proposed by the Commission includes the sale of rights
to the articles on a regional basis, with winning bidders acquiring the
right to license use of the articles in all digital formats within a bounded
geographic area.  "Local control of media assets has always been an
important value here at the Commission," explains Chairwoman Friedboot.  "So
we require that all bidding entities be majority owned by members of the
geographic regions they serve."

        Critics of the plan acknowledge its potential to raise billions of dollars
for the public coffers, but point to the risks of privatizing key public
resources.  "This auction is simply a corporate giveaway," exclaims Robert
Desk, executive director of the Commons Defense Force (CDF).  "The local
ownership rules are a joke, and easily circumvented through a series of
shells and dummy corporations.  We've dug down in the list or preliminary
bidders, and what we've found behind the mask of local ownership is, almost
universally, big media companies like AOL, KT, and NPR.  This plan is just
going to extend already excessive private control over public discourse."

        A number of planned legal challenges to the FCC auction, including one
joined by the CDF, argue that the sale infringes important free speech
rights by privatizing words.  "We've looked carefully at the [free speech]
issue and designed the auction accordingly," responds Chairwoman Friedboot.
"The auction does not actually sell rights to the words 'a', 'an', and
'the'.  The plan offers only the rights to the definite and indefinite
articles as grammatical functions.  People will still be free to use the
words, as long as they are not used as articles.  By the same token, people
will not be permitted to make unlicensed substitutions for the articles.
Assigning rights in the grammar is key to driving substantial innovation in
language.  We don't want to simply encourage cosmetic changes in the look
and sound of words."

        Though a number of potential bidders were pre-qualified during a plan
feasibility study, the period of bidder qualification begins officially
today and is scheduled to run through the end of the year.

________________________________________

You have received this story as a subscriber to futurefeedforward.

For more stories, visit our archive at
http://futurefeedforward.com/archive2.mv

For a history of the future, visit our timeline at
http://futurefeedforward.com/timeline2.mv

To unscubscribe, visit http://futurefeedforward.com/e_list.mv
____________________________________

Reply via email to