Hi Arthur,

Now here's something else even more amazing for you to chew over. I know
you are somewhat interested in this, but I'll write this to the list in
case there are some FWers who might also be interested.

You will know that I'm deeply interested in the ideas of David Bohm (who
died recently), formerly an associate of Einstein, who (with a few more
eminent physicists) considered that there is un underlying a Quantum Field
which guides the apparent unforecastable pathways of sub-atomic particles
(as per orthodox Quantum Theory). It is more like a deep information field,
which is how I tend to regard it.

I will try to describe a BBC radio science programme of this afternoon. A
couple of mathemeticians were talking of experiments in which students had
to guess the continuation of runs of numbers. Now these runs of numbers
were either purely random numbers or apparent random numbers derived from
formula containing what are called hidden attractors. Given these sets of
numbers, there would be no possible way for anybody to know which was
which, and indeed a super-computer running for a very long time, and given
immensely more data, would be necessary to find out. Yet some students were
able to guess sequences far more than by chance alone. The experiments were
totally blind and telepathy (as we usually consider it) was thus totally
ruled out. I repeat, the scientists concerned were Oxbridge mathematicians
of repute -- they weren't parapsychologists of any sort. Yet somehow some
students were tapping into a knowledge of the way the numbers were
originally generated.

That's as far as I can go -- most of it was way way above my head and I'm
sure I haven't explained it very well. But the mathematicians concerned
also expressed amazement and confessed that they were totally mystified.
(I'm sure that this will be published more widely in popular form in due
course, so I'm looking forward to this.) 

Keith 
  
__________________________________________________________
�Writers used to write because they had something to say; now they write in
order to discover if they have something to say.� John D. Barrow
_________________________________________________
Keith Hudson, Bath, England;  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________

Reply via email to