Hi Ray,

At 13:21 11/04/02 -0400,
(REH) 
>I don't know Pete.   It sounds a little like herding porcupines to me.

Apart from agreeing with what Pete wrote I don't think I have anything to
add -- save to comment on his final paragraph:

(PV)
>> I didn't notice it mentioned here (may have missed it), but one of
>> the types of stress which affected the rats, if I recall, was
>> overpopulation. Some researchers then of course proposed that the
>> purpose of the whole mechanism was to limit population levels.
>> I believe the (darwinian) selectability of such a mechanism was then
>> hotly debated, and I don't recall the outcome.

This was indeed the reason why Reg Morrison mentioned the research into
homosexuality because his book is mainly about overpopulation and other
limits to economic growth. Another hormonal factor which limits human
population growth (or used to, in bygone hunter-gathering eras) is that
while a mother is suckling her baby (so long as it's very regular and
frequent) her hormones prevent further conception. In the agricultural era,
when mothers were needed at peak times in the fields to sow and harvest
(probably leaving her baby with grandparents at home), then they would
easily have become fertile again (apparently only a short pause in suckling
is necessary for the normal hormones to re-assert themselves) -- thus one
of the reasons for very large families in agrarian regions. A great deal of
this research used to be done at Edinburgh University but I have no
references to this.

As to homosexuals being in the vanguard of the creative movement, I'm not
so sure. A full-scale statistical analysis (assuming one could make an
objective choice of creative people) would have to be done on this
question. What I'm more sure about is that creative people need plenty of
time to gestate ideas so, without families to care for, homosexuals would
seem to have an advantage.

Keith     
__________________________________________________________
�Writers used to write because they had something to say; now they write in
order to discover if they have something to say.� John D. Barrow
_________________________________________________
Keith Hudson, Bath, England;  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________

Reply via email to